Advertisement

Minds and Machines

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 565–568 | Cite as

Trusting Digital Technologies Correctly

  • Mariarosaria Taddeo
Article

Trust is a facilitator of interactions among the members of a system, whether these be human agents, artificial agents or a combination of both (a hybrid system). Elsewhere, I have argued that the occurrences of trust are related to, and affect, pre-existing relations, like purchasing, negotiation, communication, and delegation (Taddeo 2010a, b). Trust is not to be considered a relation itself but a property of relations, something that changes the way relations occur. Consider, for example, a case of communication. Alice talks to Bob and she informs him that the grocery store down the road is closed for the day As Bob trusts Alice, he believes her and decides not to walk to the shop to double check, instead he starts searching for an alternative place to shop for his groceries. Between Alice and Bob there is a first-order relation, the communication, which ranges over the two agents, and there is the second-order propertyof trust that ranges over the first-order-relation and affects...

References

  1. Floridi, L. (2002). On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(4), 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Floridi, L. (2011). The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution, how the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Floridi, L. (2016a). Mature information societies—A matter of expectations. Philosophy & Technology, 29(1), 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0214-6.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Floridi, L. (2016b). Tolerant paternalism: Pro-ethical design as a resolution of the dilemma of toleration. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(6), 1669–1688.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9733-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Floridi, L. (2016c). Faultless responsibility: On the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083), 20160112.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Floridi, Luciano, & Taddeo, Mariarosaria. (2016). What is data ethics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083), 20160360.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Primiero, Giuseppe, & Taddeo, Mariarosaria. (2012). A modal type theory for formalizing trusted communications. Journal of Applied Logic, 10(1), 92–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2011.12.002.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Taddeo, M. (2010a). Modelling trust in artificial agents, a first step toward the analysis of e-trust. Minds and Machines, 20(2), 243–257.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9201-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Taddeo, M. (2010b). An Information-based Solution for the Puzzle of Testimony and Trust. Social Epistemology, 24(4), 285–299.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2010.521863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Taddeo, M. (2013). Cyber security and individual rights, striking the right balance. Philosophy & Technology, 26(4), 353–356.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-013-0140-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Transparent, explainable, and accountable AI for robotics. Science Robotics, 2(6), eaan6080.  https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aan6080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oxford Internet InstituteUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.The Alan Turing InstituteLondonUK

Personalised recommendations