Potential effects of climate change and rising CO2 on ecosystem processes in northeastern U.S. forests

  • S. V. Ollinger
  • C. L. Goodale
  • K. Hayhoe
  • J. P. Jenkins
Original Article

Abstract

Forest ecosystems represent the dominant form of land cover in the northeastern United States and are heavily relied upon by the region’s residents as a source of fuel, fiber, structural materials, clean water, economic vitality, and recreational opportunities. Although predicted changes in climate have important implications for a number of ecosystem processes, our present understanding of their long-term effects is poor. In this study, we used the PnET-CN model of forest carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and water cycling to evaluate the effects of predicted changes in climate and atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) on forest growth, C exchange, water runoff, and nitrate (\( {\text{NO}}^{ - }_{3} \)) leaching at five forest research sites across the northeastern U.S. We used four sets of statistically downscaled climate predictions from two general circulation models (the Hadley Centre Coupled Model, version 3 and the Parallel Climate Model) and two scenarios of future CO2 concentrations. A series of model experiments was conducted to examine the effects of future temperature, precipitation, CO2, and various assumptions regarding the physiological response of forests to these changes. Results indicate a wide range of predicted future growth rates. Increased growth was predicted across deciduous sites under most future conditions, while growth declines were predicted for spruce forests under the warmest scenarios and in some deciduous forests when CO2 fertilization effects were absent. Both climate and rising CO2 contributed to predicted changes, but their relative importance shifted from CO2-dominated to climate-dominated from the first to second half of the twenty-first century. Predicted runoff ranged from no change to a slight decrease, depending on future precipitation and assumptions about stomatal response to CO2. Nitrate leaching exhibited variable responses, but was highest under conditions that imposed plant stress with no physiological effects of CO2. Although there are considerable uncertainties surrounding predicted responses to climate change, these results provide a range of possible outcomes and highlight interactions among processes that are likely to be important. Such information can be useful to scientists and land managers as they plan on means of examining and responding to the effects of climate change.

Keywords

Climate change CO2 Forest ecosystems Carbon cycling NPP NEP Nitrogen Nitrate Runoff 

References

  1. Aber JD, Driscoll CT (1997) Effects of land use, climate variation, and N deposition on N cycling and C storage in northern hardwood forests. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 11:639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aber JD, Federer CA (1992) A generalized, lumped-parameter model of photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and net primary production in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. Oecologia 92:463–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aber JD, Ollinger SV, Federer CA, Reich PB, Goulden ML, Kicklighter DW, Melillo JM, Lathrop RG (1995) Predicting the effects of climate change on water yield and forest production in the northeastern United States. Clim Res 5:207–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aber JD, Reich PB, Goulden ML (1996) Extrapolating leaf CO2 exchange to the canopy: a generalized model of forest photosynthesis validated by eddy correlation. Oecologia 106:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aber JD, Ollinger SV, Driscoll CT (1997) Modeling nitrogen saturation in forest ecosystems in response to land use and atmospheric deposition. Ecol Model 101:61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aber JD, Ollinger SV, Driscoll CT, Likens GE, Holmes TR, Freuder RJ, Goodale CL (2002) Inorganic N losses from a forested ecosystem in response to physical, chemical, biotic and climatic perturbations. Ecosystems 5:648–658Google Scholar
  7. Albani M, Medvigy D, Hurtt GC, Moorcroft PR (2006) The contributions of land-use change, CO2 fertilization, and climate variability to the eastern US carbon sink. Glob Chang Biol 12:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alley RB, Clark PU, Huybrechts P, Joughin I (2005) Ice-sheet and sea-level changes. Science 310(5747):456–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolker BM, Pacala SW, Bazzaz FA, Canham CD, Levin SA (1995) Species-diversity and ecosystem response to carbon-dioxide fertilization – conclusions from a temperate forest model. Glob Chang Biol 1(5):373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braswell BH, Sacks WJ, Linder E, Schimel DS (2005) Estimating diurnal to annual ecosystem parameters by synthesis of a carbon flux model with eddy covariance net ecosystem exchange observations. Glob Chang Biol 11:335–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dail DB, Davidson EA, Chorover J (2001) Rapid abiotic transformation of nitrate in an acid forest soil. Biogeochemistry 54:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drake BG, Gonzalez-Meler MA (1996) More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:609–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Driscoll CT, Whitall D, Aber JD, Boyer E, Castro M, Cronan C, Goodale C, Groffman P, Hopkinson C, Lambert K, Lawrence G, Ollinger S (2003) Nitrogen pollution in the northeastern United States: sources, effects and management options. BioScience 53:357–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellsworth DS. (1999) CO2 enrichment in a maturing pine forest: are CO2 exchange and water status in the canopy affected? Plant Cell Environ 22:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster DR, Aber JD (eds) (2004) Forests in time: the environmental consequences of 1000 years of change in New England. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodale CL, Lajtha K, Nadelhoffer KJ, Boyer EW, Jaworski NA (2002) Forest nitrogen sinks in large eastern U.S. watersheds: estimates from forest inventory and an ecosystem model. Biogeochemistry 57(58):239–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodale CL, Aber JD, Vitousek PM (2003) An unexpected nitrate decline in New Hampshire streams. Ecosystems 6(1):75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayhoe K, Wake CP, Huntington TG, Luo L, Schwartz MD, Sheffield J, Wood E, Anderson B, Bradbury J, DeGaetano A, Troy TJ, Wolfe D (2006) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the US Northeast. Clim Dyn 28:381–407, DOI 10.1007/s00382-006-0187-8 Google Scholar
  19. Hegerl GC, Crowley TJ, Hyde WT, Frame DJ (2006) Climate sensitivity constrained by temperature reconstructions over the past seven centuries. Nature 440:1029–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hollinger DY, Goltz SM, Davidson EA, Lee JT, Tu K, Valentine HT (1999) Seasonal patterns and environmental control of carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange in an ecotonal boreal forest. Glob Chang Biol 5:891–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huntington TG (2003) Climate warming could reduce runoff significantly in New England. Agric For Meteorol 117:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Iverson L, Prasad A, Matthews S (2007) Potential changes in suitable habitat for 134 tree species in the northeastern United States. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change (this issue)Google Scholar
  24. Jenkins JC, Kicklighter DW, Aber JD (2000) Regional impacts of climate change and elevated carbon dioxide on forest productivity. In: Mickler R, Birdsey R, Hom J (eds) Responses of northern U.S. forests to environmental change. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Körner C, Asshoff R, Bignucolo O, Hattenschwiler S, Keel SG, Pelaez-Riedl S, Pepin S, Siegwolf RTW, Zotz G (2005) Carbon flux and growth in mature deciduous forest trees exposed to elevated CO2. Science 309:1360–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Likens GE, Bormann FH (1995) Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem, 2nd ed. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Luo Y, Field CB, Jackson RB (2006) Does nitrogen constrain carbon cycling, or does carbon input stimulate nitrogen cycling? Ecology 87:1–2Google Scholar
  28. Medlyn BE, Barton CVM, Broadmeadow MSJ, Ceulemans R, De Angelis P, Forstreuter M, Freeman M, Jackson SB, Kellomaki S, Laitat E, Rey A, Roberntz P, Sigurdsson BD, Strassemeyer J, Wang K, Curtis PS, Jarvis PG (2001) Stomatal conductance of forest species after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration: a synthesis. New Phytol 149(2):247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitchell MJ, McHale PJ, Inamdar S, Raynal DJ (2001) Role of within-lake processes and hydrobiogeochemical changes over 16 years in a watershed in the Adirondack Mountains of New York State, USA. Hydrol Process 15:1951–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murdoch PS, Stoddard JL (1992) The role of nitrate in the acidification of streams in the Catskill Mountains of New York. Water Resour Res 28:2707–2720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakicenovic N et al (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  32. Nowak RS, Ellsworth DS, Smith SD (2004) Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2 – do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytol 162(2):253–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ollinger SV, Smith ML (2005) Net primary production and canopy nitrogen in a temperate forest landscape: an analysis using imaging spectrometry, modeling and field data. Ecosystems 8:760–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Lovett GM, Millham SE, Lathrop RG, Ellis JM (1993) A spatial model of atmospheric deposition for the northeastern U.S. Ecol Appl 3:459–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Federer CA, Lovett GM, Ellis JM (1995) Modeling physical and chemical climate of the northeastern U.S. for a geographic information system. USDA Forest Service GTR NE–191Google Scholar
  36. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Reich PB (1997) Simulating ozone effects on forest productivity. Ecol Appl 7:1237–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Federer CA (1998) Estimating regional forest productivity and water balances using an ecosystem model linked to a GIS. Landsc Ecol 13:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Reich PB, Freuder R (2002) Interactive effects of nitrogen deposition, tropospheric ozone, elevated CO2 and land use history on the carbon dynamics of northern hardwood forests. Glob Chang Biol 8:545–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paradis A, Elkinton J, Hayhoe K, and Buonaccorsi J (2007) Effect of winter temperatures on the survival of hemlock woolly adelgid, Adelges tsugae, and the potential impact of global warming on its future range in eastern North America. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change (this issue)Google Scholar
  40. Peterson BP, Holmes RM, McClelland JW, Vörösmarty CJ, Lammers RB, Shiklomanov AI, Shiklomanov IA, Rahmstorf S (2002) Increasing river discharge to the Arctic Ocean. Science 298(5601):2171–2173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reich PB, Ellsworth DS, Walters MB, Vose JM, Gresham C, Volin JC, Bowman WD (1999) Generality of leaf traits relationships: a test across six biomes. Ecology 80:1955–1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richardson AD, Hollinger DY, Aber JD, Ollinger SV, Braswell BH (2007) Environmental variation is responsible for short- but not long-term variation in forest-atmosphere carbon exchange. Glob Chang Biol 13:788–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwartz MD, Ahas R, Aasa A (2006) Onset of spring starting earlier across the Northern Hemisphere. Glob Chang Biol 12(2):343–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Venterea RT, Groffman PM, Castro MS, Verchot LV, Fernandez IJ, Adams MB (2004) Soil emissions of nitric oxide in two forest watersheds subjected to elevated inputs. For Ecol Manag 196:335–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. V. Ollinger
    • 1
  • C. L. Goodale
    • 2
  • K. Hayhoe
    • 3
  • J. P. Jenkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and SpaceUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeosciencesTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations