Recent Developments in China–U.S. Cooperation in Science
China’s remarkable gains in science over the past 25 years have been well documented but it is less well known that China and the United States have become each other’s top collaborating country. Science and technology has been a primary vehicle for growing the bilateral relationship between China and the United States since the opening of relations between the two countries in the late 1970s. During the early 2000s, the scientific relationship between China and the United States—as measured in coauthored papers—showed significant growth (Jin et al. in Journal of Shanxi University 30(2):295–302, 2007). Chinese scientists claim first authorship much more frequently than U.S. counterparts by the end of the decade. The sustained rate of increase of collaboration with one other country is unprecedented on the U.S. side. Even growth in relations with eastern European nations does not match the growth in the relationship between China and the United States. Both countries can benefit from the relationship, but for the U.S., greater benefit would come from a more targeted strategy.
KeywordsChina United States Research and development Science Science policy Global relations Russia
- Adams, Jonathan. 2010. Get ready for China’s domination of science. New Scientist, 6 Jan., P. 2742.Google Scholar
- Archambault, Eric. 2010. Thirty Years in Science: Secular Movements in Knowledge Creation. Report, Science-Metrix.com.
- Bornmann, Lutz, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2011. Which cities produce worldwide excellent papers more than can be expected? A new mapping approach-Using Google Maps-based on statistical significance testing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(10): 1954–1962.Google Scholar
- Bornmann, Lutz, Caroline Wagner, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2015. BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently-cited papers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST). doi: 10.1002/asi.23333.
- Branstetter, Lee, Guangwei Li, and Francisco Veloso. 2013. The Globalization of R&D: China, India, and the Rise of international Co-invention. Informal paper. Carnegiemellon.edu.
- Braun, T. 2005. Keeping the gates of science journals: Gatekeeping indicators of national performance in the sciences. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S & T systems, eds. H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel and U. Schmoch, 95–114. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Cao, Cong, Richard P. Suttmeier, and Denis F. Simon. 2006. China’s 15-year Science and Technology Plan. Physics Today 59(12): 38.Google Scholar
- Cassiolato, Jose Eduardo, and Helena M. Lastres. 2011. Science, technology and innovation policies in the BRICS countries: An introduction. In BRICS and development alternatives: Innovation systems and policies, eds. José Eduardo Cassiolato and Virginia Vitorino, 1–34. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
- Chen, David. 2011. China’s Program for Science and Technology Modernization: Implications for American competitiveness. Centra technologies report for the U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission.Google Scholar
- Duque, Ricardo B., Marcus Ynalvez, Paul Mbatia, R. Sooryamoorthy, Dan-Bright Dzorgbo, and Wesley Shrum. 2005. Collaboration paradox: Scientific productivity, the Internet, and problems of research in developing areas. Social Studies of Science 35(5): 755–785.Google Scholar
- Freeman, Richard B. 2006. Does globalization of the scientific/engineering workforce threaten US economic leadership? In Innovation policy and the economy, vol. 6, eds. Adam B. Jaffe, Josh Lerner, and Scott Stern, 123–158. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Institute of International Education. 2014. Open doors report, 2013. http://www.iie.org/research-and-publications/open-doors. Accessed 13 April 2014.
- Jin, Bihui, and Ronald Rousseau. 2005b. China’s quantitative expansion phase: Exponential growth but low impact. In Proceedings of ISSI 2005 (Ingwersen & Larsen, eds.), 362–370.Google Scholar
- Jin, Bihui, Richard P. Suttmeier, Z. Wang, Cong Cao, D. Wang, and Q. Zhou. 2007. Sino–U.S. science collaboration: An analysis in bibliometrics. Journal of Shanxi University (Natural Science Edition) 30(2): 295–302.Google Scholar
- Jin, Xioming. 2003. China–US Relations in Science, Conference Paper. http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~chinaus/publications/. Accessed April 2014.
- Katz, J. Sylvan, and Ben R. Martin. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
- Leydesdorff, Loet, and Caroline S. Wagner. 2008. International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics 2(4): 317–325.Google Scholar
- Leydesdorff, Loet, Caroline S. Wagner, and Lutz Bornmann. 2014. The European Union, China, and the United States in the Top-1% and Top-10% Layers of Most-Frequently-Cited Publications: Competition and collaborations. Journal of Informetrics 8(3): 606–617.Google Scholar
- National Science Board. 2000. Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
- National Science Board. 2010. Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
- National Science Board. 2012. Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
- National Science Board. 2014. Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
- OECD. 2008, Main science and technology indicators, vol. 2008/1. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Pentland, W. 2011. Congress Bans Scientific Collaboration with China, Cites High Espionage Risks. Forbes, May 7, 2011. Accessed April 2014.Google Scholar
- Royal Society. 2011. Knowledge, networks, and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
- Shelton, Robert Duane, and Patricia Foland. 2009. The race for world leadership of science and technology: status and forecasts. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, pp. 369–380.Google Scholar
- Springut, Micah, Stephen Schlaikjer, and David Chen. 2011. China’s Program for Science and Technology Modernization: Implications for American Competitiveness: Prepared for the US–China Economic and Security Review Commission. CENTRA Technology.Google Scholar
- Sun, Fuquan. 2012. International Science and Technology Cooperation of China: Evolution, Progress and Achievements, Problems and Prospects. Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development, internal paper.Google Scholar
- Suttmeier, Richard P. 2008. State, self-organization, and identity in the building of Sino–US cooperation in science and technology. Asian Perspective 32(1): 5–31.Google Scholar
- Suttmeier, Richard P. 2010. From Cold War science diplomacy to partnering in a networked world: 30 years of Sino–US relations in science and technology. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China 1(1): 18–28.Google Scholar
- Tang, Li, and Philip Shapira. 2011. China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics 88(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2010. UNESCO science report 2010. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Van Leeuwen, T.N., Henk Moed, Robert Tijssen, M.S. Visser, and Ton van Raan. 2000. First evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the evaluation of national science systems. Research Evaluation 9(2): 155–156.Google Scholar
- Wagner, Caroline S., Irene Brahmakulam, D.J. Peterson, Linda Staheli, and Anny Wong. 2002. U.S. Government funding of science and technology cooperation with Russia. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1504.html.
- Wagner, Caroline, and Loet Leydesdorff. (in preparation). Implications for U.S. science policy of the growth of global science.Google Scholar
- Wilsdon, James, and J. Keeley. 2007. China: The next science superpower. London: Demos.Google Scholar