A Common Frame for Formal Imagination
- 76 Downloads
In this paper, we review three influential theories of imagination in order to understand how the dynamics of imagination acts could be modeled using formal languages. While reviewing them, we notice that they are not detailed enough to account for all the mechanisms involved in creating and developing imaginary worlds. We claim those theories could be further refined into what we call the Common Frame for Imagination Acts, which defines a framework that can be used to study the dynamics of imagination using formal languages, and we support our claim by showing how the framework allows to model certain imagination acts step by step. Then, we introduce the Rhombus of Imagination, which is a visual tool that can be used in conjunction with our framework to study the procedural structure of different kinds of imagination acts and identify their dynamic properties.
KeywordsImagination Dynamic imagination Reality-oriented development Imaginary worlds Formal models
This work is funded by EC FP7 Grant 621403 (ERA Chair: Games Research Opportunities), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Grant No. EP/J004049), the project “Hybrid Intensional Logic” (Ref. FFI2013-47126-P) given by the Spanish “Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad” (MINECO) and a Doctoral Grant from the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC).
- Berto, F. (2014). On conceiving the inconsistent. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), Wiley Online Library, vol. 114, 1.1, pp. 103–121.Google Scholar
- Casas-Roma, J., Huertas, A., & Elena Rodríguez, M. (2019). The logic of imagination acts: A formal system for the dynamics of imaginary worlds. Erkenntnis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00136-z.
- Costa-Leite, A. (2011). Logical properties of imagination. Abstracta, 6(1), 103–116.Google Scholar
- Kind, A. (2016a). Desire-like imagination. In A. Kind (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination (pp. 163–176). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kind, A. (2016b). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. Taylor & Francis Group: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1978). Truth in fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15(1), 37–46.Google Scholar
- Shirazi, A., & Amir, E. (2007). Probabilistic modal logic. In R. Holte, A. Howe, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 489–495.Google Scholar
- Sinhababu, N. (2016). Imagination and belief. In A. Kind (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination (pp. 111–123). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sorensen, R. A. (1992). Thought experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Velazquez Quesada, F. R. (2011). Small steps in dynamics of information. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation.Google Scholar
- Walton, K. L. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar