Minerva

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 169–187 | Cite as

Pooling Resources for Excellence and Relevance: An Evolution of Universities as Multi-Scalar Network Organisations

Article

Abstract

There are a number of different forms of inter-organisational collaborative arrangements between universities at international, national and sub-national levels. This paper focuses on a particular form of inter-university collaboration mechanisms, which represents one of the key recent policy developments in Scotland. Research pooling initiatives are a regional response to create international research excellence and regional relevance by ‘pooling’ specific areas of research excellences that are seen to be of strategic importance to Scotland universities across the region. Research pooling initiatives as networks can be seen as strategic processes. Universities share resources and research facilities among selective partners and recruit professors and research students internationally by branding their subject areas together. This multi-scalar institutional development is set against the background of devolution and globalisation of science, technology and innovation policy on the one hand, and changing national higher education policies in the UK on the other.

Keywords

Networks Strategy Research excellence Public policy Universities The UK Scotland Multilevel governance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is partly supported by the ESRC-funded LLAKES Research Centre—grant reference RES-594-28-0001.

References

  1. Altbach, Philip, and Jorge Balán. 2007. World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beerkens, Eric. 2002. International inter-organisational arrangements in higher education: Towards a typology. Tertiary Education and Management 8(4): 297–314.Google Scholar
  3. Benner, Matt, and Ulf Sandström. 2000. Institutionalizing the triple helix: Research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy 29: 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benneworth, Paul, and Gert-Jan Hospers. 2007. Urban competitiveness in the knowledge economy: Universities as new planning animateurs. Progress in Planning 67: 105–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brenner, Neil. 2009. Open questions on state re scaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2(1): 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, Philip, Hugh Lauder, and David Ashton. 2008. Education, globalisation and the future of the knowledge economy. European Educational Research Journal 7(2): 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butera, F. 2000. Adapting the pattern of university organisation to the needs of the knowledge economy. European Journal of Education 35(4): 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chatterton, Paul, and John Goddard. 2000. The response of higher education institutions to regional need. European Journal of Education 35(4): 475–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesbrough, Henry. 2003. Open innovation. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Cooke, Philip. 2007. Regional innovation, entrepreneurship and talent system. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 7(2–5): 117–139.Google Scholar
  11. Cooke, Philip, Mikel G. Uranga, and Goio Etxebarria. 1998. Regional systems of innovation: An evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning 30(9): 1563–1584.Google Scholar
  12. Crespy, Cecile, Jean-Alain Heraud, and Beth Perry. 2007. Multi-level governance, regions and science in France: Between competition and equality. Regional Studies 41(8): 1069–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. 2010. Cambridge-MIT Institute. http://www.dius.gov.uk/science/knowledge_transfer/uk_us_collaboration/cambridge_mit. Accessed 20 Apr 2010.
  14. DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29: 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, Donald, Janet Atkinson-Grosjean, and Dawn House. 2001. Changes in academy/industry/state relations in Canada: The creation and development of the networks of centres of excellence. Minerva 39: 299–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gani, D., and Fancey, S. 2009. Scottish research makes a splash in the pool 23 Janaury 2009. http://www.publicservantscotland.co.uk/feature_story.asp?id=11173. Accessed 16 Mar 2009.
  18. Geuna, Aldo, and Alessandro Muscio. 2009. The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of literature. Minerva 47: 93–114.Google Scholar
  19. Goddard, John, and Paul Chatterton. 1999. Regional development agencies and the knowledge economy: Harnessing the potential of universities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 17(6): 685–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gunasekara, Chrys. 2006. Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems. Journal of Technology Transfer 31(1): 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hay, Collin. 1998. The tangled webs we weave: The discourse, strategy and practice of networking. In Comparing policy networks, ed. D. Marsh, 33–51. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Horta, Hugo. 2010. The role of the state in the Internationalization of universities in catching-up countries: An analysis of the Portuguese higher education system. Higher Education Policy 23: 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Human Communication Research Centre (HCRC). 2010. The Edinburgh-Stanford link. http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/stanford/. Accessed 20 Feb 2010.
  24. Jessop, Bob. 2001. Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach. Environment and Planning A 33: 1213–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jessop, Bob. 2005. Cultural political economy, the knowledge-based economy and the state. In The technological economy, eds. Andrew Barry, and Don Slater, 142–164. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Jessop, Bob. 2007. State power, a strategic-relational approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jessop, Bob, Brenner, Neil, and Jones, Martin. 2009. Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26(3):389–401 (Brenner, Neil. 2009. Open questions on state re-scaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2(1):123–139.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, Martin, Mark Goodwin, and Rhys Jones. 2005. State modernization, devolution and economic governance: An introduction and guide to debate. Regional Studies 39: 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaiser, Robert, and Heiko Prange. 2004. The reconfiguration of national innovation systems—The example of German biotechnology. Research Policy 33: 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kitagawa, Fumi. 2009. Creating critical mass of research excellence in the region: The case of Scottish research pooling initiatives. European Planning Studies 17: 487–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lawton Smith, Helen. 2007. Universities, innovation and territorial development: A review of the evidence. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25: 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke. 1992. Introduction. In National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, ed. B. Lundvall. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  33. Lyall, Catherine. 2005. Scotland’s science strategy: An exercise in concurrent power? Scottish Affairs 52: 51–70.Google Scholar
  34. Lyall, Catherine. 2007. Changing boundaries: The role of policy networks in the multi-level governance of science and innovation. Science and Public Policy 34(1): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Massey, Doreen. 1993. Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change, eds. J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putman, G. Robertson, and L. Ticker, 59–69. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Ohmae, Kenichi. 1995. The end of the nation state: The rise of regional economies. New York: Free Press Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  37. Oleksiyenko, Anatoly, and Creso Sa. 2009. Resource asymmetries and cumulative advantages: Canadian and US research universities and the field of global health. Higher Education 59(3): 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2007. Higher education and regions, globally competitive. Locally engaged. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  39. Pavitt, Keith. 1998. The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy 27(8): 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perkmann, Markus, and Kate Walsh. 2007. University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 9(4): 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perry, Beth. 2007. The multi-level governance of science policy in England. Regional Studies 41: 1051–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perry, Beth, and Tim May. 2010. Urban knowledge exchange: Devilish dichotomies and active intermediation. International Journal of Knowledge Based Development 1(1/2): 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Philo, Chris, and Hester Parr. 2000. Editorial: Institutional geographies. Introductory remarks. Geoforum 31: 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Power, Dominique, and Anders Malmberg. 2008. The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: In what sense a regional problem? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1: 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sainsbury, David. 2007. The race to the top: A review of government’s science and innovation policies. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  46. Scott, Kirsty. 2008. Scots universities pool research to join world leaders in Guardian 18 December 2008. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/dec/18/rae-scotland. Accessed 16 Mar 2009.
  47. ScotCHEM. 2010. Website 31 industry PhD studentships in chemistry. http://www.scotchem.ac.uk/SPIRIT. Accessed 1 Mar 2010.
  48. Scottish Executive. 2001. A science strategy for Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  49. Scottish Funding Council (SFC). 2004. (HE/14/04) Strengths of the Scottish higher education research base. http://archive.sfc.ac.uk/information/info_circulars/shefc/2004/he1404/he1404.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2009.
  50. SFC. 2007. Scottish research pooling in medical imaging SFC/07/55 March 2007. http://www.sfc.ac.uk/web/FILES/CouncilpapersCouncilmeeting16March2007/paper_sfc0755.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2009.
  51. Slaughter, Sheila, and Gary Rhoades. 2004. Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  52. Srinivas, Smita, and Kimmo Viljamaa. 2008. Emergence of economic institutions: Analysing the third role of universities in Turku, Finland. Regional Studies 42(3): 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Storper, Michale. 1997. The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Strathclyde University (2009) Phenomenal success of WestCHEM in research assessment exercise. http://www.chem.strath.ac.uk/research/rae. Accessed 1 Mar 2010.
  55. SULSA. 2009. SULSA website vision. http://www.sulsa.ac.uk/vision.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2009.
  56. SULSA. 2010. SULSA website knowledge exchange. http://www.sulsa.ac.uk/KE. Accessed 1 Mar 2010.
  57. SUPA. 2007a. Millions at stage in knowledge transfer. SUPA News. 12 June 2007.Google Scholar
  58. SUPA. 2007b. Top marks for Graduate School. SUPA News. 12 June 2007.Google Scholar
  59. SUPA. 2008a. SUPA RAE press release 18 December 2008. http://www.supa.ac.uk/news/resources/SUPA_RAE_press_release.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2010.
  60. SUPA. 2008b. SUPA KT showcase. SUPA News. 27 Feb 2008. http://www.supa.ac.uk/news/SUPA_newsletter/SUPA_Newsletter_7_1.pdf.
  61. SUPA. 2009. KT News, SUPA News. 12 December 2009.Google Scholar
  62. SUPA. 2010. SUPA website homepage. http://www.supa.ac.uk/. Accessed 12 Apr 2010.
  63. Swyndegouw, Eric. 1992. The mammon quest: “Globalisation”, interspatial competition and the monetary order—The construction of new scales. In Cities and regions in the New Europe, eds. M. Dunford, and G. Kafkalas. New York: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
  64. Talentscotland. 2010. Mike Tyers, SULSA 10 March 2010. http://www.talentscotland.com/view_item.aspx?item_id=78110&list_id=list1-412&list_index=1. Accessed 12 April 2010.
  65. Teather, David (ed.). 2004. Consortia: International networking alliances of universities. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Teichler, Ulrich. 1988. Changing patterns of the higher education system. The experience of three decades. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  67. Teichler, Ulrich (2004) Changing structures of the higher education systems: The increasing complexity of underlying forces. In UNESCO Forum Occasional Paper Series Paper No. 6. Diversification of Higher Education and the Changing Role of Knowledge and Research.Google Scholar
  68. Underwood, Daniel. 1998. The institutional origins of crises of economy and ecology. Journal of Economic Issues 32(2): 513–522.Google Scholar
  69. Universities Scotland. 2009. Briefing: Research. http://www.universities-scotland.ac.uk/uploads/briefings/research.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2009.
  70. Universities UK. 2008. Devolution and higher education: Impact and future trends. London: Universities UK.Google Scholar
  71. Wangenge-Ouma, Gerald, and Petricio Langa. 2010. Universities and the mobilization of claims of excellence for competitive advantage. Higher Education 59: 749–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wegner, Etienne. 1998. Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Wellings, Paul. 2008. Intellectual property and research benefits. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  74. Westnes, Petter, Sachi Hatakenaka, Martin Gjelsvik, and Richard Lester. 2009. The role of universities in strengthening local capabilities for innovation—A comparative case study. Higher Education Policy 22: 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Youtie, Jan, and Phil Shapira. 2008. Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy 37: 1188–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations