Advertisement

Minerva

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 443–464 | Cite as

Techno-Nationalism and the Construction of University Technology Transfer

  • Creso Sá
  • Andrew Kretz
  • Kristjan Sigurdson
Article

Abstract

Our historical study of Canada’s main research university illuminates the overlooked influence of national identities and interests as forces shaping the institutionalization of technology transfer. Through the use of archival sources we trace the rise and influence of Canadian technological nationalism—a response to Canada’s perceived dependency on the United States’ science and technology. Technological nationalism provided a symbol for producing a shared understanding of the desirability and appropriateness of technology transfer that legitimated the commercial activities of university scientists.

Keywords

Technology transfer Canada Techno-nationalism Institutionalization Research commercialization Universities 

References

  1. Archibugi, Daniele, and Jonathan Michie. 1997. Technological globalization or national systems of innovation? Futures 29(2): 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet. 2006. Public science, private interests: Culture and commerce in Canada’s networks of centres of excellence. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  3. AUCC—Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada. 2006. Investing in university research: Building a strong foundation for Canada’s economic future. Ottawa, ON: AUCC.Google Scholar
  4. Berman, Elizabeth P. 2012. Explaining the move toward the market in academic science: How institutional logics can change without institutional entrepreneurs. Theory and Society 41: 261–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brassard, Daniel. 1996. Science and technology: The new federal policy (parliamentary research branch background paper BP-414E). Ottawa: Library of Parliament.Google Scholar
  6. Canada. 1951. Royal commission on national development in the arts, letters, and sciences (Report). Ottawa: King’s Printer.Google Scholar
  7. Canada. 1963. The royal commission on government organization (Report 4). Ottawa: King’s Printer.Google Scholar
  8. Carter, Luther J. 1966. Canada: Science advisors to propose priorities. Science 153(3740): 1083–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CCA—Council of Canadian Academies. 2009. Innovation and business strategy: Why Canada falls short. Ottawa, Canada: CCA.Google Scholar
  10. Cormier, Jeffrey. 2004. The Canadianization movement: Emergence, survival, and success. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dill, David, and Frans van Vught. 2010. Introduction. In National innovation and the academic research enterprise: Public policy in global perspective, eds. David Dill, and Frans Van Vught, 1–26. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dufour, Paul, and Yves Gingras. 1988. Development of Canadian science and technology policy. Science and Public Policy 15(1): 13–18.Google Scholar
  13. Edler, Jakob, and Patries Boekholt. 2001. Benchmarking national public policies to exploit international science and industrial research: A synopsis of current developments. Science and Public Policy 28(4): 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edquist, Charles, and Björn Johnson. 1997. Institutions and organisations in systems of innovation. In Systems of innovation: Technology, institutions and organizations, ed. Charles Edquist, 41–63. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  15. Eggleston, Wilfrid. 1950. Scientists at war. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Feldberg, Georgina. 1991. The origins of organized Canadian medical research: The National Research Council’s associate committee on tuberculosis research, 1924–1938. Scientia Canadensis: Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine 15.2(41): 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher, Donald, and Knell Rubenson. 2010. Canada. In National innovation and the academic research enterprise: Public policy in global perspective, eds. David Dill, and Frans Van Vught, 62–116. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, Chris. 1995. The ‘national system of innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19: 5–24.Google Scholar
  19. Friedland, Martin L. 2002. The University of Toronto: A history. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  20. Geiger, Roger, and Creso Sá. 2009. Technology transfer offices and the commercialisation of university research in the United States. In The research mission of the university: Reforms and response, eds. Patrick Clancy, and David Dill, 177–196. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Gingras, Yves. 1991. Physics and the rise of scientific research in Canada. Montréal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gingras, Yves, Pierrick Malissard, and Jean-François Auger. 2000. Les conditions d’émergence des «conflits d’intérets» dans le champ universitaire. Éthique publique 2(2): 126–137.Google Scholar
  23. Grove, J.W. 1989. In defense of science: Science, technology, and politics in modern society. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hampson, H. Anthony. 1972. The Canada development corporation. In Club of Canada addresses, ed. The Empire, 244–262. Toronto: The Empire Club Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. Insulin Committee of the University of Toronto. 1923. Insulin: It’s action, its therapeutic value in diabetes, and its manufacture. The Canadian Medical Association Journal 13(7): 480–486.Google Scholar
  26. Jarrell, Richard J. 2001. Canada-relations to science in the United States. In The history of science in the United States: An encyclopedia, ed. Marc Rothenberg, 103–104. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  27. Jarrell, Richard J., and Yves Gingras. 1991. Introduction: Building Canadian science. Scientia Canadensis: Canadian Journal of the History Of Science Technology and Medicine 15.2(41): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malissard, Pierrick. 2000. Les “start-up” de jadis: la production de vaccins au Canada. Sociologie et sociétés 32(1): 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matkin, Gary W. 1990. Technology transfer and the university. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  30. McDougall, John N. 2006. Drifting together: The political economy of Canada-US integration. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  31. Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowen. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Montresor, Sandro. 2001. Techno-globalism, techno-nationalism and technological systems: Organizing the evidence. Technovation 21(7): 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morton, D. 1986. The new democrats: 1961–1986, 3rd ed. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman Ltd.Google Scholar
  34. Mowery, David C., Richard Nelson, Bhaven Sampat, and Arvids Ziedonis. 2004. Ivory tower and industrial innovation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Narula, Rajneesh, and John H. Dunning. 1998. Explaining international R&D alliances and the role of governments. International Business Review 7(4): 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nash, Knowlton. 1994. The microphone wars. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Inc.Google Scholar
  37. OECD—Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1969. Review of national science policy: Canada. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Ostry, Sylvia, and Richard R. Nelson. 1995. Techno-nationalism and techno-globalism: Conflict and cooperation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  39. Phillipson, Donald. 1974. Medical research policy for Canada. Part II: Will the medical research council survive new organizational proposals? Canadian Medical Association Journal 3(1): 58–68.Google Scholar
  40. Phillipson, Donald. 1991. The National Research Council of Canada: Its historiography, its chronology, its bibliography. Scientia Canadensis: Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine 15.2(41): 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reich, Robert. 1987. The rise of techno-nationalism. The Atlantic Monthly 259(5): 63–69.Google Scholar
  42. Russell, Loris. 1980. Invention and discovery. In Science, technology and Canadian history, eds. Richard A. Jarrell, and Norman R. Ball, 120–130. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Sá, Creso. 2010. Canadian provinces and public policies for university research. Higher Education Policy 23: 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sá, Creso, and Jeffrey Litwin. 2011. University–industry research collaborations in Canada: the role of federal policy instruments. Science and Public Policy 38(6): 425–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stuart, Reginald C. 2007. Dispersed relations: Americans and Canadians in upper North America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Swartz, Jaqueline. 1979. BIDU: Linking industry and U of T researchers to make a dent in the American monopoly of medical instruments. December: University of Toronto Bulletin. 17.Google Scholar
  47. University of Toronto. 1984. Excellence and diversity: The University of Toronto’s submission to the commission on the future development of the universities of Ontario. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  48. University of Toronto. 2005. Office of the vice-president, research and associate provost, 2004–2005 report / 2005–2006 plans. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  49. University of Toronto. 2009. Excellence, innovation, leadership: Research at the University of Toronto. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  50. Yamada, Atsushi. 2000. Neo-techno-nationalism: How and why it grows. Paper presented to the international studies association conference, 14–18 March, in Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  51. Zeller, Suzanne. 2009. Inventing Canada: Early Victorian science and the idea of a transcontinental nation. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Leadership, Higher, and Adult EducationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations