Ancillary impacts of energy-related climate change mitigation options in Africa’s least developed countries

Original Article

Abstract

This article analyses the debate associated with the ancillary impacts of climate change mitigation options in developing countries, with a particular focus upon Africa’s 34 least developed countries. While these countries’ emissions of greenhouse gases are relatively small (and they do not have emission limitation commitments in the current international regime), inattention to the mitigation agenda would mean that developing countries both miss potential funding opportunities and fail to ‘climate-proof’ their development strategies. A focus, therefore, upon the short-term, local, developmental impacts that serve to change the relative attractiveness of different mitigation options from the perspective of the developing country is in these countries’ current strategic interests. In this article, I examine three energy-related climate change mitigation options: improved cookstoves, carbon-free electricity and improved energy efficiency in industry. Key ancillary impacts are better indoor air quality, better outdoor air quality and job creation (respectively). Further work to strengthen the evidence base regarding these impacts needs to be undertaken, potentially drawing upon broader work that has already been completed. Thus, in conclusion, a call for cross-fertilisation of information between heretofore disparate research communities is made. Additionally, the development of an integrated research agenda, forging linkages among cookstoves, indoor air quality and climate change mitigation research communities in Africa’s least developed countries, is identified as a priority.

Keywords

Developing countries Africa Climate change mitigation Ancillary impacts Ancillary benefits Energy services 

References

  1. Adkins E, Tyler E, Wang J, Siriri D, Modi V (2010) Field testing and survey evaluation of household biomass cookstoves in rural Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development 14:172–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akimoto K, Sanoa F, Hommaa T, Odaa J, Nagashimaa N, Kiia M (2010) Estimates of GHG emission reduction potential by country, sector, and cost. Energ Pol 38(7):3384–3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambec S, Lanoie, P (2008) Does it pay to be green? a systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives 22(4):45–62Google Scholar
  4. Anenberg SC, Horowitz LW, Tong DQ, West JJ (2010) An estimate of the global burden of anthropogenic ozone and fine particulate matter on premature human mortality using atmospheric modeling. Environ Health Perspect 118:1189–1195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azoumah Y, Yamegueua D, Giniesa P, Coulibalya Y, Girarda P (2011) Sustainable electricity generation for rural and peri-urban populations of sub-Saharan Africa: the “flexy-energy” concept. Energ Pol 39(1):131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baer P, Athanasiou T, Kartha S, Kemp-Benedict E (2008) The greenhouse development rights framework: the right to develop in a climate constrained world, 2nd edn. Heinrich Böll Foundation, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Bailis R, Ezzati M, Kammen DM (2003) Greenhouse gas implications of household energy technology in Kenya. Environ Sci Technol 37:2051–2059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bailis R, Ezzati M, Kammen DM (2005) The role of technology management in the dynamics of greenhouse gas emissions from household energy use in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Environ Dev 14(1):149–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbier EB (2010) A global green new deal: rethinking the economic recovery. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Barker T, Bashmakov I, Alharthi A, Amann M, Cifuentes L, Drexhage J, Duan M, Edenhofer O, Flannery B, Grubb M, Hoogwijk M, Ibitoye FI, Jepma CJ, Pizer WA, Yamaji K (2007) Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 619–690Google Scholar
  11. Barnes DF (2007) The challenge of rural electrification: strategies for developing countries, Resources for the Future and Energy Sector Management Assistance Program, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Barnes DF, Khandker SR, Samad HA (2010) Energy access, efficiency and poverty: how many households are energy poor in Bangladesh? World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 5332, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Bazilian M, Outhred H, Miller A, Kimble M (2010) An energy policy approach to climate change. Energy for Sustainable Development 14(4):253–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bell ML, Davis DL, Cifuentes LA, Krupnick AJ, Morgenstern RD, Thurston GD (2008) Ancillary human health benefits of improved air quality resulting from climate change mitigation. Environ Health 7:18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernstein L, Roy J, Delhotal KC, Harnisch J, Matsuhashi R, Price L, Tanaka K, Worrell E, Yamba F, Fengqi Z (2007) Industry. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 447–496Google Scholar
  16. Boko M, Niang I, Nyong A, Vogel C, Githeko A, Medany M, Osman-Elasha B, Tabo R, Yanda P (2007) Africa. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 433–467Google Scholar
  17. Bole T, Saïdi MAR, Bakker SJA (2009) Balancing the carbon market: carbon market impacts of developing country emission reduction targets. Report 500102 030, ECN-B-09-006, Energy Research Centre of the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  18. Bollen J, Guay B, Jamet S, Corfee-Morlot J (2009) Co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies: literature review and new results. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Economics Department Working Papers, No. 693, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Bond T, Venkataraman C, Masera OR (2004) Global atmospheric impacts of residential fuels. Energy for Sustainable Development 8(3):20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. BP (2010) BP statistical review of world energy June 2010. BP, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Bredenkamp H, Pattillo C (2010) Financing the response to climate change. International Monetary Fund, Staff Position Note, SPN10/06, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown D, Seymour F, Peskett L (2008) How do we achieve REDD co-benefits and avoid doing harm? In: Angelsen A (ed) Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options and implications. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), BogorGoogle Scholar
  23. Bryan E, Akpalu W, Yesuf M, Ringler C (2008) Global carbon markets: are there opportunities for Sub-Saharan Africa? International Food Policy Research Institute, Discussion Paper 00832, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Bumpus AG, Cole JC (2010) How can the current CDM deliver sustainable development? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 1(4):541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cairncross F (1991) Costing the earth: the challenge for government, the opportunity for business. Business Books Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Chakravartya S, Chikkaturb A, de Coninckc H, Pacalaa S, Socolowa R, Tavonia M (2009) Sharing global CO2 emission reductions among one billion high emitters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(29):11884–11888ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chuku CA (2010) Pursuing an integrated development and climate policy framework in Africa: options for mainstreaming. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 15:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities Centre (CAI-Asia Centre) (2009) Co-benefits Network Meeting, Pasig City, Philippines, http://cleanairinitiative.org/portal/node/2301, Cited 1 December 2010
  29. Coseby A (2009) Developing country interests in climate change action and the implications for a post-2012 climate change regime. United Nations Development Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. DeSimone LD, Popoff F (1997) Eco-efficiency: the business link to sustainable development. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Dherani M, Pope D, Mascarenhas M, Smith KR, Weber M, Bruce N (2008) Indoor air pollution from unprocessed solid fuel use and pneumonia risk in children aged under five years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull WHO 86(5):390–398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Dickson B, Dunning E, Killen S, Miles L, Pettorelli N (2009) Carbon markets and forest conservation: a review of the environmental benefits of REDD mechanisms. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Dionisio KL, Howie S, Fornace KM, Chimah O, Adegbola RA, Ezzati M (2008) Measuring the exposure of infants and children to indoor air pollution from biomass fuels in The Gambia. Indoor Air 18(4):317–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dixon RK, Scheer RM, Williams GT (2011) Sustainable energy investments: contributions of the global environment facility. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 16:83–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) (2009) Africa review report on sustainable consumption and production, United Nations Economic and Social Council, ECA/FSSD/CFSSD/6/16, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Ellegård A (1996) Cooking fuel smoke and respiratory symptoms among women in low-income areas in Maputo. Environ Health Perspect 104:980–985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ellis K, Baker B, Lemma A (2009) Policies for low carbon growth. Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2010) International energy statistics. Energy Information Administration, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Esty DC, Winston AS (2006) Green to gold: how smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  40. Ezzati M, Kammen DM (2002) The health impacts of exposure to indoor air pollution from solid fuels in developing countries: knowledge, gaps, and data needs. Environ Health Perspect 110(11):1057–1068PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (2001) Initial national communication of Ethiopia to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Ministry of Water Resources, National Meteorological Services Agency, Addis Ababa, http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/ethnc1.pdf. Cited 19 July 2010
  42. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (2010) Nationally appropriate mitigation actions of developing country parties. Environmental Protection Agency, 29 January 2010, Addis Ababa, http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/application/pdf/ethiopiacphaccord_app2.pdf, Cited 10 July 2010
  43. Foster V, Steinbuks J (2009) Paying the price for unreliable power supplies: in-house generation of electricity by firms in Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4913, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  44. Fullerton DG, Bruce N, Gordon SB (2008) Indoor air pollution from biomass fuel smoke is a major health concern in the developing world. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 102(9):843–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fullerton DG, Semple S, Kalambo F, Suseno A, Malamba R, Henderson G, Ayres JG, Gordon SB (2009) Biomass fuel use and indoor air pollution in homes in Malawi. Occup Environ Med 66:777–783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Grantham Institute (2009) Possibilities for Africa in global action on climate change: fact pack, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/43/43573090.pdf. Cited 10 July 2010
  47. Hajat A, Banks D, Aiken R, Shackleton CM (2009) Efficacy of solar power for small-scale businesses in a remote rural area, South Africa. Renewable Energy 34:2722–2727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. He K, Lei Y, Pan X, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Chen D (2010) Co-benefits from energy policies in China. Energy 35:4265–4272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hutton G, Rehfuess E, Tediosi F (2007) Evaluation of the costs and benefits of interventions to reduce indoor air pollution. Energy for Sustainable Development 11(4):34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) Climate change 2001: mitigation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1995) The science of climate change: summary for policymakers and technical summary of the Working Group I report. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2010) Key world energy statistics. International Energy Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
  53. Jochem E, Madlener R (2003) The forgotten benefits of climate change mitigation: innovation, technological leapfrogging, employment, and sustainable development: Working party on global and structural policies. OECD Workshop on the Benefits of Climate Policy: Improving Information for Policy Makers, ParisGoogle Scholar
  54. Karakosta C, Doukas H, Psarras J (2009) Directing clean development mechanism towards developing countries' sustainable development priorities. Energy for Sustainable Development 13:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Khanna M, Rao ND (2009) Supply and demand of electricity in the developing world. Annual Review of Resource Economics 1:20.1–20.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kilabuko JH, Nakai S (2007) Effects of cooking fuels on acute respiratory infections in children in Tanzania. Int J Environ Res Public Health 4(4):283–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kollmuss A, Lazarus M, Lee C, LeFranc M, Polycarp C (2010) Handbook of carbon offset programs: trading systems, funds, protocols and standards. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. Krugmann H (1988) Improved cookstove programs: boon or boondoggle? IDRC Reports 22–23.Google Scholar
  59. Krupnick A, Burtraw D, Markandya A (2000) The ancillary benefits and costs of climate change mitigation: a conceptual framework. In: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (ed) Ancillary benefits and costs of greenhouse gas mitigation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  60. Kumie A, Emmelin A, Wahlberg S, Berhane Y, Ali A, Mekonnen E, Brandstrom D (2009) Magnitude of indoor NO2 from biomass fuels in rural settings of Ethiopia. Indoor Air 19(1):14–21Google Scholar
  61. Labriet M, Caldes N, Izquierdo L (2009) A review on urban air quality, global climate change and CDM issues in the transportation sector. International Journal of Global Warming 1(1–3):144–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Legros G, Havet I, Bruce N, Bonjour S (2009) Energy access situation in developing countries: a review focusing on the least developed countries and sub-Saharan Africa. United Nations Development Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Levine M, Ürge-Vorsatz D, Blok K, Geng L, Harvey D, Lang S, Levermore G, Mehlwana AM, Mirasgedis S, Novikova A, Rilling J, Yoshino H (2007) Residential and commercial buildings. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 387–446Google Scholar
  64. Liverani A (2009) Climate change and individual behavior: considerations for policy, Policy Research Working Paper 5058, The World Bank, Development Economics, Office of the Senior Vice President and Chief Economist, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  65. Lovins AB (1976) Energy strategy: the road not taken? Foreign Aff 55(1):65–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Machado-Filho H (2009) Brazilian low-carbon transportation policies: opportunities for international support. Clim Pol 9:495–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Malyshev T (2009) Looking ahead: energy, climate change and pro-poor responses. Foresight 11(4):33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Markandya A, Armstrong BG, Hales S, Chiabai A, Criqui P, Mima S, Tonne C, Wilkinson P (2009) Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: low-carbon electricity generation. Lancet 374:1953–1955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Masera OR, Díaz R, Berrueta V (2005) From cookstoves to cooking systems: the integrated program on sustainable household energy use in Mexico. Energy for Sustainable Development 9(1):25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McKane A, Price L, de la Rue du Can S (2008) Policies for promoting industrial energy efficiency in developing countries and transition economies. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), ViennaGoogle Scholar
  71. McKinsey & Company (2009) Pathways to a low-carbon economy: version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curveGoogle Scholar
  72. Mehta S, Shahpar C (2004) The health benefits of interventions to reduce indoor air pollution from solid fuel use: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Energy for Sustainable Development 8(3):53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Meinshausen M, Meinshausen N, Hare W, Raper SCB, Frieler K, Knutti R, Frame DJ, Allen MR (2009) Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature 458:1158–1163ADSPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mulugetta Y, Urban F (2010) Deliberating on low carbon development. Energ Pol 38(12):7546–7549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Murray S, Deichmann U, Wheeler D, Meisner C (2010) The economics of renewable energy expansion in rural sub-Saharan Africa, Research Working Papers, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  76. Murty MN, Kumar S (2003) Win-win opportunities and environmental regulation: testing of Porter hypothesis for Indian manufacturing industries. Environ Manage 67(2):139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Naeher LP, Brauer M, Lipsett M, Zelikoff JT, Simpson CD, Koenig JQ, Smith KR (2007) Woodsmoke health effects: a review. Inhal Toxicol 19:67–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nemet G (2010) Technology-led climate policy: alternative perspective. In: Lomborg B (ed) Smart solutions to climate change: comparing costs and benefits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 349–359Google Scholar
  79. Nemet GF, Holloway T, Meier P (2010) Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environ Res Lett 5(1):9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nishimae A (2010) Co-benefits approach: experiences of the World Bank, http://www.iges.or.jp/en/cp/pdf/activity20100311cb/12_0940final.pdf, Cited 1 December 2010
  81. Nweke OC, Sanders WH III (2009) Modern environmental health hazards: a public health issue of increasing significance in Africa. Environ Health Perspect 117(6):863–870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010) Interim report of the green growth strategy: implementing our commitment for a sustainable future. Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level, 27–28 May 2010, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  83. Panwar NL, Kurchania AK, Rathore NS (2009) Mitigation of greenhouse gases by adoption of improved biomass cookstoves. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 14:569–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Paulsson E (2009) A review of the CDM literature: from fine-tuning to critical scrutiny? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 9(1):63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Perpiñan O, Lorenzo E, Castro MA, Eyras R (2009) Energy payback time of grid connected PV systems: comparison between tracking and fixed systems. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 17:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pittel K, Rübbelke DTG (2008) Climate policy and ancillary benefits: a survey and integration into the modelling of international negotiations on climate change. Ecol Econ 68:210–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Porter ME (1991) America's green strategy. Sci Am 264(4):168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rai V, Victor DG (2010) Identifying viable options in developing countries for climate change mitigation: the case of India, International Association for Energy Economics (IAEE) Energy Forum 9–13Google Scholar
  90. Rehfuess EA, Tzala L, Best N, Briggs DJ, Joffe M (2009) Solid fuel use and cooking practices as a major risk factor for ALRI mortality among African children. J Epidemiol Community Health 63:887–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21) (2010) Renewables 2010: global status report. REN21 Secretariat, ParisGoogle Scholar
  92. Sarkar A, Singh J (2010) Financing energy efficiency in developing countries: lessons learned and remaining challenges. Energ Pol 38(10):5560–5571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sasaki N, Yoshimoto A (2010) Benefits of tropical forest management under the new climate change agreement: a case study in Cambodia. Environ Sci Policy 13(5):384–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sathaye J, Masanet E, Lecocq F, Najam A, Schaeffer R, Wart R, Winkler H (2010) Opportunities to change development pathways toward lower greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL-2289E, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  95. Schmidheiny S (1992) Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  96. Sebitosi AB, Okou R (2010) Rethinking the power transmission model for sub-Saharan Africa. Energ Pol 38(3):1448–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Shipley AM, Elliott RN (2006) Ripe for the picking: have we exhausted the low-hanging fruit in the industrial sector? American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Report EA6d0JP5, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  98. Sims REH, Schock RN, Adegbululgbe A, Fenhann J, Konstantinaviciute I, Moomaw W, Nimir HB, Schlamadinger B, Torres-Martínez J, Turner C, Uchiyama Y, Vuori SJV, Wamukonya N, Zhang X (2007) Energy supply. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 251–322Google Scholar
  99. Singh A (2009) Climate co-benefit policies for the Indian power sector: domestic drivers and North–South cooperation. Clim Pol 9(5):529–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Slaski X, Thurber M (2009) Cookstoves and obstacles to technology adoption by the poor. Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies. Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  101. Smith KR, Dutta K, Chengappa C, Gusain PPS, Masera O, Berrueta V, Edwards R, Bailis R, Shields KN (2007) Monitoring and evaluation of improved biomass cookstove programs for indoor air quality and stove performance: conclusions from the household energy and health project. Energy for Sustainable Development 11(2):5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sokona Y (2008) Taking an integrated approach to air pollution and climate change: opportunities and challenges from an African perspective. Background paper for the Global Atmospheric Pollution Forum Stockholm Conference on Air Pollution and Climate Change: Developing a Framework for Integrated Co-benefits Strategies, http://www.sei-international.org/gapforum/conf/papers/Youba-Sokona_(OSS).pdf. Cited 10 July 2010
  103. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  104. Stern LN (2009) Possibilities for Africa in global action on climate change. ScienceAfrican Partnership Forum Special Session on Climate Change, Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
  105. Stickler CM, Nepsted DC, Coe MT, McGrath DC, Rodrigues HO, Walker WS, Soares-Filho BS, Davidson E (2009) The potential ecological costs and cobenefits of REDD: a critical review and case study from the Amazon region. Global Change Biol 15:2803–2824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Timilsina GR, de Gouvello C, Thioye M, Dayo FB (2010) Clean development mechanism potential and challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 15:93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tol RSJ (2005) Adaptation and mitigation: trade-offs in substance and methods. Environ Sci Policy 8:572–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Torres-Duque C, Maldonado D, Pérez-Padilla R, Ezzati M, Viegi G (2008) Biomass fuels and respiratory diseases: a review of the evidence. Proc Am Thorac Soc 5:577–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. United Nations (UN) (2010) List of least developed countries http://www.un.org/esa/policy/devplan/profile/ldc_list.pdf, Cited 30 November 2010
  110. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2009) Trade and development report, 2009. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  111. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2008a) Green jobs: towards decent work in a sustainable low-carbon world, http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=hR62Ck7RTX4%3d&tabid=1377&language=en-US, Cited 10 July 2010
  112. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2008b) UNEP climate change strategy. United Nations Environment Programme, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  113. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, United Nations, FCCC/INFORMAL/84, GE.05-62220 (E) 200705, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  114. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2010a) Non-Annex I national communications, http://unfccc.int/national_reports/non-annex_i_natcom/items/2979.php, Cited 1 December 2010
  115. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2010b) Appendix II - Nationally appropriate mitigation actions of developing country parties, http://unfccc.int/home/items/5265.php. Cited 1 December 2010
  116. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2010c) CDM Projects, http://cdm.unfccc.int/Statistics/index.html. Cited 30 July 2010
  117. Unruh GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12):817–830Google Scholar
  118. Valavanidis A, Fiotakis K, Vlachogianni T (2008) Airborne particulate matter and human health: toxicological assessment and importance of size and composition of particles for oxidative damage and carcinogenic mechanisms. J Environ Sci Health C 26(4):339–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. van Asselta H, Brewer T (2010) Addressing competitiveness and leakage concerns in climate policy: an analysis of border adjustment measures in the US and the EU. Energ Pol 38(1):42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Venkataraman C, Sagar AD, Habib G, Lam N, Smith KR (2010) The Indian national initiative for advanced biomass cookstoves: the benefits of clean combustion. Energy for Sustainable Development 14(2):63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. von Schirnding Y, Bruce N, Smith K, Ballard-Tremeer G, Ezzati M, Lvovsky K (2002) Addressing the impact of household energy and indoor air pollution on the health of the poor: implications for policy action and intervention measures, World Health Organisataion, Paper Prepared for the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, Geneva, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/events/H&SD_Plaq_no9.pdf, Cited 10 July 2010
  122. Wagner M (2003) The Porter hypothesis revisited: a literature review of theoretical models and empirical tests. Centre for Sustainability Management, LüneburgGoogle Scholar
  123. Walley N, Whitehead B (1994) It’s not easy being green. Harv Bus Rev 72(3):36–44Google Scholar
  124. Warwick H, Doig A (2004) Smoke – the killer in the kitchen: indoor air pollution in developing countries. International Technology Development Group Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  125. Wilkinson P, Smith KR, Davies M, Adair H, Armstrong BG, Barrett M, Bruce N, Haines A, Hamilton I, Oreszcyn T, Ridley I, Tonne C, Chalabi Z (2009) Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: household energy. Lancet 374:1917–1929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wittman HK, Caron C (2009) Carbon offsets and inequality: social costs and co-benefits in Guatemala and Sri Lanka. Soc Nat Resour 22(8):710–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. World Bank (2008) The welfare impact of rural electrification: a reassessment of the costs and benefits. Independent Evaluation Group, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. World Bank (2009) World development report 2010. World Bank, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. World Bank (2010a) Population, total. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL, Cited 19 July 2010
  130. World Bank (2010b) CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC, Cited 19 July 2010
  131. World Bank (2010c) Methane emissions (kt of CO2 equivalent). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.METH.KT.CE, Cited 19 July 2010
  132. World Bank (2010d) Nitrous oxide emissions (thousand metric tons of CO2 equivalent). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.NOXE.KT.CE, Cited 19 July 2010
  133. World Bank (2010e) Other greenhouse gas emissions, HFC, PFC and SF6 (thousand metric tons of CO2 equivalent). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.GHGO.KT.CE, Cited 19 July 2010
  134. World Bank (2010f) Improved cookstoves and better health in Bangladesh: lessons from household energy and sanitation programs. World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  135. World Agroforestry Centre (WAC) (2009) Africa’s biocarbon interests: perspectives for a new climate change deal, World Agroforestry Centre, Policy Brief, No. 5, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  136. World Energy Council (WEC) (2010) 2010 Survey of energy resources. World Energy Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
  137. World Health Organization (WHO) (2002) The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  138. World Health Organization (WHO) (2009) Global health risks. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  139. Worrell E, Bernstein L, Roy J, Price L, de la Rue du Can S, Harnisch J (2009) Industrial energy efficiency and climate change mitigation. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, BerkeleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Yamamoto S, Sié A, Sauerborn R (2009) Cooking fuels and the push for cleaner alternatives: a case study from Burkina Faso. Global Health ActionGoogle Scholar
  141. Zusman E (2008) Recognising and rewarding co-benefits in the post-2012 climate regime: implications for developing Asia. The Climate Regime Beyond 2012Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environment and Resource Studies, Faculty of EnvironmentUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations