Advertisement

Barriers and opportunities for urban adaptation planning: analytical framework and evidence from cities in Latin America and Germany

  • Paul LehmannEmail author
  • Miriam Brenck
  • Oliver Gebhardt
  • Sven Schaller
  • Elisabeth Süßbauer
Original Article

Abstract

This paper analyzes barriers and opportunities for effective adaptation planning in cities. In particular, we focus on the preparation and adoption of adaptation strategies and action plans by urban planners. For this purpose, we develop a two-tier framework of variables influencing decision-making. The framework emphasizes interaction between different commonly discussed categories of barriers (or opportunities) and their sources. We argue that whether or not urban planners take action to foster adaptation to climate change depends on three first-tier variables: information, resources, and incentives. In addition, we point out that each of these variables may itself be a function of a set of underlying second-tier variables, including actor-specific characteristics of the decision-maker, the institutional environment, and the natural and socio-economic environment. Within this framework, we specify barriers and opportunities for effective adaptation planning as hampering or promoting characteristics of these first- and second-tier variables. We apply and test the framework within the context of four case studies carried out in Lima (Peru), Santiago (Chile), Berlin and Sangerhausen (both Germany). We present anecdotal evidence, which we have gained from expert interviews in the cities. Our results indicate that the relevant categories of barriers are mainly the same across developing and developed countries. What differs is their severity. Moreover, we confirm the importance of the institutional context, including barriers and opportunities associated mainstreaming adaptation, multi-level governance and participation. Finally, our analysis reveals barriers that are specific for local or urban adaptation action, such as the strong dependency on the national regulatory framework.

Keywords

Adaptation Barriers Climate change Framework Germany Latin America Urban planning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for helpful and constructive comments provided by three anonymous referees. Our paper has also benefited from discussions at seminars held at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ in Leipzig (Germany) and the Chameleon Workshop on Barriers to Adaptation to Climate Change organized in Berlin (Germany) in September 2012. Research for this paper has been carried out in the context of (1) the project “Sustainable Water and Wastewater Management in Urban Growth Centres Coping with Climate Change – Concepts for Lima Metropolitana (Perú) – (LiWa)” funded by programme “Research for the Sustainable Development of the Megacities of Tomorrow” of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Paul Lehmann), (2) the project “Entscheidungsunterstützung bei der urbanen Klimaanpassung – Ökonomische Bewertung und Priorisierung von Anpassungsmaßnahmen am Beispiel der Stadt Sangerhausen, Landkreis Mansfeld-Südharz” funded by the Saxony-Anhalt State Ministry for Agriculture and the Environment (Miriam Brenck and Oliver Gebhardt), (3) the project “Climate Adaptation Santiago (CAS)” funded by the International Climate Initiative of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) (Sven Schaller), and (4) the Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Graduate School for Environmental Research (HIGRADE) funded by the Helmholtz Impulse and Networking Fund (Elisabeth Süßbauer).

References

  1. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 717–743Google Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93:335–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg (2011) Die kleine Berlin-Statistik 2011. Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Amundsen H, Berglund F, Westskog H (2010) Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation - a question of multilevel governance? Environ Plan C: Gov Pol 28:276–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2010) Climate change adaptation in New York City. Building a Risk Management Response. New York Academy of Sciences, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnell NW, Delaney EK (2006) Adapting to climate change: public water supply in England and Wales. Clim Chang 78:227–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkhout F, Hertin J, Gann DM (2006) Learning to adapt: organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Clim Chang 78:135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Betsill MM (2001) Mitigating climate change in US cities: opportunities and obstacles. Local Environ 6:393–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Betsill MM, Bulkeley H (2007) Looking back and thinking ahead: a decade of cities and climate change research. Local Environ 12:135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biesbroek GR, Klostermann JEM, Termeer CJAM, Kabat P (2013) On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Reg Environ Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10113-10013-10421-y Google Scholar
  11. Biesbroek R, Klostermann J, Termeer C, Kabat P (2011) Barriers to climate change adaptation in the Netherlands. Clim Law 2:181–199Google Scholar
  12. Bulkeley H, Kern K (2006) Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UK. Urban Stud 43:2237–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bulkeley H, Schroeder H, Janda K, Zhao J, Armstrong A, Yi Chu S, Ghosh S (2011) The role of institutions, governance, and urban planning for mitigation and adaptation. In: Hoornweg D, Freire M, Lee MJ, Bhada-Tata P, Yuen B (eds) Cities and climate change. Responding to an urgent agenda. World Bank, Washington, pp 125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burch S (2010a) In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: an examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities. Energ Pol 38:7575–7585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burch S (2010b) Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: Insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Glob Environ Chang 20:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carmin J, Robert D, Anguelovski I (2009) Planning climate resilient cities. Early lessons from early adapters. Paper prepared for the World Bank, 5th Urban Research Symposium. Cities and Climate Change, MarseilleGoogle Scholar
  17. Corfee-Morlot J, Cochran I, Hallegatte S, Teasdale P-J (2011) Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Clim Chang 104:169–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crabbé P, Robin M (2006) Institutional adaptation of water resource infrastructures to climate change in Eastern Ontario. Clim Chang 78:103–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisenack K (2013) The inefficiency of private adaptation to pollution in the presence of endogenous market structure. Environ Resour Econ. doi: 10.1007/s10640-10013-19667-10646 Google Scholar
  20. Eisenack K, Stecker R (2012) A framework for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 17:243–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eurostat (2010) Regional GDP per inhabitant in 2007: GDP per inhabitant ranged from 26% of the EU27 average in Severozapaden in Bulgaria to 334% in Inner London. Eurostat, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  22. Falaleeva M, O’Mahony C, Gray S, Desmond M, Gault J, Cummins V (2011) Towards climate adaptation and coastal governance in Ireland: Integrated architecture for effective management? Mar Pol 35:784–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fankhauser S (2009) A perspective paper on adaptation as a response to climate change. Copenhagen Consensus Centre, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  24. Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, King M, Fugal C (2010) Vulnerability of Aboriginal health systems in Canada to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 20:668–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Füssel H-M (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Füssel H-M, Klein RJT (2004) Conceptual frameworks of adaptation to climate change and their applicability to human health. PIK Report No. 91. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Gawel E, Heuson C, Lehmann P (2012) Efficient public adaptation to climate change – An investigation of drivers and barriers from a Public Choice perspective. UFZ Discussion Paper 14/2012. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  28. Goulden M, Conway D, Persechino A (2009) Adaptation to climate change in international river basins in Africa: a review. Hydrol Sci J 54:805–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hardoy J, Romero Lankao P (2011) Latin American cities and climate change. Challenges and options to mitigation and adaptation responses. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3:158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heinrichs D, Aggarwal R, Barton J, Bharucha E, Butsch C, Fragkias M, Johnston P, Kraas F, Krellenberg K, Lampis A, Giok Ling O, Vogel J (2011) Adapting cities to climate change. Opportunities and constraints. In: Hoornweg D, Freire M, Lee M, Bhada-Tata P, Yuen B (eds) Cities and climate change. Responding to an urgent agenda. World Bank, Washington, pp 193–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heuson C, Gawel E, Gebhardt O, Hansjürgens B, Lehmann P, Meyer V, Schwarze R (2012) Fundamental questions on the economics of climate adaptation - outlines of a new research programme. UFZ Report 05/2012. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  32. Hunt A, Watkiss P (2011) Climate change impacts and adaptation in cities: a review of the literature. Clim Chang 104:13–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ICLEI (2011) Financing the resilient city. A demand driven approach to development, disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation – an ICLEI white paper. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), BonnGoogle Scholar
  34. Inderberg TH (2011) Institutional constraints to adaptive capacity: adaptability to climate change in the Norwegian electricity sector. Local Environ 16:303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jantarasami LC, Lawler JJ, Thomas CW (2010) Institutional barriers to climate change adaptation in U.S. National Parks and Forests. Ecol Soc 15:33Google Scholar
  36. Koch IC, Vogel C, Patel Z (2007) Institutional dynamics and climate change adaptation in South Africa. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12:1323–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Landkreis Mansfeld-Südharz (2011) Ihr standort im landkreis Mansfeld-Südharz - Ihre Chance in Mitteldeutschland. Landkreis Mansfeld-Südharz, SangerhausenGoogle Scholar
  38. Lebel L, Manuta JB, Garden P (2011) Institutional traps and vulnerability to changes in climate and flood regimes in Thailand. Reg Environ Chang 11:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. London Climate Partnership (2006) Adapting to climate change. Lessons for London. London Climate Partnership, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Magee N, Curtis J, Wendler G (1999) The urban heat island effect at Fairbanks, Alaska. Theor Appl Climatol 64:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McEvoy D, Matczak P, Banaszak I, Chorynski A (2010) Framing adaptation to climate-related extreme events. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15:779–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Measham T, Preston BL, Smith TF, Brooke C, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Morrison C (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16:889–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meuser M, Nagel U (2005) ExpertInneninterviews - vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht. Ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion. In: Bogner A, Littig B, Menz W (eds) Das experteninterview. Theorie, methode, anwendung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 71–93Google Scholar
  44. MML (2012) La Estrategia de Adaptación de la Provincia de Lima al Cambio Climático. Municipalidad Metropolitana de Lima (MML), LimaGoogle Scholar
  45. Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:22026–22031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moss T (2004) The governance of land use in river basins: prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU Water Framework Directive. Land Use Pol 21:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mukheibir P, Ziervogel G (2006) Framework for adaptation to climate change in the city of Cape Town. City of Cape Town, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  48. Müller A (2012) Areas at risk - concept and methods for urban flood risk assessment. A case study of Santiago de Chile. Franz Steiner Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  49. Næss LO, Bang G, Eriksen S, Vevatne J (2005) Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Glob Environ Chang 15:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Osberghaus D, Dannenberg A, Mennel T, Sturm B (2010) The role of the government in adaptation to climate change. Environ Plan C: Gov Pol 28:834–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (2007) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Penney J, Wieditz I (2007) Cities preparing for climate change: a study of six urban regions. Clean Air Partnership, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  53. Rehner J, Samaniego J, Jordán R (2010) Regional Panorama Latin America. Megacities and Sustainability. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Santiago de ChileGoogle Scholar
  54. Reid S, Smit B, Cladwell W, Belliveau S (2007) Vulnerability and adaptation to climate risks in Ontario agriculture. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12:609–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reser JP, Swim JK (2011) Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. Am Psychol 66:277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Revi A (2008) Climate change risk: an adaptation and mitigation agenda for Indian cities. Environ Urban 20:207–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Romero H, Molina M (2008) Relación espacial entre tipos de usos y coberturas de suelos de Islas de Calor en Santiago de Chile. An Soc Chil Cien Geográficas 1:223–230Google Scholar
  58. Runhaar H, Mees H, Wardekker A, van der Sluijs J, Driessen PPJ (2012) Adaptation to climate change-related risks in Dutch urban areas: stimuli and barriers. Reg Environ Chang 12:777–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (2007) Contribution of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  60. Statistisches Landesamt Sachsen-Anhalt (2010) Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Bevölkerung der Gemeinden. Statistisches Landesamt Sachsen-Anhalt, HalleGoogle Scholar
  61. Storbjörk S (2007) Governing climate adaptation in the local area: challenges of risk management and planning in Sweden. Local Environ 12:457–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. UNDP/UNEP (2011) Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into development planning: a guide for practitioners. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)/United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), NairobiGoogle Scholar
  63. West JM, Julius SH, Kareiva P, Enquist C, Lawler JJ, Petersen B, Johnson AE, Shaw MR (2009) U.S. natural resources and climate change: concepts and approaches for management adaptation. Environ Manag 44:1001–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Lehmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miriam Brenck
    • 1
  • Oliver Gebhardt
    • 1
  • Sven Schaller
    • 2
  • Elisabeth Süßbauer
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.DBFZ Deutsches BiomasserforschungszentrumLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.Department of Urban and Environmental SociologyHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations