Minerva

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 73–99 | Cite as

Patterns of Subject Mix in Higher Education Institutions: A First Empirical Analysis Using the AQUAMETH Database

Article

Abstract

Teaching and research are organised differently between subject domains: attempts to construct typologies of higher education institutions, however, often do not include quantitative indicators concerning subject mix which would allow systematic comparisons of large numbers of higher education institutions among different countries, as the availability of data for such indicators is limited. In this paper, we present an exploratory approach for the construction of such indicators. The database constructed in the AQUAMETH project, which includes also data disaggregated at the disciplinary level, is explored with the aim of understanding patterns of subject mix. For six European countries, an exploratory and descriptive analysis of staff composition divided in four large domains (medical sciences, engineering and technology, natural sciences and social sciences and humanities) is performed, which leads to a classification distinguishing between specialist and generalist institutions. Among the latter, a further distinction is made based on the presence or absence of a medical department. Preliminary exploration of this classification and its comparison with other indicators show the influence of long term dynamics on the subject mix of individual higher education institutions, but also underline disciplinary differences, for example regarding student to staff ratios, as well as national patterns, for example regarding the number of PhD degrees per 100 undergraduate students. Despite its many limitations, this exploratory approach allows defining a classification of higher education institutions that accounts for a large share of differences between the analysed higher education institutions.

Keywords

Subject mix Classification of higher education institutions Generalist vs. specialist Indicators Staff composition 

References

  1. Balassa, Bela. 1965. Trade liberalization and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 33: 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becher, Tony, and Paul R. Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Ballmoor: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bleiklie, Ivar. 2003. Hierarchy and specialisation: On the institutional integration of higher education systems. European Journal of Education 38(4): 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonaccorsi, Andrea, and Cinzia Daraio. 2007a. Theoretical perspectives on university strategy. In Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe, eds. Andrea Bonaccorsi, and Cinzia Daraio, 3–30. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Bonaccorsi, Andrea, and Cinzia Daraio. 2007b. Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Bonaccorsi, Andrea, and Cinzia Daraio. 2007c. Universities as strategic knowledge creators: Some preliminary evidence. In Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe, eds. Andrea Bonaccorsi, and Cinzia Daraio, 31–81. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Bonaccorsi, Andrea, Cinzia Daraio, Benedetto Lepori, and Stig Slipersaeter. 2007. Indicators on individual higher education institutions: Addressing data problems and comparability issues. Research Evaluation 16: 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, Burton R. 1983. The higher education system. Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, Burton R. 1995. Places of inquiry: Research and advanced education in modern universities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Filippini, Massimo, and Benedetto Lepori. 2007. Cost structure, economies of capacity utilization and scope in Swiss higher education institutions. In Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe, eds. Andrea Bonaccorsi, and Cinzia Daraio, 272–305. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Fumasoli, Tatiana and Benedetto Lepori. 2010. Patterns of strategies in Swiss higher education institutions. Submitted paper.Google Scholar
  12. Huisman, Jeroen, V. Lynn Meek, and Fiona Wood. 2007. Institutional diversity in higher education: A cross-national and longitudinal analysis. Higher Education Quarterly 61(4): 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnes, Jill. 1990. Unit costs: Some explanations of the differences between UK universities. Applied Economics 22(7): 853–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jongbloed, Ben, Carlo Salerno, and Frans Kaiser. 2003. Kosten per student. Methodologie, schattingen en een internationale vergelijking. Enschede: CHEPs Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Kyvik, Svein. 2004. Structural changes in higher education systems in Western Europe. Higher Education in Europe 29(3): 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meek, V. Lynn, Leo Goedegebuure, Osmo Kivinen, and Risto Rinne. 1996. The mockers and mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  17. Meek, V. Lynn, Leo Goedegebuure, and Jeroen Huisman. 2000. Editorial: Understanding diversity and differentiation in higher education: an overview. Higher Education Policy 13: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morphew, Christopher C. 2000. Institutional diversity, program acquisition and faculty members: Examining academic drift at a new level. Higher Education Policy 13: 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Musselin, Christine. 2007. Are Universities specific organisations? In Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions, eds. Georg Krücken, Anna Kosmützky, and Marc Torka, 63–84. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  20. Nederhof, Anton J. 2006. Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics 66(1): 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD. 2002. Frascati manual. Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  22. OECD. 2004. OECD handbook for internationally comparative education statistics. Concepts, standards, definitions and classifications. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  23. Rossi, Federica. 2009. Increased competition and diversity in higher education: An empirical analysis of the Italian University system. Higher Education Policy 22: 389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rothblatt, Sheldon, and Björn Wittrock. 1993. The European and American University since 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rüegg, Walter. 2004. A history of the University in Europe, Vol. III: Universities in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Salancik, Gerald R., and Jeffrey Pfeffer. 1974. The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a University. The entity from which ERIC acquires the content, including journal, organization, and conference names, or by means of online submission from the author. Administrative Science Quarterly 19(4): 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sarrico, Claudia S., Pedro Teixeira, Maria João Rosa, and Margarida F. Cardoso. 2009. Subject mix and productivity in Portuguese Universities. European Journal of Operational Research 197(1): 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van Vught, Frans. 2007. Diversity and differentiation in higher education systems. Oslo: The Norvegian Association of Higher Education Institutions, Jubileumsseminar i anledning Universitets- og høgskolerådets 50-årsjubileum.Google Scholar
  29. van Vught, Frans, Jeroen Bartelse, David Bohmert, Jon File, and Christiane Gaethgens. 2008. Mapping diversity. Developing a European classification of higher education institutions. Enschede: CHEPS Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benedetto Lepori
    • 1
  • Lukas Baschung
    • 2
  • Carole Probst
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Organisational Research, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of LuganoLuganoSwitzerland
  2. 2.Observatoire Science, Politique et SociétéUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations