Advertisement

Pro-environmental behavior and public understanding of climate change

  • Muhammad Mehedi MasudEmail author
  • Rulia Akhtar
  • Rafia Afroz
  • Abul Quasem Al-Amin
  • Fatimah Binti Kari
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine whether awareness, knowledge and risk perception of climate change have significant influence on attitudes and pro-environmental behaviour. The study found that awareness, knowledge and risk perception of climate change positively influence the formation of favourable attitudes future action climate change. In addition, this paper also found mediated relationship through attitudes between awareness, knowledge, risk perception and pro-environmental behaviour. The paper argues that people are more likely to accept pro-environmental behaviours only if they have sufficient understanding of the adverse impacts of no action. This study offers decision makers field data to formulate relevant environmental policies and strategies in Malaysia.

Keywords

Public awareness Knowledge Risk perception Attitudes Climate change and pro-environmental behaviour 

References

  1. Ahmad AL, Rahim SA, Pawanteh L, Ahmad F (2012) The understanding of environmental citizenship among Malaysian youths: a study on perception and participation. Asian Soc Sci 8(5):p85Google Scholar
  2. Burgess J, Harrison C, Filius P (1998) Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. J Environ Plan A 30:1445–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Department of Statistics, Malaysia (2012) Retrieved 31 December 2012Google Scholar
  4. Doss C, Morris M (2001) How does gender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations? The case of improved maize technology in Ghana. Agric Econ 25:27–39Google Scholar
  5. Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  6. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin JB, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modelling technique. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods 3(1):76–83Google Scholar
  8. Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia (JPM) (2011) Retrieved from http://moonlightchest.com/selangor/ (Accessed 2013-02-20)
  9. Jim, C. & S. S. Xu (2002). Stifled stakeholders and subdued participation: interpreting local responses toward Shimentai Nature Reserve in South China. Environ Manag 30(3):327–341Google Scholar
  10. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leiserowitz A (2007) Human Development Report 2007/2008: fighting climate change: human solidarity in a dividend world. UNDPGoogle Scholar
  12. Lin, S. P. (2012). The gap between global issues and personal behaviors: pro-environmental behaviors of citizens toward climate change in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 1–11Google Scholar
  13. Liverani A (2009) Climate change and individual behavior. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5058Google Scholar
  14. Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF (2006) Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Clim Chang 77(1–2):73–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moser SC (2006) Talk of the city: engaging urbanites on climate change. Environ Res Lett 1:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Natura, F. (1995). Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environ Conserv 22(3)Google Scholar
  17. O’Connor RE, Bord RJ, Fisher A (1999) Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal 19:461–471Google Scholar
  18. Patchen M (2006) Public attitudes and behavior about climate change: what shapes them and how to influence them. University of Purdue, East LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  19. Pew Global Attitudes Project (2006) No global warming alarm in the US. The Pew Research Center for the People and Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Schultz PW, Oskamp S (1996) Effort as a moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship: General environmental concern and recycling. Soc Psychol Q 375–383Google Scholar
  21. Stern N (2006) The economics of climate change. United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  22. Whitmarsh L, Lorenzoni I (2010) Perceptions, behavior and communication of climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1(2):158–161Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Mehedi Masud
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rulia Akhtar
    • 2
  • Rafia Afroz
    • 2
  • Abul Quasem Al-Amin
    • 1
  • Fatimah Binti Kari
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and AdministrationUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and Management SciencesInternational Islamic University MalaysiaSelangorMalaysia

Personalised recommendations