Advertisement

A little REDD model to quickly compare possible baseline and policy scenarios for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation

  • Richard G. Dudley
Original Article

Abstract

A simple model allows rapid comparison of typical baseline and policy scenarios which might be considered under international programs to avoid CO2 emissions caused by forest clearing, such as REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation). These tests of REDD policy scenarios can also include CO2 stored in forest products. The value of avoided emissions can also be determined if expected carbon prices, constant or varying, are included. The paper discusses simple illustrative example comparisons as well as possible feedback effects within larger scale setting of CO2 offset availability, CO2 price and emissions reductions.

Keywords

Avoided emissions Carbon emissions CO2 emissions Deforestation Model Emissions reductions REDD Vensim System dynamics 

References

  1. Angelsen A (2008a) How do we set the reference levels for REDD payments? In: Angelsen A (ed) Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options and implications. CIFOR, BogorGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelsen A (ed) (2008b) Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options and implications. CIFOR, BogorGoogle Scholar
  3. Anon (2008) Fact sheet: reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate action. UNFCC, BaliGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown S, Achard F, Braatz B, Csiszar I, DeFries R, Frederici S, Grassi G, Harris N, Herold M, Mollicone D, Pandey D, Pearson T, Shoch D, Souza C (2008) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and degradation in developing countries: a sourcebook of methods and procedures for monitoring, measuring and reporting, GOFC-GOLD, www.fao.org/gtos/gofc-gold/
  5. Cacho OJ, Wise RM, MacDicken KG (2004) Carbon monitoring costs and their effect on incentives to sequester carbon through forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 9:273–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harmon ME, Ferrell WK, Franklin JF (1990) Effects on carbon storage of conversion of old-growth forests to young forests. Science 247:699–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kanninen M, Murdiyarso D, Seymour F, Angelsen A, Wunder S, German L (2007) Do trees grow on money?: the implications of deforestation research for policies to promote REDD, 4. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), BogorGoogle Scholar
  8. Kurz WA, Dymond CC, White TM, Stinson G, Shaw CH, Rampley GJ, Smyth C, Simpson BN, Neilson ET, Trofymow JA, Metsaranta J, Apps MJ (2009) CBM-CFS3: a model of carbon-dynamics in forestry and land-use change implementing IPCC standards. Ecological Modelling 220:480–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Livengood E, Dixon A (2009) REDD and the effort to limit global warming to 2°C: Implications for including REDD credits in the international carbon market, KEA 3 Limited / GreenpeaceGoogle Scholar
  10. Miner R (2006) The 100-year method for forecasting carbon sequestration in forest products in use. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2006Google Scholar
  11. Mollicone D, Freibauer A, Schulze ED, Braatz S, Grassi G, Federici S (2007) Elements for the expected mechanisms on 'reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation, REDD' under UNFCCC. Environmental Research Letters:045024Google Scholar
  12. Okereke C, Dooley K (2009) Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation: towards a post-Kyoto climate agreement. Global Environmental Change In Press, Corrected ProofGoogle Scholar
  13. Peskett L, Harkin Z (2007) Risk and responsibility in reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation. Overseas Development Institute, Forest Policy and Environment ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  14. Pirard R, Karsenty A (2009) Climate change mitigation: should "avoided deforestation" (REDD) be rewarded? Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28:3–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Putz FE, Zuidema PA, Pinard MA, Boot RGA, Sayer JA, Sheil D, Sist P, Vanclay JK (2008) Improved tropical forest management for carbon retention. PLoS Biology 6:e166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rights and Resources Initiative (2008) Seeing people through the trees: scaling up efforts to advance rights and address poverty. Conflict and Climate Change, RRI, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Rudel TK, Coomes OT, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu J, Lambin E (2005) Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change 15:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Skog KE, Nicholson G (1998) Carbon cycling through wood products: the role of wood and paper products in carbon sequestration. Forest Products Journal 48:75–83Google Scholar
  19. Skog KE, Pingoud K, Smith JE (2004) A method countries can use to estimate changes in carbon stored in harvested wood products and the uncertainty of such estimates. Environmental Management 33:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Etna, New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations