The adaptive capacity of institutions in the spatial planning, water, agriculture and nature sectors in the Netherlands

  • J. Gupta
  • E. Bergsma
  • C. J. A. M. Termeer
  • G. R. Biesbroek
  • M. van den Brink
  • P. Jong
  • J. E. M. Klostermann
  • S. Meijerink
  • S. Nooteboom
Original Article

Abstract

The climate change problem calls for a continuously responding society. This raises the question: Do our institutions allow and encourage society to continuously adapt to climate change? This paper uses the Adaptive Capacity Wheel (ACW) to assess the adaptive capacity of formal and informal institutions in four sectors in the Netherlands: spatial planning, water, agriculture and nature. Formal institutions are examined through an assessment of 11 key policy documents and informal institutions are analysed through four case studies covering each sector. Based on these ACW analyses, both sector-specific and more general strengths and weaknesses of the adaptive capacity of institutions in the Netherlands are identified. The paper concludes that the most important challenge for increasing institutional adaptive capacity lies in combining decentralized, participatory approaches with more top-down methods that generate leadership (visions, goals) standards, instruments, resources and monitoring.

Keywords

Adaptation Adaptive capacity Climate change Institutional theory The Netherlands 

Supplementary material

11027_2014_9630_MOESM1_ESM.doc (376 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 376 kb)

References

  1. Adger N (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal A (2008) The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Arts B, van Tatenhove J (2004) Policy and power: a conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms. Policy Sci 37:339–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergsma E, Gupta J, Jong P (2012) Climate change and individual responsibility in adaptive capacity – the case of the Netherlands. J Resour Conserv Recycl 64:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berman R, Quinn C, Paavola J (2012) The role of institutions in the transformation of coping capacity to sustainable adaptive capacity. Environ Dev 2:86–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown HCP, Nkem JN, Sonwa DJ, Bele Y (2010) Institutional adaptive capacity and climate change response in the Congo Basin forests of Cameroon. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15(3):263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemens ES, Cook JM (1999) Politics and institutionalism: explaining durability and change. Annu Rev Sociol 25:441–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delta Commission (2008) Samen werken met water - Een land dat leeft, bouwt aan zijn toekomst. Deltacommissie: Rotterdam. Available online at: http://www.deltacommissie.com/doc/2008-09-03%20Advies%20Deltacommissie.pdf
  9. Duit A, Galaz V, Eckerberg K, Ebbesson J (2010) Governance, complexity, and resilience. Glob Environ Chang 20(3):363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engle NL (2011) Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Glob Environ Chang 21(21):647–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eriksen S, Lind J (2009) Adaptation as a political process: adjustment to drought and conflict in Kenya’s drylands. Environ Manag 43:817–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. European Commission (2009) The common agricultural policy explained. European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/capexplained/cap_en.pdf. Cited 01 May 2014
  13. Flora and Fauna Act (1998) Flora en Faunawet. Bulletin of Acts and Decrees, 1998, No. 402, 1999, No. 264; last revisions: Bull. 2008, 4 and Government Gazette 2010, No. 20455Google Scholar
  14. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30(1):441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaas E, Jonsson A, Hjerpe M, Andersson-Skold Y (2010) Managing climate change vulnerabilities: formal institutions and knowledge use as determinants of adaptive capacity at the local level in Sweden. Local Environ 15(6):525–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta J, Dellapenna J (2009) The challenges for the twenty first century: a critical approach. In: Dellapenna J, Gupta J (eds) The evolution of the law and politics of water. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta J, Termeer K, Klostermann J, Meijerink S, van den Brink M, Jong P, Nooteboom S, Bergsma E (2010) The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Pol 13:459–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IDGEC Scientific Planning Committee (1999) Institutional dimensions of global environmental change. IHDP Report No. 9., BonnGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Jong P, van der Brink M (2013) Between tradition and innovation: developing Flood Risk Management Plans in the Netherlands. J Flood Risk Manag. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12070 Google Scholar
  21. Kabat P, van Vierssen W, Veraart JA, Vellinga P, Aerts J (2005) Editorial: climate proofing the Netherlands. Nature 438(7066):283–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klostermann J, Bergsma E, Gupta J, Jong P (2010) Institutions for adaptation: applying the adaptive capacity wheel on the background document of the Content Analysis. IC12 Working Document 5, Report Number W10/008, Institute for Environmental Studies, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  23. Lemstra W (2005) Motie-Lemstra (CDA) c.s. inzake lange termijninvesteringsstrate-gieën op het gebied van ruimtelijk-economisch beleid in Nederland (EK, XXI-C). The Dutch Senate: The HagueGoogle Scholar
  24. LNV (1995) Structuurschema Groene Ruimte: het landelijk gebied de moeite waard. Deel 4: Planologische Kernbeslissing. Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  25. LNV (2004) Agenda voor een vitaal platteland – Visie: inspelen op veranderingen. Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, The Hague. http://www.minlnv.nl/portal/page?_pageid=116,1640321&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&p_file_id=13747. Cited 01 May 2014
  26. March JG, Olsen JP (1989) Rediscovering institutions. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Municipal Water Tasks Act (2008) Wet Gemeentelijke Watertaken. Bulletin of Acts and Decrees, 2007, No. 276, 277Google Scholar
  28. Nature Conservation Act (1998) Natuurbeschermingswet. Bulletin of Acts and Decrees, 1998, No. 403; 1999, No. 15; last revisions: Bull. 2010, No. 135, 142, Government Gazette 2010, 20455Google Scholar
  29. Nelson R, Howden M, Smith MS (2008) Using adaptive governance to rethink the way science supports Australian drought policy. Environ Sci Pol 11:588–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ostrovskaya E, Douven W, Schwartz K, Pataki B, Mukuyu P, Kaggwa RC (2013) Capacity for sustainable management of wetlands: lessons from the WETwin project. Environ Sci Pol 34:128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paavola J (2008) Livelihoods, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in Morogoro, Tanzania. Environ Sci Pol 11:642–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pelling M, High C, Dearing J, Smith D (2008) Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organizations. Environ Plan A 40:867–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pollit C, Bouckaert G (2000) Public management reform: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. RIZA (2003) Handreiking Watertoets 2. RIZA: The Hague/Lelystad. Available online at: http://www.av-consulting.nl/activiteiten/watertoets/handreiking2.pdf
  35. Rural Areas Development Act (2007) Wet Inrichting Landelijk Gebied. Bulletin of Acts and Decrees, 2006, No. 666, 677; last revisions: Bull. 2009, 18Google Scholar
  36. Scharpf FW (1997) Games real actors play. Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  37. Spatial Planning Act (2008) Wet ruimtelijke ordening. Bulletin of Acts and Decrees, 2006, No. 566, 2008, No. 227; last revisions: Bull. 2010, No. 135 and Government Gazette 2010, No. 20455Google Scholar
  38. Tol RSJ, Yohe GW (2006) The weakest link hypothesis for adaptive capacity: an empirical test. Glob Environ Chang 17:218–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van den Brink MA, Termeer C, Meijerink SV (2011) Are Dutch water safety institutions prepared for climate change? J Water Clim Chang 4(2):272–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van den Brink MA, Meijerink SV, Termeer C, Gupta J (2013) Climate-proof planning for flood-prone areas: assessing the adaptive capacity of planning institutions in the Netherlands. Reg Environ Chang. doi:10.1007/s10113-012-0401-7 Google Scholar
  41. VenW, VROM, LNV (2009) Nationaal Waterplan 2009-2015. Ministerie van VenW: Den Haag. Available online at: http://www.verkeerenwaterstaat.nl/Images/NWP_tcm195-270588.pdf
  42. Vincent K (2006) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity and the importance of scale. Glob Environ Chang 17:12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. VROM (2006) Nota Ruimte – Ruimte voor ontwikkeling. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  44. VROM (2007) Maak ruimte voor klimaat! Beleidsnotitie. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment: The Hague. Available online at: http://www.vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=2706&sp=2&dn=7503
  45. Water Act (2009) Waterwet. Bulletin of Acts and Decrees, 2009, No. 107, 549; last revisions: Bull. 2010, 135, Government Gazette 2010, 20455Google Scholar
  46. WRR (2006) Klimaatstrategie - tussen ambitie en realisme. WRR report no. 74. WRR: The Hague. Available online at: http://www.wrr.nl/content.jsp?objectid=3619

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Gupta
    • 1
    • 8
  • E. Bergsma
    • 1
  • C. J. A. M. Termeer
    • 2
  • G. R. Biesbroek
    • 2
  • M. van den Brink
    • 3
  • P. Jong
    • 4
  • J. E. M. Klostermann
    • 5
  • S. Meijerink
    • 6
  • S. Nooteboom
    • 7
  1. 1.Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, Faculty of Social and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Wageningen School of Social SciencesWageningen URWageningenNetherlands
  3. 3.Faculty of Spatial SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenNetherlands
  4. 4.Faculty of Architecture and the Built EnvironmentDelft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
  5. 5.AlterraWageningen URWageningenNetherlands
  6. 6.Institute for Management ResearchRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
  7. 7.Faculty of Social ScienceErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands
  8. 8.UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water EducationDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations