A Greenhouse Gas Balance of two Existing International Biomass Import Chains

The Case of Residue Co-Firing in a Pulverised Coal-Fired Power Plant in The Netherlands
Article

Abstract

Various utility companies are considering or already initiated the import of biomass from abroad for electricity generation, especially via co-firing in coal-fired power plants. This results in international logistic biomass supply chains, which raise questions on the environmental performance of such chains. In this study, a life cycle inventory has been performed on two existing biomass import chains to evaluate the greenhouse gas balance of biomass import for co-firing. We considered production, transport and co-firing of wood pellets from Canada and palm kernel shells from Malaysia in a 600 MWe coal-fired power plant in the Netherlands. Those chains are compared with various reference systems for energy production and the alternative use of biomass. Primary energy savings of these import and co-firing chains are between 70% and 100% of the biomass energy content. Net avoided greenhouse gas emissions are in the range of 340–2100 g/kWh. In the most optimistic scenario, pellet co-firing avoids methane emissions that would have occurred if the pellets were decomposed at landfills when not applied for energy production. In the most pessimistic scenario, palm kernel shell co-firing competes with the application as resource for animal feed production, which requires production and transport of an alternative resource. As the energy reference systems of the importing and exporting country and the alternative application of biomass have a significant impact on the net avoided greenhouse gas emissions, these factors should be considered explicitly when studying biomass trade for energy purposes.

Keywords

co-firing international biomass trade life cycle inventory palm kernel shells wood pellets 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agterberg, A. and Faaij, A.P.C.: 1998, Bio-energy trade. Possibilities and constraints on short and longer term, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  2. Barlaz, M.A.: 1998, ‘Carbon storage during biodegradation of municipal solid waste components in laboratory-scale landfills’, Global Biogeochemical Cycles 12(2), 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berndes, G., Hoogwijk, M. and van den Broek, R.: 2003, ‘The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: A review of 17 studies’, Biomass and Bioenergy 25(2), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bingemer, H.G. and Crutzen, P.J.: 1987, ‘The production of methane from solid wastes’, Journal of Geophysical Research 92(D2), 2181–2187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blok, K.: 2001, Energy analysis, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  6. Bogner, J.E.: 1992, ‘Anaerobic burial of refuse in landfills: Increased atmospheric methane and implications for increased carbon storage’, Ecological Bulletins 42, 98–108.Google Scholar
  7. Börjesson, P.: 1996, ‘Energy analysis of biomass production and transportation’, Biomass and Bioenergy 11(4), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boudewijn, R. and Koopmans, W.F.: 2002, Environmental impact report (MER). Co-firing of secondary fuels in the Amer power plant at Geertruidenberg (in Dutch), Essent Energie Produktie B.V., Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  9. Brentrup, F.: 2002, Life Cycle Assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of arable crop production, Ph.D. dissertation, Hannover University, Hannover.Google Scholar
  10. CIEMAT: 1999, ExternE Externalities of Energy, National Implementation, European Commission. Directorate-General XII. Science, Research and Development, pp. 393–398.Google Scholar
  11. CML: 2001, Life Cycle Assessment. An operational guide to the ISO standards, Leiden University, Leiden.Google Scholar
  12. Damen, K. and Faaij, A.P.C.: 2003, A Life Cycle Inventory of existing biomass import chains for “green” electricity production, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  13. Eleazor, W.E., Odle, W.S., Wang, Y. and Barlaz, M.A.: 1997, ‘Biodegradability of municipal solid waste components in laboratory-scale landfills’, Environmental Science & Technology 31, 911–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ericsson, K. and Nilsson, L.J.: 2004, ‘International biofuel trade – A study of the Swedish import’, Biomass and Bioenergy 26(3), 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faaij, A.P.C.: 2005, ‘Bio-energy in Europe: Changing technology choices’, Energy Policy (in press).Google Scholar
  16. FAO: 2002, Fertilizer use by crop, International Fertilizer Industry Association, International Fertilizer Development Center, International Potash Institute, Phosphate and Potash Institute, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  17. Gardner, W.D., Ximenes, F., Cowie, A., Marchant, J.F., Mann, S. and Dods, K.: 2002, ‘Decomposition of wood products in the Lucas Heights landfill facility’, Proceedings of the Third Australian Conference on Life Cycle Assessment, Gold Coast.Google Scholar
  18. Gustavsson, L. and Karlsson, A.: 2002, ‘A system perspective on the heating of detached houses’, Energy policy 30, 552–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamelinck, C.N. and Faaij, A.P.C.: 2001, Joule III COBIOCOWA: Modelling of the Narcea power plant for evaluating the impacts of various co-combustion schemes on plant performance and emissions, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  20. Hamelinck, C.N., Suurs, R. and Faaij, A.P.C.: 2003, International bioenergy transport costs and energy balance, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  21. Hatton, T.: 1999, Canada's wood residues: A profile of surplus and regional concentrations. Prepared for the National Climate Change Process Forest Sector Table, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  22. Hekkert, M.P., Faaij, A.P.C., Hendriks, F. and Neelis, M.L.: 2005, ‘Natural gas as an alternative to crude oil in automotive fuel chains well-to-wheel analysis and transition strategy development’, Energy Policy 33, 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hin, C.J.A.: 2002, Market perspectives for social responsible production of soy, CLM Onderzoek en Advies BV, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  24. Hoogwijk, M.: 2004, On the global and regional potential of renewable energy sources, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  25. Hoogwijk, M., Faaij, A., van den Broek, R., Berndes, G., Gielen, D. and Turkenburg, W.: 2003, ‘Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy’, Biomass and Bioenergy 25(2), 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Husain, Z., Zainac, Z. and Abdullah, Z.: 2002, ‘Briquetting of palm fibre and shell from the processing of palm nuts to palm oil’, Biomass and Bioenergy 22(6), 505–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IEA: 2000, Energy balances of OECD countries 1997–1998, International Energy Agency, Paris.Google Scholar
  28. IEA: 2001, Energy balances of Non-OECD countries 1998–1999, International Energy Agency, Paris.Google Scholar
  29. IPCC: 1997, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Reference Manual: Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories volume 3, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Paris.Google Scholar
  30. Kaltschmitt, M. and Reinhardt, G.A.: 1997, Nachwachsende Energieträger. Grundlagen, Verfahren, ökologische Bilanzierung, Braunschweig, Vieweg.Google Scholar
  31. Kjellström, B.: 2002, ‘Energy inputs for biofuel pellet production and long distance transport’, Prepared for 3rd working group meeting IEA bioenergy task 35, Lulea.Google Scholar
  32. Mahlia, T.M.I., Abdulmuin, M.Z., Alamsyah, T.M.I. and Mukhlishien, D.: 2001, ‘An alternative energy source from palm waste industry for Malaysia and Indonesia’, Energy Conversion and Management 42, 2109–2118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mann, M.K. and Spath, P.L.: 2001, ‘A life cycle assessment of biomass cofiring in a coal-fired power plant’, Clean Production Processes 3, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Micales, J.A. and Skog, K.E.: 1997, ‘The decomposition of forest products in landfills’, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 39(2–3), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Minister of Economic Affairs: 1995, Third Energy Note (in Dutch), Ministry of Economic Affairs, Den Haag.Google Scholar
  36. Neessen, I., Schönherr, I., Nauta, J., van der Linden, L. and Wils, J.: 2003, Food for Thought. Safety Risks of Fodder Chains (in Dutch), Research voor beleid, Leiden.Google Scholar
  37. Patterson, D.: 1988, Commercial Timbers of the World, Aldershot, Gower Technical Press.Google Scholar
  38. Raof, R.A., Tajudin, M.H., Hoak, O.L. and Kon, T.M.: 1999, ‘Fertilizer requirements and practices of the plantation industry in Malaysia’, IFA Regional Conference for Asia and the Pacific, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  39. Sheehan, J., Camobreco, V., Duffield, J., Graboski, M. and Shapouri, H.: 1998, Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel for Use in an Urban Bus. NREL/SR-580-24089, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden.Google Scholar
  40. Tillman, D.A.: 2000, ‘Biomass cofiring: The technology, the experience, the combustion consequences’, Biomass and Bioenergy 19, 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. UNCOMTRADE: 2003, United Nations trade statistics. Oilcake and other solid residues of oil from palm nuts or kernel (commodity 08138). http://unstats.un.org/unsd/comtrade/.
  42. van Loo, S. and Koppejan, J., Eds. (2002). Handbook of Biomass Combustion and Co-Firing; Prepared by Task 32 of the Implementing Agreement on Bioenergy under the auspices of the International Agency. Enschede, Twente University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wambeck, N.: 2002, Oil palm tree matrix.Google Scholar
  44. Wasser, R. and Brown, A.: 1995, Foreign wood fuel supply for power generation in the Netherlands, Netherlands Agency for Energy and the Environment, UNFAO, Utrecht.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science, Technology and Society, Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and InnovationUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations