The Civic Role of Online Service Providers
- 99 Downloads
In a recent report,1 the UK Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Committee focused on the role and responsibilities of online service providers (OSPs) with respect to the circulation of fake news and their impact on democratic processes, like public debate and political elections. The first recommendation offered in the report calls for “compulsory Code of Ethics for tech companies overseen by independent regulator”. The recommendation is sensible and should be adopted. Scholars working in the area of digital ethics have often stressed the need for a code of ethics shaping the conduct of OSPs (Taddeo and Floridi 2017). And an authority with teeth enforcing the code should be a measure welcome by the public sector, civil society, and OSPs themselves. On the one hand, the authority would ensure that OSPs respect essential values and principles safeguarding users’ rights and fundamental processes of our societies. On the other hand, an authority endorsing a code of...
- Broeders, D., & Taylor, L. (2017). Does great power come with great responsibility? The need to talk about corporate political responsibility. In M. Taddeo & L. Floridi (Eds.), The responsibilities of online service providers (Vol. 31, pp. 315–323). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47852-4_17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cowls, J., & Floridi, L. (2018). Prolegomena to a white paper on an ethical framework for a good AI society. SSRN scholarly paper ID 3198732. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3198732.
- Floridi, L. (2014a). The fourth revolution, how the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Floridi, L. (2014b). The onlife manifesto—Being human in a hyperconnected era. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Freeman, J. (1999). Private parties, public functions and the new administrative law. SSRN scholarly paper ID 165988. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=165988.
- Hasebrink, U. (2008). Comparing children’s online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU kids online: [European research on cultural, contextual and risk issues in children’s safe use of the internet and new media (2006–2009)]. London: EU Kids Online. http://www.eukidsonline.net/.
- Hinman, L. (2005). Esse est indicato in Google: Ethical and political issues in search engines. International Review of Information Ethics, 3(6), 19–25.Google Scholar
- Introna, L. D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Shaping the web: Why the politics of search engines matters. SSRN scholarly paper ID 222009. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=222009.
- McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Metoyer-Duran, C. (1993). Information gatekeepers. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 28, 111–150.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, A. L. (2000). The control revolution: How the internet is putting individuals in charge and changing the world we know (2nd ed.). New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
- Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. With a new afterword by the author edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Taddeo, M. (2012b). An analysis for a just cyber warfare. In 2012 4th international conference on cyber conflict (CYCON 2012) (pp. 1–10).Google Scholar
- Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (Eds.). (2017). The responsibilities of online service providers. New York: Springer.Google Scholar