Potential effects of climate change on birds of the Northeast

  • N. L. Rodenhouse
  • S. N. Matthews
  • K. P. McFarland
  • J. D. Lambert
  • L. R. Iverson
  • A. Prasad
  • T. S. Sillett
  • R. T. Holmes
Original Article


We used three approaches to assess potential effects of climate change on birds of the Northeast. First, we created distribution and abundance models for common bird species using climate, elevation, and tree species variables and modeled how bird distributions might change as habitats shift. Second, we assessed potential effects on high-elevation birds, especially Bicknell’s thrush (Catharus bicknelli), that may be particularly vulnerable to climate change, by using statistical associations between climate, spruce-fir forest vegetation and bird survey data. Last, we complemented these projections with an assessment of how habitat quality of a migratory songbird, the black-throated blue warbler (Dendroica caerulescens) might be affected by climate change. Large changes in bird communities of the Northeast are likely to result from climate change, and these changes will be most dramatic under a scenario of continued high emissions. Indeed, high-elevation bird species may currently be at the threshold of critical change with as little as 1°C warming reducing suitable habitat by more than half. Species at mid elevations are likely to experience declines in habitat quality that could affect demography. Although not all species will be affected adversely, some of the Northeast’s iconic species, such as common loon and black-capped chickadee, and some of its most abundant species, including several neotropical migrants, are projected to decline significantly in abundance under all climate change scenarios. No clear mitigation strategies are apparent, as shifts in species’ abundances and ranges will occur across all habitat types and for species with widely differing ecologies.


Bicknell’s thrush Catharus bicknelli Bird species modeling Climate change Black-throated blue warbler Dendroica caerulescens Habitat High elevation Northeast Northern hardwoods Spruce-fir Random forests 



This work was supported by grants from Wellesley College, the US National Science Foundation to Wellesley College and Dartmouth College, the Smithsonian Institution, the Trustees and members of the Vermont Institute of Natural Science, the Thomas Marshall Foundation, Stone House Farm Fund of the Upper Valley Community Foundation, the US Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Division, and the Northern Global Change Program of the US Forest Service. We are indebted to our wonderful colleague, the late Raymond O’Connor, for all his early work in spatial assessments of bird distributions.


  1. Ashton AD, Donnelly, JP, Evans, RL (2007) A discussion of the potential impacts of climate change on the shorelines of the Northeastern USA. Mitig Adapt Strat (this issue)Google Scholar
  2. Batzer DP, Wissinger SA (1996) Ecology of insect communities in nontidal wetlands. Annu Rev Entomol 41:75–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Both C, Bouwhuis S, Lessells CM et al (2006) Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird. Nature 441:81–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botkin DB, Janak JF, Wallis JR (1972) Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J Ecol 60:849–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley NL, Leopold AC, Ross J et al (1999) Phenological changes reflect climate changes in Wisconsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9701–9704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JL, Li SH, Bhagabati N (1999) Long-term trend toward earlier breeding in an American bird: a response to global warming? Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 96:5565–5569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cogbill CV, White PS (1991) The latitude–elevation relationship for spruce-fir forest and treeline along the Appalachian Mountain chain. Vegetatio 94:153–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dale VH, Gardner RH, Deangelis DL et al (1991) Elevation-mediated effects of balsam woolly adelgid on southern Appalachian spruce-fir forests. Canad J For Res 21:1639–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delworth TL, Broccoli AJ, Rosati A et al (2005) GFDL’s CM2 global coupled climate models. Part 1: Formulation and simulation characteristics. J Clim 19:643–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desgranges J-L, Ingram J, Drolet B et al (2006) Modelling wetland bird response to water level changes in the Lake Ontario – St. Lawrence River Hydrosystem. Env Mon Assess 113:329–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donovan TM, Thompson FR III, Faaborg J et al (1995) Reproductive success of migratory birds in habitat sources and sinks. Conserv Biol 9:1380–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doran PJ (2003) Intraspecific spatial variation in bird abundance: patterns and processes. Dissertation. Dartmouth College, Hanover, New HampshireGoogle Scholar
  14. Elkins N (1988) Weather and bird behavior. T & AD Poyser, CaltonGoogle Scholar
  15. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (2005) ArcMap GIS, ver. 9.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  16. Foss CR, Richards T, Evans D et al (1994) Atlas of breeding birds in New Hampshire. Chalford Publishing, Dover, New HampshireGoogle Scholar
  17. Galbraith H, Jones R, Park R et al (2002) Global climate change and sea level rise: potential losses of intertidal habitat for shorebirds. Waterbirds 25:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grant PR, Grant BR (1995) Predicting microevolutionary responses to directional selection on heritable variation. Evolution 49:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hale SR (2006) Using satellite imagery to model and map the distribution and abundance of Bicknell’s thrush (Catharus bicknelli). Auk 123:1038–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamburg SP, Cogbill CV (1988) Historical decline of red spruce populations and climatic warming. Nature 331:428–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanski I (1992) Inferences from ecological incidence functions. Amer Nat 139:57–62Google Scholar
  22. Hayhoe K, Wake C, Bradbury J et al (2007) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the U.S. Northeast. Clim Dyn 28:381–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodkinson ID (2005) Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biol Rev 80:489–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holmes RT, Sherry TW (2001) Thirty-year bird population trends in an unfragmented temperate deciduous forest: importance of habitat change. Auk 118:589–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmes RT, Rodenhouse NL, Sillett TS (2005) Black-throated blue warbler (Dendroica caerulescens). In: Pool A (ed) The birds of North America Online
  26. Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Matthews S (2007) Potential changes in suitable habitat for 134 tree species in the northeastern USA. Mitig Adapt Strat (this issue)Google Scholar
  27. Jacobson GL Jr, Webb T III, Grimm EC (1987) Patterns and rates of vegetation change during the deglaciation of eastern North America. In: Ruddiman WF, Wright HE Jr (eds) North America and adjacent oceans during the last deglaciation. Geol Soc Amer, Boulder, pp 277–288Google Scholar
  28. Johnston RF, Selander RK (1971) Evolution in the house sparrow. II. Adaptive differentiation in North American populations. Evolution 25:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kimball KD, Weihrauch DM (2000) Alpine vegetation communities and the alpine-treeline ecotone boundary in New England as biomonitors for climate change. In: McCool SF, Cole DM, Borrie WT, O’Loughlin J (eds) USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-3. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah, pp 93–101Google Scholar
  30. Kullman L (2001) 20th century climate warming and tree-limit rise in the southern Scandes of Sweden. Ambio 30:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambert JD, McFarland KP (2004) Projecting effects of climate change on Bicknell’s thrush habitat in the northeastern United States. VINS Technical Report 04-2. Vermont Institute of Natural Science, Woodstock, VermontGoogle Scholar
  32. Lambert JD, McFarland KP, Rimmer CC et al (2005) A practical model of Bicknell’s thrush distribution in the northeastern United States. Wilson Bull 117:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laughlin SB, Kibbe DP (1985) The atlas of breeding birds of Vermont. University Press of New England, Hanover, New HampshireGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee TD, Barrett JP, Hartman B (2005) Elevation, substrate, and the potential for climate-induced tree migration in the White Mountains, New Hampshire, USA. Forest Ecol Manag 212:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matthews S, O’Connor RJ, Iverson LR et al (2004) Atlas of climate change effects in 150 bird species of the Eastern United States. GTR-NE-318Google Scholar
  36. McPeek MA, Rodenhouse NL, Holmes RT et al (2001) A general model of site-dependent population regulation: population-level regulation without individual-level interactions. Oikos 94:417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller NG, Spear RW (1999) Late-quaternary history of the alpine flora of the New Hampshire White Mountains. Geogr Phys Quater 53:137–157Google Scholar
  38. Nagy LR, Holmes RT (2005) Food limits annual fecundity of a migratory songbird: an experimental study. Ecology 86:675–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nakićenović N, Davidson O, Davis G et al (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  40. Neelin JD, Münnich M, Su H et al (2006) Tropical drying trends in global warming models and observations. PNAS 103:6110–6115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newton I (1998) Population limitation in birds. Academic, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Connor RJ, Jones MT, White D et al (1996) Spatial partitioning of environmental correlates of avian biodiversity in the conterminous United States. Biodivers Lett 3:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Federer CA et al (1995) Modeling the physical and chemical climatic variables across the northeastern U.S. for a Geographic Information System. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-191Google Scholar
  44. Picman J (1988) Experimental study of predation on eggs of ground-nesting birds: effects of habitat and nest distribution. Condor 90:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pope VD, Gallani ML, Rowntree PR et al (2000) The impact of new physical parameterizations in the Hadley Centre climate model-HadCM3. Clim Dyn 16:123–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prasad AM, Iverson LR (2006) Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9:181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pulido F, Berthold P (2004) Miroevolutionary response to climate change. Adv Ecol Res 35:151–183Google Scholar
  48. Reitsma LR, Holmes RT, Sherry TW (1990) Effects of removal of red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) and Eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus) on nest predation in a northern hardwoods forest: an experiment with artificial nests. Oikos 57:375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rich TD, Beardmore CJ, Berlanga H et al (2004) Partners in flight North American landbird conservation plan. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Richardson AD, Lee X, Friedland AJ (2004) Microclimatology of treeline spruce-fir forests in mountains of the northeastern United States. Agric For Meteorol 125:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rimmer CC, McFarland KP, Ellison WG et al (2001) Bicknells thrush (Catharus bicknelli) In: Pool A (ed) The Birds of North America Online’s_Thrush/
  52. Rodenhouse NL (1992) Potential effects of climatic change on migrant landbirds. Conserv Biol 6:263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rodenhouse NL, Holmes RT (1992) Results of experimental and natural food reductions for breeding black-throated blue warblers. Ecology 73:357–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rodenhouse NL, Sherry TW, Holmes RT (1997) Site-dependent regulation of population size: a new synthesis. Ecology 78:2025–2042Google Scholar
  55. Rodenhouse NL, Sillett TS, Doran PJ et al (2003) Multiple density-dependence mechanisms regulate a migratory bird population during the breeding season. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2105–2110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rodenhouse NL, Christenson LM, Parry D, Green LE (2007) Climate change effects on native fauna of Northeastern Forests. Can J For Res (in press)Google Scholar
  57. Root T (1988) Environmental factors associated with avian distributional boundaries. J Biogeogr 15:489–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roth RR, Johnson RK (1993) Long-term dynamics of a wood thrush population breeding in a forest fragment. Auk 110:37–48Google Scholar
  59. Saether BE, Sutherland WJ, Engen S (2004) Climate influences on avian population dynamics. Adv Ecol Res 35:186–209Google Scholar
  60. Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon J (2001) The North American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966–2000.
  61. Sillett TS, Holmes RT (2002) Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle. J Anim Ecol 71:296–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sillett TS, Holmes RT (2005) Long-term demographic trends, limiting factors, and the strength of density dependence in a breeding population of a migratory songbird. In: Greenberg R, Marra PP (eds) Birds of two worlds: advances in the ecology and evolution of temperate–tropical migration systems. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, pp 426–436Google Scholar
  63. Sillett TS, Holmes RT, Sherry TW (2000) Impacts of global climate cycle on population dynamics of a migratory songbird. Science 288:2040–2042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spear RW (1989) Late-quaternary history of high-elevation vegetation in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. Ecol Monogr 59:125–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Steele BB (1992) Habitat selection by breeding black-throated blue warblers at two spatial scales. Ornis Scand 23:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stireman JO III, Dyer LA, Janzen DH et al (2005) Climatic unpredictability and parasitism of caterpillars: implications for global warming. PNAS 102:17384–17387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Strode PK (2003) Implications of climate change for North American wood warblers (Parulidae). Global Change Biol 9:1137–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) (2006) Climate change in the U.S. Northeast: a report of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment. UCS Publications, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  69. US Geological Survey (1999) National elevation dataset. Earth Science Information Center, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  70. Walther G (2001) Adapted behaviour and shifting ranges of species - a result of recent climate warming. In: Walther G-R, Burga CA, Edwards PJ (eds) “Fingerprints” of climate change: adapted behaviour and shifting species ranges. Kluwer, New York, New York pp 1–7Google Scholar
  71. Washington WM, Weatherly JW, Meehl GA et al (2000) Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations. Clim Dyn 16:755–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Webb T III (1992) Past changes in vegetation and climate: lessons for the future. In: Peters RL, Lovejoy TE (eds) Global warming and biological diversity. Yale, New Haven pp 59–75Google Scholar
  73. Webster MS, Marra PP, Haig SM et al (2002) Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. TREE 17:76–83Google Scholar
  74. White DA, Kimmerling AJ, Overton WS (1992) Cartographic and geometric components of global sampling design for environmental monitoring. Cart Geogr Infor Sys 19:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Woodward FI (1992) A review of the effects of climate on vegetation: ranges, competition, and composition. In: Peters RL, Lovejoy TE (eds) Global warming and biological diversity. Yale, New Haven, CT, pp 105–123Google Scholar
  76. Yom-Tov Y, Yom-Tov S, Wright J et al (2006) Recent changes in body weight and wing length among some British passerine birds. Oikos 112:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zumeta DC, Holmes RT (1978) Habitat shift and roadside mortality of scarlet tanagers during a cold, wet New England spring. Wilson Bull 90:575–586Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. L. Rodenhouse
    • 1
  • S. N. Matthews
    • 2
    • 4
  • K. P. McFarland
    • 3
  • J. D. Lambert
    • 3
  • L. R. Iverson
    • 4
  • A. Prasad
    • 4
  • T. S. Sillett
    • 5
  • R. T. Holmes
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesWellesley CollegeWellesleyUSA
  2. 2.School of Natural ResourcesOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Conservation Biology DepartmentVermont Institute of Natural ScienceQuecheeUSA
  4. 4.U. S. Forest ServiceDelawareUSA
  5. 5.Smithsonian Migratory Bird CenterNational Zoological ParkWashingtonUSA
  6. 6.Department of Biological SciencesDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations