Space-time discounting in climate change adaptation

Original Article

Abstract

Discounting is traditionally interpreted as the technique for comparing the values of costs and benefits which occur at different points in time. It endeavors to incorporate how humans trade off values to be received in the future versus value received immediately into economic analysis. Interpreted as such, discounting neglects important spatial influences on how values are compared, thereby hindering cost-benefit analyses of climate change adaptation. In this article, we present new theory on space-time discounting and use it to analyze aspects of how humans adapt to climate change. Three climate change adaptation cases are considered. First, analysis of crop indemnity payments to farmers shows that failure to discount across space and time yields inaccurate evaluations of adaptation projects. Second, adaptation efforts of the Commonwealth of Nations show irregular patterns of international cooperation that suggest spatial discounting of adaptation which are not found in temporal discounting. Third, the nexus between climate change, migration, and conflict shows how various forms of space-time discounting can influence whether climate change and migration will lead to conflict. Collectively, these cases demonstrate the analytical power of the space-time discounting theory and also show how the complexity of climate change adaptation can challenge and strengthen this theory. Finally, this article’s analysis demonstrates that proper discounting must include space as well as time.

Keywords

Adaptation Climate change Commonwealth of Nations Conflict Cost-benefit analysis Crop indemnity Discounting Migration 

References

  1. Adams RM, McCarl BA, Mearns LO (2003) The effects of spatial scale of climate scenarios on economic assessments: an example from U.S. agriculture. Clim Change 60(1–2):131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ et al (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP et al (eds) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler MD, Posner EA (2006) New foundations of cost-benefit analysis. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrow KJ, Cline W, Maler KG et al (1996) Intertemporal equity, discounting and economic efficiency. In: Bruce J, Lee H, Haites E (eds) Climate change 1995: economic and social dimensions of climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker T (2008) The economics of avoiding dangerous climate change. An editorial essay on The Stern Review. Clim Change 89(3–4):173–194Google Scholar
  6. Baum SD (2009) Description, prescription and the choice of discount rates. Ecol Econ 69(1):197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley B (1998) Extrinsic value. Philos Stud 91(2):109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butt AT, McCarl BA, Angerer J et al (2005) The economic and food security implications of climate change. Clim Change 68(3):355–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CAG (Commonwealth Advisory Group) (1997) A future for small states: overcoming vulnerability. Commonwealth Secretariat, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. CCGE (Commonwealth Consultative Group on Environment) (2007) Adaptation to climate change: addressing the capacity building and technical assistance needs of highly vulnerable Commonwealth countries. Commonwealth Secretariat, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Commonwealth Secretariat (2009) Commonwealth leaflet. http://thecommonwealth.org/document/181889/34293/39455/141098/the_commonwealth.htm. Cited 14 July 2009
  12. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowen T, Parfit D (1992) Against the social discount rate. In: Laslett P, Fishkin J (eds) Justice between age groups and generations. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  14. Dasgupta P (2008) Discounting climate change. J Risk Uncertainty 37(2–3):141–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dasgupta P, Sen A, Marglin S (1972) Guidelines for project evaluation. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Drèze JP, Stern NH (1987) The theory of cost-benefit analysis. In: Auerbach A, Feldstein M (eds) Handbook of public economics. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  17. Easterling WE, Chhetri N, Niu X (2003) Improving the realism of modeling agronomic adaptation to climate change: simulating technological substitution. Clim Change 60(2–3):149–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Easterling WE, Aggarwal PK, Batima P et al (2007) Food, fibre and forest products. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP et al (eds) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Frederick S (2006) Valuing future life and future lives: a framework for understanding discounting. J Econ Psychol 27(5):667–680Google Scholar
  20. Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit 40(2):351–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hannon B (1987) The discounting of concern: a basis for the study of conflict. In: Pillet G, Murota T (eds) Environmental Economics. R. Leimgruber, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  22. Hannon BM (1994) Sense of place: geographic discounting by people, animals and plants. Ecol Econ 10(2):157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hannon BM (2005) Spatial discounting. Encyc Soc Meas 3:605–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hasselmann K, Barker T (2008) The Stern Review and the IPCC fourth assessment report: implications for interaction between policymakers and climate experts. An editorial essay. Clim Change 89(3–4):219–229Google Scholar
  25. Homer-Dixon TF (1999) Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  26. Jaeger C, Schellnhuber HJ, Brovkin V (2008) Stern’s Review and Adam’s fallacy. Clim Change 89(3–4):207–218Google Scholar
  27. Jones B, Rachlin H (2006) Social discounting. Psych Sci 17(4):283–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones BA, Rachlin H (2009) Delay, probability, and social discounting in a public goods game. J Exp Anal Behav 91(1):61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laslett P, Fishkin J (eds) (1992) Justice between age groups and generations. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  30. Lind RC (ed) (1982) Discounting for time and risk in energy policy. Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Meade JE (1955) Trade and welfare. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Mendelsohn R (2008) Is the Stern Review an economic analysis? Rev Environ Econ Pol 2(1):45–60Google Scholar
  33. Neumayer E (2007) A missed opportunity: the Stern Review on climate change fails to tackle the issue of non-substitutable loss of natural capital. Global Environ Chang 17(3–4):297–301Google Scholar
  34. Ng W, Mendelsohn R (2005) The impact of sea level rise on Singapore. Environ Dev Econ 10(2):210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nordås R, Gleditsch NP (2007) Climate change and conflict. Polit Geogr 26(6):627–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nordhaus WD (2007) A review of the Stern Review on the economics of global warming. J Econ Lit 45(3):686–702Google Scholar
  37. Perrings C, Hannon B (2001) An introduction to spatial discounting. J Regional Sci 41(1):23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pielke R Jr (2007) Mistreatment of the economic impacts of extreme events in the Stern Review report on the economics of climate change. Global Environ Chang 17(3–4):302–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Portney P, Weyant J (eds) (1999) Discounting and intergenerational equity. Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Quiggin J (2008) Stern and his critics on discounting and climate change: an editorial essay. Clim Change 89(3–4):195–205Google Scholar
  41. Rachlin H (2006) Notes on discounting. J Exp Anal Behav 85(3):425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rachlin H, Jones B (2008) Social discounting and delay discounting. J Behav Decis Making 21(1):29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reuveny R (2007) Climate change-induced migration and violent conflict. Polit Geogr 26(6):656–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. RMA (2008) 2007 Crop Year RMA Indemnities As of 04/14/2008. http://www.rma.usda.gov/data/indemnity/2008/041408table.pdf. Cited 30 May 2010
  45. RMA (2009) 2008 Crop Year RMA Indemnities As of 08/17/2009. http://www.rma.usda.gov/data/indemnity/2009/81709table.pdf. Cited 30 May 2010
  46. Rønnow-Rasmussen T, Zimmerman MJ (eds) (2005) Recent work on intrinsic value. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  47. Spash CL (2007) The economics of climate change impacts à la Stern: novel and nuanced or rhetorically restricted? Ecol Econ 63(4):706–713Google Scholar
  48. Stage J (2010) Economic valuation of climate change adaptation in developing countries. Ann NY Acad Sci 1185(1):150–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Sterner T, Persson UM (2008) An even Sterner review: introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Rev Environ Econ Pol 2(1):61–76Google Scholar
  51. Suhrke A (1997) Environmental degradation, migration, and the potential for violent conflict. In: Gleditsch NP (ed) Conflict and the environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers/NATO Scientific Affairs Division, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  52. U.S. Census Bureau (2009a) Annual Estimates of Housing Units for Counties: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008. http://www.census.gov/popest/housing/HU-EST2008-4.html. Cited 30 May 2010
  53. U.S. Census Bureau (2009b) Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates: State and County Data Files. http://www.census.gov/did/www/saipe/data/statecounty/data/index.html. Cited 30 May 2010
  54. Viscusi WK, Aldy JE (2003) The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J Risk Uncertainty 27(1):5–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Watson RT, the Core Team (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: Synthesis report. A contribution of working groups I, II, III to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Weisbach DA, Sunstein CR (2007) Introduction: symposium on intergenerational equity and discounting. Univ Chic Law Rev 74(1):1–3Google Scholar
  57. Weitzman ML (2007) A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. J Econ Lit 45(3):703–724Google Scholar
  58. Weyant JP (2008) A critique of the Stern Review’s mitigation cost analyses and integrated assessment. Rev Environ Econ Pol 2(1):77–93Google Scholar
  59. Yohe GW, Schlesinger ME (1998) Sea-level change: the expected economic cost of protection or abandonment in the United States. Clim Change 38(4):447–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yohe GW, Tol RSJ (2008) The Stern Review and the economics of climate change: an editorial essay. Clim Change 89(3–4):231–240Google Scholar
  61. Zeckhauser RJ, Viscusi WK (2008) Discounting dilemmas: editors’ introduction. J Risk Uncertainty 37:95–106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Rock Ethics InstitutePennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations