, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 309–330 | Cite as

Mission Completed? Changing Visibility of Women’s Colleges in England and Japan and Their Roles in Promoting Gender Equality in Science



The global community, from UNESCO to NGOs, is committed to promoting the status of women in science, engineering and technology, despite long-held prejudices and the lack of role models. Previously, when equality was not firmly established as a key issue on international or national agendas, women’s colleges played a great role in mentoring female scientists. However, now that a concerted effort has been made by governments, the academic community and the private sector to give women equal opportunities, the raison d’être of women’s universities seems to have become lost. This paper argues otherwise, by demonstrating that women’s universities in Japan became beneficiaries of government initiatives since the early 2000s to reverse the low ratio of women in scientific research. The paper underscores the importance of the reputation of women’s universities embedded in their institutional foundations, by explaining how female scientific communities take shape in different national contexts. England, as a primary example of a neoliberal welfare regime, with its strong emphasis on equality and diversity, promoted its gender equality policy under the auspices of the Department of Trade and Industry. By contrast, with a strong emphasis on family values and the male-breadwinner model, the Japanese government carefully treated the goal of supporting female scientists from the perspective of the equal participation of both men and women rather than that of equality. Following this trend, rather contradictorily, women’s universities, with their tradition of fostering a ‘good wife, wise mother’ image, began to be highlighted as potential gender-free institutions that provided role models and mentoring female scientists. By drawing on the cases of England and Japan, this paper demonstrates how the idea of equality can be framed differently, according to wider institutional contexts, and how this idea impacts on gender policies.


Gender equality policy Science education Women’s colleges Ideas and institutions Comparative study 


  1. Arnot, Madeleine, Miriam David, and Gaby Weiner. 1999. Closing the gender gap: Postwar education and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Asahi Shimbun. July 29, 2000; November 15, 2005; September 16, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. Boling, Patricia. 2007. Policies to support working mothers and children. In The political economy of Japan’s low fertility, ed. Frances M. Rosenbluth, 131–154. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buckley, Sandra. 1997. Ueno Chizuko. In Broken silences: Voices of Japanese feminism, ed. Sandra Buckley, 272–301. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burke, Mary P. 2004. UN women’s conference collection, 1975–1995: A finding aid. Boston: Suffolk University.Google Scholar
  6. Butcher, Jane. 2006. Supply and demand-side actions to promote women in S&T: Lessons from the United Kingdom Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology. In Women in Scientific Careers: Unleashing the Potential, 203–208. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  7. Cabinet Office of Japan. 2002. International comparison of public perceptions on equal participation of men and women in society (Danjyo Kyōdosankaku ni kansusu Kokusai Hikaku Chōsa). Tokyo: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  8. Cabinet Office of Japan. 2006. The third science and technology basic plan (Dai san-ki Kagaku Gijyutsu Kihon Keikaku). Tokyo: Cabinet Office. http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/basic/index.html. Accessed 10 June 2008.
  9. Cabinet Office of UK. 1993. Realising our potential: A strategy for science, engineering and technology. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  10. Cabinet Office of UK. 1994. Rising tide: A report on women in science, engineering and technology. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  11. Ceci, Stephen J., and Wendy M. Williams. 2007. Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Department of Education and Science. 1975. Curricular differences for boys and girls: Education survey 21. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  13. Department of Education and Science. 1978. Girls and science (matters for discussion 13). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Trade and Industry. 1997. Breaking the mould: An assessment of successful strategies for attracting girls into science, engineering and technology. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  15. Department of Trade and Industry. 2003. A strategy for women in science, engineering and technology: Government response to SET fair, a report from Baroness Susan Greenfield to the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  16. Estévez-Abe, Margarita, Torben Iverson, and David Soskice. 2001. Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage, eds. Peter Hall, and David Soskice, 145–183. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Etzkowitz, Henry, and Carol Kemelgor. 2001. Gender inequality in science: A universal condition? Minerva 39(2): 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. European Commission. 2000. Science policies in the European Union: Promoting excellence through mainstreaming gender equality. Luxembourg, OPOCE: A report from the ETAN Expert Working group on Women and Science.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. 2001. Women and science: The gender dimension as a leverage for reforming science, working paper, SEC (2001) 771. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. 2006. She figures 2006: Women and science statistics and indicator. Brussels: Directorate General for Research, European Commission.Google Scholar
  21. Francis, Becky. 2000. The gendered subject: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject ability. Oxford Review of Education 26(1): 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenfield, Susan et al. 2002. SET fair: A report on women in science, engineering and technology. London: Department of Technology and Industry. http://www.dti.gov.uk/science/science-and-society/science-workforce/women-in-set/page10491.html. Accessed 10 June 2008.
  23. Ichibangase, Yasuko, and Emiko Okuyama. 1975. Women’s liberation and education (Fujin kaihō to jyoshi kyōiku). Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.Google Scholar
  24. Iversen, Torben, Francis Rosenbluth, and David Soskice. 2005. Divorce and the gender division of labor in comparative perspective. Social Politics 12(2): 216–242.Google Scholar
  25. Jütting, Johannes, and Christian Morrisson. 2006. L’égalité entre les sexes est un outil du développement, Le Monde. 13 Jan 2006.Google Scholar
  26. Kamiko, Tatsuko. 1991. Current situation in junior high school text books. In Gender discrimination in text books (Kyōkasho no naka no danjyo sabetsu), eds. Yoshinori Ito, Masako Owaki, Tatsuko Kamiko, and Mutsuko Yoshioka, 175–184. Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.Google Scholar
  27. Klasen, Stephan. 2002. Low schooling for girls, slower growth for all? Cross-country evidence on the effect of gender inequality in education on economic development. The World Bank Economic Review 16(3): 345–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumlin, Staffan. 2004. The personal and the political: How personal welfare state experiences affect political trust and ideology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Kuwahara, Motoko. 2001. Japanese women in science and technology. Minerva 39(2): 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mainichi Shimbun. 2 December 2002.Google Scholar
  31. McCall, Leslie, and Ann Orloff. 2005. Introduction to special issue of social politics: Gender, class and capitalism. Social Politics 12(2): 159–169.Google Scholar
  32. Miller-Bernal, Leslie. 2006. Cambridge University’s two oldest women’s colleges, Girton and Newnham. In Challenged by coeducation: Women’s colleges since the 1960, eds. Leslie Miller-Bernal, and Susan L. Poulson. USA: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, Technology of Japan. 2005. International comparison of education standard (Kyōiku shihyō no kokusai hikaku). Tokyo: MEXT.Google Scholar
  34. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology of Japan. 2006. White paper on science and technology, challenge for building a future societythe role of science and technology in an aging society with fewer childrenhttp://www.mext.go.jp/english/news/2007/03/07022214.htm. Accessed 10 June 2008.
  35. O’Conner, Julia, Ann Orloff, and Sheila Shaver. 1999. States, markets, families: Gender, liberalism and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain, and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peng, Ito. 2002. Gender and generation: Japanese child care and the demographic crisis. In Child care policy at the crossroads: Gender and welfare state restructuring, eds. Sonya Michel, and Rianne Mahon, 31–56. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Perrons, Diane, Colette Fagan, Linda McDowell, Kath Ray, and Kevin Ward. 2005. Work, life and time in the new economy. An introduction. Time and Society 14(1): 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phipps, Alison. 2008. Women in science, engineering and technology: Three decades of UK initiatives. Stoke on Trent, UK and Sterling. USA: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  39. Price, Jean, and Barry Talbot. 1984. Girls and physical science at Ellis Guilford School. School Science Review 66(234): 7–11.Google Scholar
  40. Robbins, Donald. 1999. Gender, human capital and growth: Evidence from Six Latin American countries, OECD Development Centre (Working Paper No. 151). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  41. Seguino, Stephanie, and Caren Grown. 2006. Gender equity and globalization. Journal of International Development 18(8): 1081–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sekiguchi, Sumiko. 2010. Confucian morals and the making of a ‘good wife and wise mother’: From ‘between husband and wife there is a distinction’ to ‘as husbands and wives be harmonious’. Social Science Japan Journal 13(1): 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sievers, Sharon. 1983. Flowers in salt: The beginnings of a feminist consciousness in modern Japan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. The Guardian. May 13 1997; September 5 2002.Google Scholar
  45. The Independent. August 11 1999; March 14 2003.Google Scholar
  46. The Weekly Economist. 2007. “League table of universities: the top 150 based on their graduates’ performance of entering successful large corporations” (Daigaku shūshoku-ritsu ranking). Tokyo: Mainichi Shimbun Publishing (14/21 August).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naonori Kodate
    • 1
    • 4
  • Kashiko Kodate
    • 2
  • Takako Kodate
    • 3
  1. 1.NIHR King’s Patient Safety and Service Quality Research CentreKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Japan Science and Technology AgencyTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Information and SciencesTokyo Woman’s Christian UniversityTokyoJapan
  4. 4.NIHR King’s Patient Safety and Service Quality Research CentreLondonUK

Personalised recommendations