Advertisement

Minerva

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 1–24 | Cite as

Knowledge, Democracy, and the Internet

  • Nicola MößnerEmail author
  • Philip Kitcher
Article

Abstract

The internet has considerably changed epistemic practices in science as well as in everyday life. Apparently, this technology allows more and more people to get access to a huge amount of information. Some people even claim that the internet leads to a democratization of knowledge. In the following text, we will analyze this statement. In particular, we will focus on a potential change in epistemic structure. Does the internet change our common epistemic practice to rely on expert opinions? Does it alter or even undermine the division of epistemic labor? The epistemological framework of our investigation is a naturalist-pragmatist approach to knowledge. We take it that the internet generates a new environment to which people seeking information must adapt. How can they, and how should they, expand their repertory of social markers to continue the venture of filtering, and so make use of the possibilities the internet apparently provides? To find answers to these questions we will take a closer look at two case studies. The first example is about the internet platform WikiLeaks that allows so-called whistle-blowers to anonymously distribute their information. The second case study is about the search engine Google and the problem of personalized searches. Both instances confront a knowledge-seeking individual with particular difficulties which are based on the apparent anonymity of the information distributor. Are there ways for the individual to cope with this problem and to make use of her social markers in this context nonetheless?

Keywords

Anonymity Democratization of knowledge Division of epistemic labor Experts Internet WikiLeaks 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to two anonymous referees for their extremely constructive comments on an earlier version. Philip Kitcher wishes to thank Wendy Doniger and (especially) M for information about the history of Doniger’s Wikipedia entry. Nicola Mößner’s work was supported by a fellowship within the Postdoc-Program of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

References

  1. APUZ Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte “Digitale Demokratie” 62(7), Feb 2012.Google Scholar
  2. Beam, Michael A., and Gerald M. Kosicki. 2014. Personalized news portals: Filtering systems and increased news exposure. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91(1): 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clifford, William K. 1999. The ethics of belief and other essays. reprinted ed. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  4. Coady, David. 2012. What to believe now: Applying epistemology to contemporary issues. Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Craig, Edward. 1990. Knowledge and the state of nature—An essay in conceptual synthesis. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  6. Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  7. de Laat, Paul B. 2010. How can contributors to open-source communities be trusted? On the assumption, inference, and substitution of trust. Ethics and Information Technology 12(4): 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Laat, Paul B. 2012. Open source production of encyclopedias: Editorial policies at the intersection of organizational and epistemological trust. Social Epistemology 26(1): 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engler, Robert L., James W. Covell, Paul J. Friedman, Philip S. Kitcher, and Richard M. Peters. 1987. Misrepresentation and responsibility in medical research. New England Journal of Medicine 317: 1383–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fallis, Don. 2011. Wikipistemology. In Social epistemology: Essential readings, eds. Alvin I. Goldman, and Dennis Whitcomb, 297–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ferdinand, Peter. 2000. The internet, democracy and democratization. Democratization 7(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feyerabend, Paul. 1978. Science in a free society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Feyerabend, Paul. 1987. Farewell to reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Fleck, Ludwik. 1979 [1935]. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. eds. Thaddeus J. Trenn, Robert K. Merton and Fred Bradley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fleck, Ludwik. 1986 [1947]. To look, to see, to know. In Cognition and fact. Boston studies in the philosophy of science. ed. Robert S. Cohen, 129–151. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  16. Fricker, Miranda. 2010. Epistemic injustice—Power and the ethics of knowing, reprinted ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Frost-Arnold, Karen. 2014. Trustworthiness and truth: The epistemic pitfalls of internet accountability. Episteme 11(1): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodman, Nelson. 1953. Fact, fiction, and forecast. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  19. Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1958. Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, Paul L. 2012. Trusting what you’re told: How children learn from others. Cambridge and London: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacob, Daniel, and Manuel Thomas. 2014. Das Internet als Heilsbringer der Demokratie? APUZ Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 64(22–23): 35–39.Google Scholar
  22. Kitcher, Philip. 1993. The advancement of science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kitcher, Philip. 2011. Science in a democratic society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  24. Kneuer, Marianne (ed.). 2013. Das Internet: Bereicherung oder Stressfaktor für die Demokratie? Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  25. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Laudan, Larry. 1981. A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science 48: 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Longino, Helen E. 2001. The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Magnus, P.D. 2009. On trusting Wikipedia. Episteme 6(1): 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, Boaz, and Isaac Record. 2013. Justified belief in a digital age: On the epistemic implications of secret internet technologies. Episteme 10(2): 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mößner, Nicola. 2010. Wissen aus dem Zeugnis anderer—der Sonderfall medialer Berichterstattung. Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
  31. Mößner, Nicola. 2012. Die Realität wissenschaftlicher Bilder. In Visualisierung und Erkenntnis. Bildverstehen und Bildverwenden in Natur- und Geisteswissenschaften, eds. Dimitri Liebsch, and Nicola Mößner, 96–112. Cologne: von Halem.Google Scholar
  32. Mößner, Nicola. 2013. Photographic evidence and the problem of theory-ladenness. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 44: 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Munn, Nicholas John. 2012. The new political blogosphere. Social Epistemology 26(1): 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neurath, Otto. 1991. Gesammelte Bildpädagogische Schriften. Ed. Rudolf Haller, Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
  35. Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik Conway. 2008. Merchants of doubt. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  36. Pfister, Damien Smith. 2011. Networked expertise in the era of many-to-many communication: On Wikipedia and intervention. Social Epistemology 25(3): 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sanger, Lawrence M. 2009. The fate of expertise after Wikipedia. Episteme 6(1): 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sellars, Wilfrid. 1953. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  39. Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the air-pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Shirky, Clay. 2009. A speculative post on the idea of algorithmic authority. http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/11/a-speculative-post-on-the-idea-of-algorithmic-authority/. Accessed 05 October 2016.
  41. Simon, Judith. 2010. The entanglement of trust and knowledge on the web. Ethics and Information Technology 12(4): 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simpson, Thomas W. 2012. Evaluating Google as an epistemic tool. Metaphilosophy 43(4): 426–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sunstein, Cass R. 2007. Republic.Com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sunstein, Cass R. 2008. Democracy and the internet. In Information technology and moral philosophy, eds. Jeroen Hoven, and John Weckert, 93–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Thurman, Neil. 2011. Making ‘the daily me’: Technology, economics and habit in the mainstream assimilation of personalized news. Journalism 12(4): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations