Association of American Universities. 2002. ITAR and universities: Universities are educational institutions, not munitions manufacturers
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences
. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Branscomb, Lewis M. 1993. Empowering technology: Implementing a U.S. strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brooks, Harvey. 1990. Lessons of history: Successive challenges to science policy. In The research system in transition, eds. Susan Cozzens, Peter Healey, and John Ziman, 11–22, NATO Science Series 57. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Carter, Ashton B. 2010. Under Secretary of Defense Memorandum for Secretaries of the Military Departments. US Department of Defense. http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/research.pdf
Chalk, Rosemary. 1986. Continuing debate over science and secrecy. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: 14–16.
Commission on Scientific Communication and National Security. 2005. Security controls on scientific information and the conduct of scientific research. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Homeland Security Program.
Committee on Loyalty in Relation to Government Support of Unclassified Research. 1956. Loyalty and research. Science 123(3199), New Series (April 20): 660–662.
Cook, Sharron, ed. 2005. Record of comments: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking: Revision and clarification of deemed export related regulatory requirements (70 FR 15607 & 70 FR 30655). US Department of Commerce.
Coriat, Benjamin, and Fabienne Orsi. 2002. Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States: Origins, content and problems. Research Policy
31(8–9) (December): 1491–1507. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00078-1
Cupitt, Richard T. 2000. Reluctant champions: U.S. presidential policy and strategic export controls, Truman, Eisenhower, Bush, and Clinton. New York: Routledge.
Davey, Michael E. 1986. DOD Support for research at colleges and universities. In Science policy study, background report no. 8: Science support by the Department of Defense, ed. Genevieve J. Knezo, 133–176. CRS Reports SPR-0023. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
Deemed Export Advisory Committee. 2007. The deemed export rule in an era of globalization. US Department of Commerce.
Defense Science Board Task Force on Export of U.S. Technology. 1976. An analysis of export control of U.S. technology—a DoD perspective. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering.
Defense Science Board Task Force on Secrecy. 1970. Final report (The Seitz Report). US Department of Defense.
Erasmus University Medical Center. 2011. Virologists to observe American bioterrorism recommendation
. Erasmus MC. http://www.erasmusmc.nl/perskamer/archief/2011/3530639/?lang=en
Evans, Samuel A. 2009. Technological ambiguity & the Wassenaar arrangement
. DPhil Thesis: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office. 2002. Export controls: Department of commerce controls over transfers of technology to foreign nationals need improvement. GAO-02-972.
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review
48(6): 781–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. University of Chicago Press.
Government Accountability Office. 2006a. Export controls: Agencies should assess vulnerabilities and improve guidance for protecting export-controlled information at universities. GAO-07-70.
Government Accountability Office. 2006b. Export controls: Agencies should assess vulnerabilities and improve guidance for protecting export-controlled information at companies. GAO-07-69. Washington, D.C.
Government Accountability Office. 2011. Export controls: Improvements needed to prevent unauthorized technology releases to foreign nationals in the United States. GAO-11-354. Washington, D.C.
Grady, Denise, and William J. Broad. 2011. U.S. asks journals to censor articles on bird flu virus. The New York Times
, December 20, sec. Health. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/21/health/fearing-terrorism-us-asks-journals-to-censor-articles-on-virus.html
Guston, David H. 2000. Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guston, David H. 2001. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values
26(4): 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, Catherine. 2011. What really happened in malta this september when contagious bird flu was first announced? Observations, scientific American blog network
Hart, David M. 1998. Forged consensus: Science, technology, and economic policy in the United States, 1921–1953. Princeton studies in American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Henry, Matthew, and John L. Turner. 2005. The court of appeals for the federal circuit’s impact on patent litigation. SSRN eLibrary
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Jeffrey J. Schott, and Kimberly Ann Elliott. 1990. Economic sanctions reconsidered: History and current policy. Peterson Institute.
Knezo, Genevieve J. 1990. Defense basic research priorities: Funding and policy issues
. CRS Reports 90-506 SPR. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. http://www.lexisnexis.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-1990-SPR-0013
Krause, Keith. 1992. Arms and the state: Patterns of military production and trade. Cambridge studies in international relations 22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The methodology of scientific research programmes. His Philosophical Papers; V. 1. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leath, Audrey T. 2001. ITAR regulation of research satellites generates concern. FYI: The AIP Bulletin of Science Policy News
(110) (August 30). http://www.aip.org/fyi/2001/110.html
Li, F.C.K, B.C.K. Choi, T. Sly, and A.W.P. Pak. 2008. Finding the real case-fatality rate of H5N1 avian influenza. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
62(6)(June): 555–559. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.064030
Lunney, Glynn S. 2004. Patent law, the federal circuit, and the Supreme Court: A quiet revolution. Supreme Court Economic Review
11(January 1): 1–80.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C. 2004. Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States. Innovation and Technology in the World Economy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2007. Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2009. Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5/Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
National Institutes of Health. 2012. U.S. government policy for oversight of life sciences dual use research of concern
. Office of Biotechnology Activities, NIH. http://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/biosecurity/PDF/United_States_Government_Policy_for_Oversight_of_DURC_FINAL_version_032812.pdf
National Research Council. 2002. Making the nation safer: The role of science and technology in countering terrorism
. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2004. Biotechnology research in an age of terrorism: Confronting the dual use dilemma—“The Fink Report”
. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2005. Assessment of Department of Defense Basic Research by the Committee on Department of Defense Basic Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2007. Science and security in a post 9/11 world: A report based on regional discussions between the science and security communities
. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12013.html
National Research Council. 2009. Beyond “Fortress America”: National Security Controls on Science and Technology in a Globalized World/Committee on Science, Security, and Prosperity [and] Committee on Scientific Communication and National Security, Development, Security, and Cooperation, Policy and Global Affairs. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity. 2011. Press statement on the NSABB review of H5N1 research
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity. 2012. March 29-30, 2012 Meeting of the National Science Advisory Board for biosecurity to review revised manuscripts on transmissibility of A/H5N1 influenza virus
National Science Foundation. 2011. Globalization of science and engineering research: A companion to S&E indicators 2010
National Security Council. 1985. NSDD-189: National policy on the transfer of scientific, technical and engineering information
. College Park, MD: National Archives. Obtained from: http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nsdd/nsdd-189.htm
Obama, Barack. 2010. Fact Sheet on the President’s Export Control Reform Initiative. Washington, D.C.: The White House.
Office of the Inspector General. 2004. Office of the inspector general: Deemed export controls may not stop the transfer of sensitive technology to foreign nationals in the US
. US Department of Commerce. http://www.oig.doc.gov/oig/reports/2004/BIS-IPE-16176-03-2004.pdf
Panel on Scientific Communication, Engineering National Security Committee on Science, and Public Policy. 1982. Scientific communication and national security—the Corson report. Washington: National Academy Press.
Pielke Jr, Roger A. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Pinch, Trevor J., and Wiebe E. Bijker. 1984. The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science
14(3): 399–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1962. The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva
1: 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery
. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Price, Don Krasher. 1965. The scientific estate
. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, C.J., and R.G. Webster. 2005. The genesis of a pandemic influenza virus. Cell
123(3): 368–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapolsky, Harvey M. 1990. Science and the navy: The history of the Office of Naval Research. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Sarewitz, Daniel R. 1996. Frontiers of illusion: Science, technology, and the politics of progress
. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Schatch, Wendy H. 2005. CRS report, the Bayh-Dole Act: Selected issues in patent policy and the commercialization of technology. Congressional Research Service.
Schnirring, Lisa. 2012. H5N1 mutations, other details unveiled at H5N1 meeting
. University of Minnesota. CIDRAP News
Shils, Edward A. 1972. The intellectuals and the powers, and other essays. His selected papers, 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry L. Leslie. 1997. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university
. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Sheila, and Gary Rhoades. 2004. Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education
. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce L. R. 1990. American science policy since World War II. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Smith, Tobin L., Josh Trapani, Anthony Decrappeo, and David Kennedy. 2011. Reforming regulation of research universities. Issues in Science and Technology (September): 57–64.
Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 19(3).
Steelman, John Roy. 1947. Science and public policy
. Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Valdivia, Walter D. 2011. The stakes in Bayh-Dole: Public values beyond the pace of innovation. Minerva
49(1): 25–46. doi:10.1007/s11024-011-9162-6
World Health Organization. 2011a. Cumulative number of confirmed human cases for avian influenza A(H5N1) reported to WHO, 2003–2011
World Health Organization. 2011b. H5N1 Avian influenza: Timeline of major events (updated as of 7 November)
World Health Organization. 2012. Report on technical consultation on H5N1 research issues
. Geneva. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2011/pip_framework_20111229/en/index.html
Young Jr., John J. 2008. Under Secretary of Defense Memorandum for Secretaries of the Military Departments. http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=10846