, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 447–460 | Cite as

University Researchers Contributing to Technology Markets 1900–85. A Long-Term Analysis of Academic Patenting in Finland



Regardless of the increased interest in technological innovation in universities, relatively little is known about the technology developed by academic scientists. Long-term analyses of researchers’ technological contribution are notably missing. This paper examines university-based technology in Finland during the period 1900–85. The focus is on the quantity and technological specialization of applications created inside the universities and in the changes that occurred in scientists’ technological output over nine decades. In the long-term analysis several aspects in universities’ technological contribution, which are typically considered a recent phenomenon, turn out to have long historical roots. Thus the empirical evidence provided in the article challenges views emphasising that the world of science has faced a drastic change in recent decades.


Academic patenting Long-term analysis Commercialisation of university research University-industry linkage 


  1. Balconi, Margherita, Stefano Breschi, and Francesco Lissoni. 2004. Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy 33(1): 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Etzkowitz, Henry. 2003. Research groups as “quasi-firms”: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy 32(1): 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Etzkowitz, Henry. 1994. Knowledge as property: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the debate over academic patent policy. Minerva 32(4): 383–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Geuna, Aldo, and Lionel J.J. Nesta. 2006. University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy 35(6): 790–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Grupp, Hariolf, and Ulrich Schmoch. 1992. Perceptions of scientification of innovation as measured by referencing between patents and papers: dynamics in science-based fields of technology. In Dynamics of science-based innovation, ed. Hariolf Grupp. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Jones-Evans, Dylan. 1998. Universities, technology transfer and spin-off activities—academic entrepreneurship in different European regions. Targeted socio-economic research project no 1042. Final report. European Union.Google Scholar
  8. Kaataja, Sampsa. 2010. Technology alongside science. Finnish academic scientists as developers of commercial technology during the 20th century. Bidrag till kännedom av Finlands natur och folk. Helsinki. The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  9. Kutinlahti, Pirjo. 2006. Universities approaching markets. Intertwining scientific and entrepreneurial goals. Espoo/Helsinki. VTT technical research Centre of Finland and University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  10. Leydesdorff, Loet, and Henry Etzkowitz. 2001. The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology 5(4). http://www.sociology.org/content/vol005.004/th.html.
  11. Lissoni, Francesco, Patrick Llerena, Maureen McKelvey, and Bulat Sanditov. 2008. Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation 17(2): 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meyer, Martin. 2003. Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness. Research Evaluation 12(1): 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meyer, Martin, Tanja Siniläinen, Jan Timm Utecht, Olle Persson, Jianzhong Hong. 2003. Tracing knowledge flows in the Finnish innovation system. A study of US patents granted to Finnish university researchers. Technology review 144/2003. Helsinki: Tekes.Google Scholar
  14. Mowery, David, Richard Nelson, Bhaven Sampat, and Arvids Ziedonis. 2004. Ivory tower and industrial innovation. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mowery, David, and Bhaven Sampat. 2001. Patenting and licensing university inventions: Lessons from the history of the Research Corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change 10(2): 317–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nelson, Richard. 2001. Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1–2): 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. OECD. 2003. Turning science into business. Patenting and licensing at public research institutions. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  18. Saragossi, Sarina, and Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. 2003. What patent data reveal about universities: the case of Belgium. Journal of Technology Transfer 28(1), 47–51.Google Scholar
  19. Schmoch, Ulrich. 1999. Interaction of universities and industrial enterprises in Germany and the United States—a comparison. Industry and Innovation 6(1): 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wallmark, J. Torkel. 1997. Inventions and patents at universities: The case of Chalmers University of Technology. Technovation 17(3): 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringAalto UniversityAaltoFinland
  2. 2.School of Humanities and Social SciencesUniversity of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations