Adaptation to climate change in the Northeast United States: opportunities, processes, constraints

  • Susanne C. Moser
  • Roger E. Kasperson
  • Gary Yohe
  • Julian Agyeman
Original Article

Abstract

Scientific evidence accumulating over the past decade documents that climate change impacts are already being experienced in the US Northeast. Policy-makers and resource managers must now prepare for the impacts from climate change and support implementing such plans on the ground. In this paper we argue that climate change challenges the region to maintain its economic viability, but also holds some opportunities that may enhance economic development, human well-being, and social justice. To face these challenges and seize these opportunities effectively we must better understand adaptation capacities, opportunities and constraints, the social processes of adaptation, approaches for engaging critical players and the broader public in informed debate, decision-making, and conscious interventions in the adaptation process. This paper offers a preliminary qualitative assessment, in which we emphasize the need for (1) assessing the feasibility and side effects of technological adaptation options, (2) increasing available resources and improving equitable access to them, (3) increasing institutional flexibility, fit, cooperation and decision-making authority, (4) using and enhancing human and social capital, (5) improving access to insurance and other risk-spreading mechanisms, and (6) linking scientific information more effectively to decision-makers while engaging the public. Throughout, we explore these issues through illustrative sectoral examples. We conclude with a number of principles that may guide the preparation of future adaptation plans for the Northeast.

Keywords

Climate change impacts US Northeast Adaptation Adaptive capacity Social learning Opportunities Constraints 

References

  1. ABC News et al (2006) ABC News/TIME Magazine/Stanford Poll: global warming. ABC News, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79(4):387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adger WN, Vincent K (2004) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. In: Manning M et al (eds) IPCC workshop on describing uncertainties in climate change to support analysis of risk and options. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, pp 49–51Google Scholar
  5. Adger WN et al (2006) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashton A et al (2007) A discussion of the potential impacts of climate change on the shorelines of the Northeastern USA. Technical Paper prepared for the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkhout F, Hertin J, Gann DM (2004) Learning to adapt: organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Tyndall Centre Working Paper 47Google Scholar
  8. Brewer TL (2006) U.S. public opinion on climate change issues: update for 2005. Available at: http://faculty.msb.edu/brewert/documents/USPublicOpinionupdatefor2005.doc; accessed January 12, 2006
  9. Bulatao R, Anderson N (eds) (2004) Understanding racial and ethnic differences in health in late life: a research agenda. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Burton I (1992) Adapt and thrive. Canadian Climate Centre, Downsview, Ontario, unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  11. CBCF (Congressional Black Caucus Foundation) (2004) African Americans and climate change: an unequal burden. Redefining Progress, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Chase L (2006). Climate change impacts in dairy cattle. Available at http://www.climateandfarming.org/pdfs/FactSheets/III.3Cattle.pdf, accessed on 20 July 2006
  13. Clark GE et al (1998) Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: the case of Revere, MA, USA. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 3:59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins K et al (2002) Quality of health care for African Americans: findings from the Commonwealth Fund 2001 Health Care Quality Survey. The Commonwealth Fund, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins K et al (2003) On the edge: low wage workers and their health insurance coverage. The Commonwealth Fund, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. Cox JR et al (2007) Social vulnerability to climate change: a neighborhood analysis of the Northeast U.S. megaregion. Technical paper prepared for the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  17. Daniel B et al (2003) Social capital in virtual learning and distributed communities of practice. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 29(3), available at: http://www.cjlt.ca/content/vol29.3/cjlt29-3_art7.html
  18. Doty M, Ives B (2002) Quality of health care for Hispanic populations: findings from the Commonwealth Fund 2001 Health Care Quality Survey. The Commonwealth Fund, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Dow K et al (2006) Exploring the social justice implications of adaptation and vulnerability. In: Adger WN et al (eds) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 79–96Google Scholar
  20. Easterling DR et al (2000a) Observed variability and trends in extreme climate events: a brief review. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 81(3):417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Easterling DR et al (2000b) Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Easterling W et al (2004) Coping with global climate change: the role of adaptation in the United States. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Ebi KL et al (2006) Some lessons learned from public health on the process of adaptation. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 11(3):607–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. EPA (2006). Excessive heat events guidebook. EPA 430-B-06-005. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Atmospheric Programs, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Epstein P (1994) Framework for an integrated assessment of health, climate change, and ecosystem vulnerability. Ann NY Acad Sci 740:423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Folke C (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frank KT et al (2005) Trophic cascade in a formerly cod-dominated ecosystem. Science 308:1621–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gallopín GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 16:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayhoe K et al (2006) Climate change in the U.S. Northeast: a report of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayhoe K et al (2007a) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the U.S. Northeast. Clim Dyn 28(4):381–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hayhoe K et al (2007b). Quantifying the regional impacts of global climate change: evaluating AOGCM simulations of past and future trends in temperature, precipitation, and atmospheric circulation in the Northeast U.S. Bull Am Meteor Soc (in press).Google Scholar
  32. Holmes TP et al (2005) The economic impacts of hemlock woolly adelgid on residential landscape values: Sparta, New Jersey case study. Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Hemlock Woolly Adelgid in the Eastern United States, Asheville, NC, February 1–3, 2005. In: Onken B, Reardon R (eds), FHTET 2005-01, pp 15–23Google Scholar
  33. Jordan A, O’Riordan T (1995) Institutional adaptation to global environmental change (I): social institutions, policy change and social learning. CSERGE Working Paper GEC 95-20, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE). University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Kalkstein L (1998) Climate and human mortality: relationships and mitigating measures. In: Auliciems A (ed) Advances in bioclimatology: human bioclimatology. Springer, New York, pp 161–177Google Scholar
  35. Kalkstein L, Greene J (1997) An evaluation of climate/mortality relationships in large U.S. cities and the possible impacts of a climate change. Environ Health Perspect 105:75–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karl TR, Knight RW (1998) Secular trends of precipitation amount and frequency in the United States. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 79:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kasperson RE et al (1999) Trust, risk, and democratic theory. In: Cvetkovich G, Lofsted R (eds) Social trust and the management of risk. Earthscan, London, pp 22–44Google Scholar
  38. Kates RW et al (2006) Reconstruction of New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:14653–14660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keen M et al (2005) Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, London, Sterling, VAGoogle Scholar
  40. Kok M et al (2002) Global warming and social innovation: the challenge of a climate-neutral society. Earthscan, London, Sterling, VAGoogle Scholar
  41. Kunreuther HC (2006a) Disaster mitigation and insurance: learning from Katrina. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 604:208–227, MarchCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kunreuther HC (2006b) Reflections on U.S. disaster insurance policy for the 21st century. In: Quigley JM, Rosenthal LA (eds) Risking house and home: disasters, cities, public policy. Berkeley Public Policy Press, Berkeley, CA; also available at: http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/library/06-19.pdf
  43. Kunreuther HC, Michel-Kerjan EO (2006) Climate change, insurability of large-scale disasters and the emerging liability challenge. Paper presented at the University of Pennsylvania, Law Review conference on climate change, Philadelphia, 16–17 November 2006Google Scholar
  44. Lehtonen M (2004) The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecol Econ 49(2):199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luers, AL, Moser, SC (2006) Preparing for the impacts of climate change in California: opportunities and constraints for adaptation. Report prepared for the California Energy Commission (CEC) and California Environmental Protection Agency, CEC-5000-198-SF, CEC, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  46. McCarthy JJ et al (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  47. March JG, Olsen JP (1989) Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics. Free Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  48. McGeehin M, Mirabelli M (2001) The potential impacts of climate variability and change on temperature related morbidity and mortality in the United States. Environ Health Perspect 109(Supplement):85–189Google Scholar
  49. Mirza MMQ (2003) Climate change and extreme weather events: can developing countries adapt? Climate Policy 3:233–248Google Scholar
  50. Moser SC (1994) Wheels of misfortune: a 34-year record of winter storms and their impacts on Massachusetts, USA. Diplom thesis. University of Trier, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  51. Moser SC (2005) Impacts assessments and policy responses to sea-level rise in three U.S. states: an exploration of human dimension uncertainties. Glob Environ Change 15:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moser SC (2006) Communicating climate change-motivating civic action: opportunity for democratic renewal? In: VanDeveer S, Selin H (eds) Climate Change Politics in North America. Wilson Center Occasional Papers No.2, Wilson Center, Washington, DC, pp 109–118Google Scholar
  53. Mulvaney K (2005) Waterfront properties losing insurance. The Providence Journal, February 6, 2005; available at: http://www.projo.com/news/content/projo_20050206_ins6.222b755.html
  54. NEG/ECP Climate Change Steering Committee (2005) Climate change in New England and Eastern Canada: natural resource impacts and adaptation response. Symposium Proceedings, Boston, March 15–16, 2004; available at: http://www.neg-ecp-environment.org/newsletters/News_Adaptation_Symposium_Report.pdf
  55. NOAA-NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (2005) Report on the status of the U.S. fisheries for 2005. NMFS, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC; available at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/docs/Report_text_FINAL3.pdf
  56. O’Riordan T et al (1998) Institutional frameworks for political action. In: Rayner S, Malone EL (eds), Human choice and climate change, vol 1. Batelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp 345–440Google Scholar
  57. Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Towards sustainability in the water sector: the importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat Sci 64:394–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob Environ Change 15(4):308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Putnam J, Allshouse J (2003) Trends in U.S. per capita consumption of dairy products, 1909–2001. Amber Waves 1(3), available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Amberwaves/June03/DataFeature/; accessed 1 August 2006
  61. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. (1962). Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosenzweig C, Solecki WD (2001) Climate change and a global city: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Metro East Coast. Report for the U.S. Global Change Research Program’s U.S. National Assessment. Columbia Earth Institute, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  63. Ross RM et al (2003) Influence of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis L.) on fish community structure and function in headwater streams of the Delaware River basin. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 12:60–65Google Scholar
  64. Sagar A, Banuri T (1999) In fairness to current generations: lost voices in the climate debate. Energy Policy 27:509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sheridan SC, Kalkstein LS (2004) Progress in heat watch-warning system technology. Bull Am Meteor Soc 85(12):1931–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smit B et al (2001) Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. In: McCarthy, JJ et al (eds). Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 877–912Google Scholar
  68. Smith JB et al (2001) Vulnerability to climate change and reasons for concern: a synthesis. In: McCarthy, JJ et al (eds). Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 913–967Google Scholar
  69. Vogel C et al (2007) Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Global Environmental Change (in press)Google Scholar
  70. Williams R (1999) Environmental injustice in America and its politics of scale. Polit Geogr 18:49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wroblewski J (2006) Local management of local stocks. The Navigator: the voice of the marine industry 9(1):74–76Google Scholar
  72. Yohe G, Tol R (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity—moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change 12:25–40Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne C. Moser
    • 1
  • Roger E. Kasperson
    • 2
  • Gary Yohe
    • 3
  • Julian Agyeman
    • 4
  1. 1.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchInstitute for the Study of Society and EnvironmentBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of Geography and George Perkins Marsh InstituteClark UniversityWorcesterUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsWesleyan UniversityMiddletownUSA
  4. 4.Department of Urban and Environmental Policy and PlanningTufts UniversityMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations