An analysis of the causes of the mitigation bias in international climate finance

Original Article

Abstract

Research on international climate finance got a new impetus from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Cancun Accords in 2010 which pledge to mobilize US dollars (USD) 100 billion in international climate financing annually by 2020. The Accords’ specification that adaptation must be addressed with the same priority as mitigation is not reflected in current patterns of international climate finance where we face a strong bias towards mitigation finance. A recent study by Buchner et al. (2011) ascertains a split between mitigation and adaptation finance of 95:5. In this paper, we investigate potential reasons for this bias. In our framework, we distinguish different decision layers and actors involved in international climate finance in order to categorize the causes responsible for the low priority of adaptation in international finance. The identification of obstacles for international adaptation funding is a first crucial step in the search for ways to overcome respective barriers. We find several different causes of the mitigation bias and these might offer starting points for policies aiming at raising adaptation finance and curing this bias. Furthermore, we describe interrelations between these causes which effective policies have to take into account.

Keywords

Adaptation Climate agreements Mitigation International transfers 

References

  1. Aaheim A (2009) Ancillary benefits of adaptation to climate change. In: John KD, Rübbelke DTG (eds) Benefits of environmental policy. Routledge, London and New York, pp 36–60Google Scholar
  2. Aakre S, Rübbelke DTG (2010) Objectives of public economic policy and the adaptation to climate change. J Environ Plan Manag 53:767–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anantram K, Noronha L (2005) Financing adaptation. Discussion paper, The Energy and Resource Institute, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  4. Atteridge A (2011) Will private finance support climate change adaptation in developing countries? Historical investment patterns as a window on future private climate finance. SEI Working Paper No. 2011-05, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett J, O’Neill S (2010) Editorial: maladaptation. Glob Environ Chang 20:211–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barr R, Fankhauser S, Hamilton K (2010) Adaptation investments: a resource allocation framework. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15:843–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett S (2007) Proposal for a new climate change treaty system. Econ Voice. OctoberGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrett S (2008a) Climate treaties and the imperative of enforcement. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 24:239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrett S (2008b) Dikes v. windmills: climate treaties and adaptation. Paper presented at the workshop ‘The Environment, Technology and Uncertainty’, the Ragnar Frisch Centre for Economic Research, OsloGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrett S, Stavins R (2003) Increasing participation and compliance in international climate change agreements. Int Environ Agreements 3:349–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bird N, Brown J, Schalatek L (2011) Design challenges for the Green Climate Fund. Climate Finance Policy Brief No. 4, Heinrich Böll Stiftung North AmericaGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowen A (2011) Raising climate finance to support developing country action: some economic considerations. Clim Pol 11:1020–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown J, Jacobs M (2011) Leveraging private investment: the role of public sector climate finance. Background Note, April 2011. Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Buchner B, Falconer A, Hervé-Mignucci M, Trabacchi C, Brinkman M (2011) The landscape of climate finance. CPI report. Climate Policy Initiative, VeniceGoogle Scholar
  15. Butzengeiger-Geyer S, Michaelowa A, Köhler M, Stadelmann M (2011) Market mechanisms for adaptation to climate change: lessons from mitigation and a pathway to implementation. CIS Working Paper No. 71. ETH Zurich and University of ZurichGoogle Scholar
  16. Carraro C, Massetti E (2012) Beyond Copenhagen: a realistic climate policy in a fragmented world. Clim Chang 110:523–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chaum M, Faris C, Wagner G, Buchner B, Falconer A, Trabacchi C, Brown J, Sierra K (2011) Improving the effectiveness of climate finance: key lessons. Climate Policy Initiative, VeniceGoogle Scholar
  18. Cornes RC, Sandler T (1984) Easy riders, joint production, and public goods. Econ J 94:580–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cornes RC, Sandler T (1996) The theory of externalities, public goods and club goods. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fankhauser S, Burton I (2011) Spending adaptation money wisely. Clim Pol 11:1037–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallastegui MC, Galarraga I, González M (2009) La Ciencia del Cambio Climático: Una Visión General. Papeles de Economía Española 131:1–24Google Scholar
  22. Gibson CC, Andersson K, Ostrom E, Shivakumar S (2005) The samaritan’s dilemma—the political economy of development aid. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Global Climate Network (2010) Investing in clean energy–how can developed countries best help developing countries finance climate-friendly energy investments?. Global Climate Network Discussion Paper No. 4, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Grasso M (2010) An ethical approach to climate adaptation finance. Glob Environ Chang 20:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grasso M (2011) The role of justice in the north–south conflict in climate change: the case of negotiations on the adaptation fund. Int Environ Agreements 11:361–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haites E (2011) Climate change finance. Clim Pol 11:963–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heuson C, Gawel E, Gebhardt O, Hansjürgens B, Lehmann P, Mayer V, Schwarze R (2012) Fundamental questions on the economics of climate adaptation: outlines of a new research programme. UFZ-Bericht, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, No. 05/2012, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  28. Hof AF, den Elzen MGJ, Mendoza Beltran A (2011) Predictability, equitability and adequacy of post-2012 international climate finance proposals. Environ Sci Pol 14:615–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. IPCC (2007) In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Jotzo F, Pickering J, Wood PJ (2011) Fulfilling Australia’s international climate finance commitments: which sources of financing are promising and how much could they raise? CCEP Working Paper No. 1115. Centre for Climate Economics & Policy, Crawford School, Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  31. Krupnick A, Burtraw D, Markandya A (2000) The ancillary benefits and costs of climate change mitigation: a conceptual framework. In: OECD (ed) Ancillary benefits and costs of greenhouse gas mitigation. Paris, 53–93Google Scholar
  32. Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea MD, Falcon WP, Naylor RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319:607–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Markandya A, Galarraga I (2011) Technologies for adaptation: an economic perspective. In: Technologies for adaptation: perspectives and practical experience. Perspectives series 2011, UNEP Risoe Centre, RoskildeGoogle Scholar
  34. OECD (2011) Development perspectives for a post-2012 climate financing architecture. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  35. Persson Å (2011) Institutionalising climate adaptation finance under the UNFCCC and beyond: could an adaptation ‘market’ emerge? SEI Working Paper No. 2011-03, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  36. Persson Å, Klein RJT, Kehler Siebert C, Atteridge A, Müller B, Hoffmaister J, Lazarus M, Takama T (2009) Adaptation finance under a Copenhagen agreed outcome. SEI research report. Stockholm Environment Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  37. Pittel K, Rübbelke DTG (2012) International climate finance and its influence on fairness and policy. World Econ, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  38. Rübbelke DTG (2002) International climate policy to combat global warming: an analysis of the ancillary benefits of reducing carbon emissions. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  39. Rübbelke DTG (2011) International support of climate change policies in developing countries: strategic, moral and fairness aspects. Ecol Econ 70:1470–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schelling TC (1992) Some economics of global warming. Am Econ Rev 82:1–14Google Scholar
  41. Seo SN (2010) A theory of adaptation to climate change as a global public good. USAEE-IAEE-WP 10-041, ClevelandGoogle Scholar
  42. Soltau F (2009) Fairness in international climate change law and policy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stern N (2008) The economics of climate change. Am Econ Rev 98:1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sussman FG, Freed JR (2008) Adapting to climate change: a business approach. Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  45. UNFCCC (2011) Report of the conference of the parties on its sixteenth session; addendum: part two: action taken by the conference of the parties at its sixteenth session. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1Google Scholar
  46. Weitzman ML (2009) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev Econ Stat 91:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. World Bank (2006) Clean energy and development: towards an investment framework. World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis M. Abadie
    • 1
  • Ibon Galarraga
    • 1
  • Dirk Rübbelke
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3)BilbaoSpain
  2. 2.IKERBASQUE–Basque Foundation for ScienceBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations