, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 191–196 | Cite as

Opportunities and Challenges in the Use of Innovation Prizes as a Government Policy Instrument

  • Luciano Kay


Inducement prizes have been long used to stimulate individuals and groups to accomplish diverse goals. Lately, governments have become more and more interested in these prizes and sought to include this kind of incentives within the set of policy tools available to promote science, technology, and innovation. To date, however, there has been little empirically-based scientific knowledge on how to design, manage, and evaluate innovation prizes. This note discusses aspects of the prize phenomenon and the opportunities and challenges related with the use of innovation prizes as a government policy instrument. Compared to other incentive mechanisms, prizes are likely to present advantages to, for example, accelerate the development and commercialization of technologies that are held back for diverse reasons and help to leverage public money with external ideas, collaborative efforts, and the participation of diverse individuals and organizations. Still, despite these advantages and other interesting features of prizes, there are key questions that policy-makers and scholars must address to better understand this kind of incentives and further improve prize designs and implementations before governments move forward to a more widespread use of innovation prizes in science and technology policies.


Innovation prizes Science and technology policy Science and technology policy studies Policy instruments 



This work is supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant Number SBE-0965103. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this work are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.


  1. Best, Joel. 2008. Prize Proliferation. Sociological Forum 23: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunt, Liam, Josh Lerner, and Tom Nicholas. 2008. Inducement Prizes and Innovation: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).Google Scholar
  3. Crosland, Maurice, and Antonio Galvez. 1989. The Emergence of Research Grants within the Prize System of the French Academy of Sciences, 1795-1914. Social Studies of Science 19(1): 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis, Lee, and Jerome Davis. 2004. How Effective Are Prizes As Incentives To Innovation? Evidence From Three 20th Century Contests. Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2004, Elsinore, Denmark.Google Scholar
  5. de Laat, Eric A.A. 1997. Patents or prizes: Monopolistic R&D and asymmetric information. International Journal of Industrial Organization 15(3): 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kay, Luciano. 2011a. The effect of inducement prizes on innovation: evidence from the Ansari XPrize and the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge. R&D Management 41(4): 360–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kay, Luciano. 2011b. How Do Prizes Induce Innovation? Learning From The Google Lunar X-Prize. Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  8. Kay, Luciano. 2011c. Managing Innovation Prizes in Government. Washington, D.C.: The IBM Center for the Business of Government.Google Scholar
  9. MacLeod, Roy M. 1971. Of Medals and Men: A Reward System in Victorian Science, 1826-1914. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 26(1): 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maryniak, Gregg. 2005. When will we see a Golden Age of Spaceflight? Space Policy 21: 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mokyr, Joel. 2009. Intellectual Property Rights, the Industrial Revolution, and the Beginnings of Modern Economic Growth. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 99(2): 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. National Academy of Engineering (NAE). 1999. Concerning Federally Sponsored Inducement Prizes in Engineering and Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Engineering.Google Scholar
  13. National Research Council (NRC). 2007. Innovation Inducement Prizes at the National Science Foundation. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  14. Newell, Richard G., and Nathan E. Wilson. 2005. Technology Prizes for Climate Change Mitigation. In Discussion Paper. Washington, D.C.: Resources For The Future.Google Scholar
  15. Saar, Jüri. 2006. Prizes: The Neglected Innovation Incentive. Lund University.Google Scholar
  16. Shavell, Steven, and Tanguy van Ypersele. 1999. Rewards Versus Intellectual Property Rights: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).Google Scholar
  17. Stine, Deborah D. 2009. Federally Funded Innovation Inducement Prizes: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  18. Wright, Brian D. 1983. The Economics of Invention Incentives: Patents, Prizes, and Research Contracts. American Economic Review 73(4): 691.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgia Tech Program in Science, Technology and Innovation PolicyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations