Minerva

, 49:241

The ASEAN-ISIS Network: Interpretive Communities, Informal Diplomacy and Discourses of Region

Article

Abstract

A network of think tanks—the ASEAN-Institutes of Strategic and International Studies and their researchers—have played a proactive and sometimes influential role in regional debates on Asian economic integration and security cooperation through informal diplomacy. This paper contributes to the literature on knowledge utilisation, specifically debates on the role of policy research institutes in policy-making. Paying attention to the debates and research on economic and security cooperation which preceded attempts at institutionalisation drives analytical attention to scholars, think tanks and others in the ‘interpretive community’ who were engaged in a long term learning activity to shape domestic and regional agendas and institutionalise discourses of regional cooperation.

Keywords

Think tank Networks Diplomacy ASEAN Interpretive community 

References

  1. Acharya, Acharya. 2004. How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization 58 (Spring): 239–75.Google Scholar
  2. Acharya, Acharya, and Ian Johnstone (eds.). 2007. Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, Desmond, Anthony Milner, and Brendan Taylor. 2006. Track 2 Security Dialogue in the Asia-Pacific: Reflections and Future Directions. Asian Security 2(3): 174–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butcher, Andrew. 2009. The Grand-Daddy of Track-Two Dialogues. The Interpreter. http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/post/2009/07/07/The-grand-daddy-of-track-two-dialogues.aspx. Accessed 9th March 2011.
  5. Caballero-Anthony, Mely. 2006. ASEAN-ISIS and the ASEAN Peoples’ Assembly: Paving a Multi-Track Approach in Regional Community Building. In Twenty Two Years of ASEAN ISIS eds. Hadi Soesastro, Clara Joewono, and Carolina Hernandez. 53–73. Jakarta: CSISGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, John. 2008. What do we know—or not—about Ideas and Politics? In Institutions and Politics eds. Peter Nedergaard and John Campbell, 157–76. Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Capie, David, and Brendan Taylor. 2010. The Shangri-La Dialogue and the institutionalization of defence diplomacy in Asia. The Pacific Review 23(3): 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chataway, Cynthia. 1998. Track II Diplomacy from a Track I Perspective. Negotiation Journal 14(3): 269–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins, Alan. 2008. A People-Oriented ASEAN: A Door Ajar or Closed for Civil Society Organizations? Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 30(2): 313–331.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, Andrew. 2007. Celebrity Diplomacy. Boulder, Co: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Evans, Paul. 2006. Do Individuals Matter? Track Two Leadership with Southeast Asian Characteristics In Twenty Two Years of ASEAN ISIS, eds. Hadi Soesastro, Clara Joewono, and Carolina Hernandez, 97–104. Jakarta: CSIS.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, Ronald. 2006. Coordination Between Track Two and Track One Diplomacy in Successful Cases of Prenegotiation. International Negotiation 11(1): 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guilhot, Nicholas. 2006. A Network of Influential Friendships: The Fondation Pour Une Entraide Intellectuelle Européenne and East-West Cultural Dialogue, 1957–1991. Minerva 44: 379–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 1994. Singapore: The Politics of Regional Definition. The Pacific Review 7(4): 411–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Job, Brian. 2003. Track 2 Diplomacy: Ideational Contribution to the Evolving Asian Security Order. In Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features, ed. Muttiah Alagappa, 241–79. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Johnstone, Ian. 2005. The power of interpretative communities, In Power in Global Governance eds. Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall, 185–204 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jones, Peter. 2008. Canada and Track Two Diplomacy Canadian International Council. www.canadianinternationalcouncil.org. Accessed 7 March 2011.
  19. Kaye, Dalia Dassa. 2007. Talking to the enemy: Track two diplomacy in the Middle East and South Asia. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  20. Kjaer, Peter, and Ove Pedersen. 2001. Translating Liberalization. In The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis, eds. John Campbell, and Ove Pedersen, 219–48. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kerr, Pauline. 1994. The security dialogue in the Asia-Pacific. The Pacific Review 7(4): 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, Beng Phar. 2001. Asia’s Informal Diplomacy: Track 2 discussion and Regionalism. Harvard International Review 23(1): 38–41.Google Scholar
  23. Kraft, Herman. 2002. Track three diplomacy and human rights in Southeast Asia: the Asia Pacific coalition for East Timor. Global Networks 2(1): 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, Chyungly. 2009. Cross-Strait Participation in the Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia Pacific: A Case Study of a Multilateral Track Two Approach to Conflict Prevention. Issues & Studies 45(4): 189–215.Google Scholar
  25. Milner, Anthony. 2007. Reconciling Asean + 3 and East Asia Summit. In Peace in the Pacific: Confronting the Issues, ed. Stephen Leong, Kuala Lumpur: ISIS Malaysia.Google Scholar
  26. Morrison, Charles. 2004. Track 1/Track 2 symbiosis in Asia-Pacific regionalism. The Pacific Review 17(4): 547–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manea, Maria-Gabriela. 2009. How and Why Interaction Matters: ASEAN’s Regional Identity and Human Rights. Cooperation and Conflict 44(1): 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nan, Susan Allen, Daniel Druckman, and Jana El Hor. 2009. Unofficial International Conflict Resolution: Is There a Track 1 1/2? Are There Best Practices? Conflict Resolution Quarterly 27(1): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nesadurai, Helen. 2011. The ASEAN People’s Forum as Authentic Social Forum. In Handbook of Asian Regionalism, eds. Mark Beeson and Richard Stubbs, Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Nesadurai, Helen, and Diane Stone. 2000. Southeast Asian Think Tanks in Global and Regional Networking Panorama Friedrich Ebert Stiftung occasional papers: 19–35.Google Scholar
  31. Parmar, Inderjeet. 2002. ‘To Relate Knowledge and Action’: The Impact of the Rockefeller Foundation on Foreign Policy Thinking during America’s Rise to Globalism 1939–1945. Minerva 40(3): 235–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rouhana, Nadim. 1995. Unofficial Third-Party Intervention in International Conflict: Between Legitimacy and Disarray. Negotiation Journal 11(3): 255–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rüland, Jürgen. 2002. The Contribution of Track Two Dialogue towards Crisis Prevention. Asien, 85 (Oktober): 84–96.Google Scholar
  34. Sandhu, Kernial. 1991. Strategic Studies in the Region, 25th Anniversary Conference on Strategic Studies in A Changing World, 29 July–1 Aug, Canberra.Google Scholar
  35. Schmidt, Vivien. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11 (June): 303–326.Google Scholar
  36. Soesastro, Hadi, Clara Joewono, and Carolina Hernandez. 2006. Introduction. In Twenty Two Years of ASEAN ISIS eds. Hadi Soesastro, Clara Joewono, and Carolina Hernandez, 1–15. Jakarta: CSIS.Google Scholar
  37. Sukma, Rizal. 2006. ASEAN ISIS and Political Security Cooperation in Asia Pacific. In Twenty Two Years of ASEAN ISIS eds. Hadi Soesastro, Clara Joewono, and Carolina Hernandez, 89–96. Jakarta: CSIS.Google Scholar
  38. Tay, Simon. 2006. Challenges and Prospects for ASEAN ISIS. In Twenty Two Years of ASEAN ISIS eds. Hadi Soesastro, Clara Joewono, and Carolina Hernandez, 125–39. Jakarta: CSIS.Google Scholar
  39. Wendt, Alexander. 1994. Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review 88(2): 384–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yamamoto, Tadashi, and Susan Hubbard. 1995. Conference Report. In Emerging Civil Society in the Asia Pacific Community, ed. Tadashi Yamamoto, 40–52. Singapore, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies and Japan Centre for International Exchange.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Politics and International RelationsUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Politics and International StudiesUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations