The Typology of the Game that American, British, and Danish Crop and Plant Scientists Play
- First Online:
- 71 Downloads
Drawing from contemporary social science studies on the shifting regime of research governance, this paper extends the literature by utilizing a metaphoric image—research is a game—observed in a field engagement with 82 American, British, and Danish crop and plant scientists. It theorizes respondents’ thinking and practices by placing the rules of the research “game” in dynamic and interactive tension between the scientific, social, and political-economic contingencies that generate opportunities or setbacks. Scientists who play the game exploit opportunities and surmount setbacks by adopting strategies and reinventing tactics in order to maximize their winnings and to minimize their losses. Winners become superstars who decree what is open, closed, or doable science for the majority of the scientific community.
KeywordsTypology of the game of research Game metaphor Metaphorical theorization Public university researchers Online and popular games
- Bloor, David. 1997. Wittgenstein, rules and institutions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Crust, Lee. 2009. Sports psychology: Mental toughness. http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/sports-psychology-mental-toughness-14. Accessed 06 November 2009.
- Crust, Lee, and Ian Lawrence. 2006. A review of leadership in sports: Implications for football management. Athletic Insight 8 (4): 28–48.Google Scholar
- Cumming, Dennis. 2009. Examining the future of sports journalism. July 02, 2009 07:00 am. http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/sports/2009/july/Examining-the-Future-of-Sports-Journalism.html. Accessed 06 November 2009.
- Dweck, Carol. 2006. Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
- Gozzi, Raymond. 1999. The power of metaphor in the age of electronic media. Cresskill: Hampton.Google Scholar
- Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1995. Refiguring life: Metaphors of the twentieth-century biology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Koch, Susan, and Stanley Deetz. 1981. Metaphor analysis of social reality in organizations. Journal of Applied Communication Research 9 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
- Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Maasen, Sabine, and Peter Weingart. 2000. Metaphors and the dynamics of knowledge. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Merton, Robert. 1973 . The normative structure of science. In: The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, ed. Robert Merton, 254–278. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Nicholson, Yvonne Grinam. 2009. The publicist who keeps Usain Bolt on track. Jamaica Observer. Business section. Wednesday, October 21, 2009. http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/magazines/Business/html/20091020T2000000500_162214_OBS_THE_PUBLICIST_WHO_KEEPS_USAIN_BOLT_ON_TRACK.asp. Accessed 06 November 2009.
- Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in the age of uncertainty. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
- Shapin, Steven. 2008. The scientific life: A moral history of a late modern vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Shinn, Terry. 2002. The triple helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science 32: 599–614.Google Scholar
- Zagal, Jose P., Rick Jochen, and Idris Hsi. 2006. Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games. Simulation & Gaming 37 (24): 34–40.Google Scholar