The Rise and Fall of the Science Advisor to the President of the United States
- First Online:
- 143 Downloads
The president’s science advisor was formerly established in the days following the Soviet launch of Sputnik at the height of the Cold War, creating an impression of scientists at the center of presidential power. However, since that time the role of the science advisor has been far more prosaic, with a role that might be more aptly described as a coordinator of budgets and programs, and thus more closely related to the functions of the Office of Management and Budget than the development of presidential policy. This role dramatically enhances the position of the scientific community to argue for its share of federal expenditures. At the same time, scientific and technological expertise permeates every function of government policy and politics, and the science advisor is only rarely involved in wider White House decision making. The actual role of the science advisor as compared to its heady initial days, in the context of an overall rise of governmental expertise, provides ample reason to reconsider the role of the presidential science advisor, and to set our expectations for that role accordingly.
KeywordsScience advice Presidential science advisor Science and government Science and decision making
- Anonymous. 1945. Middlebury gives Killian honorary doctor’s degree. The Tech 65: 4, June 1. http://www-tech.mit.edu/archives/VOL_065/TECH_V065_S0085_P004.pdf.
- Anonymous. 1957. Degree for Killian. The Tech 77: 1, April 26.Google Scholar
- Blanpied, William A. 1995. Introduction to impacts of the early Cold War on the formulation of U.S. science policy. Washington, DC: AAAS. http://www.aaas.org/spp/cstc/pne/pubs/golden/golden.pdf.
- Broad, William. 2001. Government reviving ties to scientists. The New York Times, November 20.Google Scholar
- Bromley, David. 1994. The president’s scientists: Reminiscences of a White House science advisor. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Doel, Ronald, and Kristine Harper. 2006. Prometheus unleashed: Science as a diplomatic weapon in the Lyndon B. Johnson administration. Global Power Knowledge: Science and Technology in International Affairs 21: 66–85.Google Scholar
- Eisenhower, Dwight. 1957. Text of address by the President delivered from the oval office in the White House on “science in national security”. November 7: 6. http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/dl/Sputnik/PresidentialAddressNov71957pg6.pdf.
- Finney, John. 1957. Killian takes the oath as U.S. scientific coordinator. The New York Times, November 16: 1.Google Scholar
- GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2004. Federal advisory committees: Additional guidance could help agencies better ensure independence and balance. GAO-04-328.Google Scholar
- Glanz, James. 2001. The nation: Blue sky; sure, it’s rocket science, but who needs scientists? The New York Times, June 17.Google Scholar
- Glanz, James. 2004a. At the center of the storm over Bush and science. The New York Times, March 30.Google Scholar
- Glanz, James. 2004b. Scientists say administration distorts facts. The New York Times, February 19.Google Scholar
- Golden, William. 1950a. Conversation with Dr. Lee A. DuBridge, president of California Tech, Dr. James R. Killian, Jr., president of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Irvin Stewart, president of the University of West Virginia. October 25. http://archives.aaas.org/golden/pdf/049_19501025.pdf.
- Golden, William T. 1950b. Mobilizing science for war: The science advisor to the president, memorandum for the president. December 18. http://archives.aaas.org/golden/pdf/393_19501218.pdf.
- Greenberg, Daniel. 2001. Science, money, and politics: Political triumph and ethical erosion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Greene, Benjamin. 2007. Eisenhower, science advice, and the nuclear test-ban debate, 1945–1963. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Grossberg, Israel. 1974. The special assistant to the president for science and technology, 1957–1968. Doctoral dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
- Guston, David. 2009. Science, politics, and two unicorns: An academic critique of science advice. In Presidential science advisors: Perspectives and reflections on science, policy and politics, eds. Pielke Jr., Roger, and Roberta, Klein (in press).Google Scholar
- Hart, David. 1998. Forged consensus: Science, technology, and economic policy in the United States, 1921–1953. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Killian, James. 1982. Sputnik, scientists, and Eisenhower: A memoir of the first special assistant to the president for science and technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kleinman, Daniel Lee. 1995. Politics on the endless frontier: Postwar research policy in the United States. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Krige, John, and K. Kai-Henrik Barth. 2006. Introduction: Science, technology, and international affairs. In Global power knowledge. Science and technology in international affairs. Osiris, Second Series, vol. 21. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Lawton, Fred. 1950. Letter to William T. Golden. September 19. http://archives.aaas.org/golden/pdf/405_19500919.pdf.
- Marburger, John. 2004. Statement of the honorable John H. Marburger, III on scientific integrity in the Bush administration April 2, 2004. http://www.ostp.gov/html/ucs/ResponsetoCongressonUCSDocumentApril2004.pdf.
- Miller, Clark. 2006. An effective instrument of peace: Scientific cooperation as an instrument of U.S. foreign policy, 1938–1950. Global power knowledge. Science and technology in international affairs. Osiris, Second Series 21: 133–160.Google Scholar
- Mooney, Chris. 2005. The republican war on science. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Pielke Jr., Roger. (ed.). 2004. Report on the misuse of science in the administrations of George H.W. Bush (1989–1993) and William J. Clinton (1993–2001). By the Students in ENVS 4800: Maymester, University of Colorado, June.Google Scholar
- Pielke Jr., Roger, and Roberta, Klein (eds.). 2009. Presidential science advisors: Perspectives and reflections on science, policy and politics (in press).Google Scholar
- Pielke, Roger. 2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Press, Frank, and Philip M. Smith. 2009. Science and technology in the Carter Presidency. In Presidential science advisors: Perspectives and reflections on science, policy and politics, eds. Pielke Jr., Roger, and Roberta, Klein (in press).Google Scholar
- Rigden, John. 2007. Eisenhower, scientists, and sputnik. Physics Today (June): 49.Google Scholar
- Sarewitz, Daniel. 2007. Does science policy matter? Issues in Science and Technology (Summer): 31–38.Google Scholar
- Schultz, William. 2001. Advising the president. Chemical and Engineering News 79: 23–27.Google Scholar
- UCS (Union of Concerned Scientists). 2004a. Scientific integrity in policy making: An investigation into the Bush administration’s misuse of science. Union of Concerned Scientists. March. http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/scientific_integrity/RSI_final_fullreport_1.pdf.
- UCS (Union of Concerned Scientists). 2004b. Scientific integrity in policy making: Further investigation of the Bush administration’s misuse of science. Union of Concerned Scientists. July. http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/scientific_integrity/Scientific_Integrity_in_Policy_Making_July_2004_1.pdf.
- Waxman, Henry. 2003. Politics and science in the Bush administration. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee of Government Reform. Political Science (Wellington, N.Z.) (November): 13. http://democrats.reform.house.gov/features/politics_and_science/pdfs/pdf_politics_and_science_rep.pdf.
- Woolley, John, and Gerhard Peters. 2007a. The American presidency project. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California (hosted), Gerhard Peters (database). http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=5968. Accessed 10 August 2007.
- Woolley, John, and Gerhard Peters. 2007b. The American presidency project. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California (hosted), Gerhard Peters (database). http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=30416. Accessed 10 August 2007.
- Yankelovich, Daniel. 2003. Winning greater influence for science. Issues in Science and Technology 19 (Summer).Google Scholar