Regional efforts to mitigate climate change in China: a multi-criteria assessment approach

  • Zhi-Fu Mi
  • Yi-Ming WeiEmail author
  • Chen-Qi He
  • Hua-Nan Li
  • Xiao-Chen Yuan
  • Hua Liao
Original Article


The task of mitigating climate change is usually allocated through administrative regions in China. In order to put pressure on regions that perform poorly in mitigating climate changes and highlight regions with best-practice climate policies, this study explored a method to assess regional efforts on climate change mitigation at the sub-national level. A climate change mitigation index (CCMI) was developed with 15 objective indicators, which were divided into four categories, namely, emissions, efficiency, non-fossil energy, and climate policy. The indicators’ current level and recent development were measured for the first three categories. The index was applied to assess China’s provincial performance in climate protection based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. Empirical results show that the middle Yangtze River area and southern coastal area perform better than other areas in mitigating climate change. The average performance of the northwest area in China is the worst. In addition, climate change mitigation performance has a negative linear correlation with energy self-sufficiency ratio but does not have a significant linear correlation with social development level. Therefore, regional resource endowments had better be paid much more attention in terms of mitigating climate change because regions with good resource endowments in China tend to perform poorly.


Carbon efficiency Climate policy Energy efficiency Mitigation efforts Non-fossil energy TOPSIS 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the “Strategic Priority Research Program” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA05150600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (71020107026, 71273031). We are also grateful to colleagues from Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP) at Beijing Institute of Technology for helpful suggestions.


  1. Baer P, Harte J, Haya B, Herzog AV, Holdren J, Hultman NE, Kammen DM, Norgaard RB, Raymond L (2000) Equity and greenhouse gas responsibility. Science 289(5488):2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burck J, Hermwille L, Bals C (2014a) The climate change performance index: background and methodology. Germanwatch, Bonn. Cited 1 August 2014
  3. Burck J, Marten F, Bals C (2014b) The climate change performance index: Results 2014. Germanwatch, Bonn. Cited 1 August 2014
  4. Calvin K, Fawcett A, Jiang K (2012) Comparing model results to national climate policy goals: results from the Asia modeling exercise. Energy Econ 34(3):S306–S315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen W, He Q (2014) Intersectoral burden sharing of CO2 mitigation in China in 2020. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Dual Citizen (2012) The 2012 global green economy index. Dual Citizen, Washington. Cited 1 August 2014
  7. Ertuğrul İ, Karakaşoğlu N (2009) Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 36(1):702–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng K, Davis SJ, Sun L, Li X, Guan D, Liu W, Liu Z, Hubacek K (2013) Outsourcing CO2 within China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(28):11654–11659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo X-D, Zhu L, Fan Y, Xie B-C (2011) Evaluation of potential reductions in carbon emissions in Chinese provinces based on environmental DEA. Energy Policy 39(5):2352–2360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holland A, Vagg X (2013) The global security defense index on climate change: preliminary results. American Security Project, Washington. Cited 1 August 2014
  11. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, a state of the art survey. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IEA (2014) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion highlights 2014. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris. Cited 1 August 2014
  13. IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Cited 1 September 2014
  14. IPCC (2011) IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2014a) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2014b) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Konidari P, Mavrakis D (2007) A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments. Energy Policy 35(12):6235–6257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu Z, Geng Y, Lindner S, Guan D (2012) Uncovering China’s greenhouse gas emission from regional and sectoral perspectives. Energy 45(1):1059–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu Z, Guan D, Crawford-Brown D, Zhang Q, He K, Liu J (2013) Energy policy: a low-carbon road map for China. Nature 500(7461):143–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mi Z-F, Pan S-Y, Yu H, Wei Y-M (2014) Potential impacts of industrial structure on energy consumption and CO2 emission: a case study of Beijing. J Clean Prod (in press)Google Scholar
  21. NBS (2012) China energy statistical yearbook 2012. China Statistical Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  22. NBS (2013a) China energy statistical yearbook 2013. China Statistical Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  23. NBS (2013b) China statistical yearbook 2013. China Statistical Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  24. Oberheitmann A (2010) A new post-Kyoto climate regime based on per-capita cumulative CO2-emission rights—rationale, architecture and quantitative assessment of the implication for the CO2-emissions from China, India and the annex-I countries by 2050. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15(2):137–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pan J, Wang H, Liang B, Zhou Y (2013) Smart low-carbon development of cities in China. China Social Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  26. Price L, Zhou N, Fridley D, Ohshita S, Lu H, Zheng N, Fino-Chen C (2013) Development of a low-carbon indicator system for China. Habitat Int 37:4–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. PwC (2013) Carbon economy index 2013: busting the carbon budget. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), London. Cited 1 August 2014
  28. Scrieciu SŞ, Chalabi Z (2014) Climate policy planning and development impact assessment. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 19(3):255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scrieciu S, Rezai A, Mechler R (2013) On the economic foundations of green growth discourses: the case of climate change mitigation and macroeconomic dynamics in economic modeling. WIREs Energy Environ 2(3):251–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scrieciu SŞ, Belton V, Chalabi Z, Mechler R, Puig D (2014) Advancing methodological thinking and practice for development-compatible climate policy planning. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 19(3):261–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. State Council (2011a) Comprehensive work plan for energy conservation and emission reduction during the twelfth five-year plan period. Cited 1 September 2014
  32. State Council (2011b) The twelfth five-year plan for national economic and social development of the People’s Republic of China. Cited 1 September 2014
  33. Streimikiene D, Balezentis T (2013) Multi-objective ranking of climate change mitigation policies and measures in Lithuania. Renew Sust Energy Rev 18:144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Streimikiene D, Volochovic A, Simanaviciene Z (2012) Comparative assessment of policies targeting energy use efficiency in Lithuania. Renew Sust Energy Rev 16(6):3613–3620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2012) Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries. Energy Econ 34(3):686–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tang Z, Nan Z (2013) The potential of cropland soil carbon sequestration in the Loess Plateau, China. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 18(7):889–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. The White House (2014) U.S.–China joint announcement on climate change. Cited 15 November 2014
  38. Van Sluisveld MAE, Gernaat DEHJ, Ashina S, Calvin KV, Garg A, Isaac M, Lucas PL, Mouratiadou I, Otto SAC, Rao S, Shukla PR, Van Vliet J, Van Vuuren DP (2013) A multi-model analysis of post-2020 mitigation efforts of five major economies. Clim Chang Econ 4(4):1–24Google Scholar
  39. Wang K, Wei Y-M (2014) China’s regional industrial energy efficiency and carbon emissions abatement costs. Appl Energy 130:617–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang K, Yu S, Zhang W (2013) China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: a DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation. Math Comput Model 58(5–6):1117–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wei Y-M, Mi Z-F, Huang Z (2014) Climate policy modeling: an online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review. Omega (in press)Google Scholar
  42. Yu S, Wei Y-M, Guo H, Ding L (2014) Carbon emission coefficient measurement of the coal-to-power energy chain in China. Appl Energy 114:290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2008) A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. Eur J Oper Res 189(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou P, Ang BW, Han JY (2010) Total factor carbon emission performance: a Malmquist index analysis. Energy Econ 32(1):194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhi-Fu Mi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yi-Ming Wei
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Chen-Qi He
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hua-Nan Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiao-Chen Yuan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hua Liao
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Energy and Environmental Policy ResearchBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations