The Revenge of Ecological Rationality: Strategy-Selection by Meta-Induction Within Changing Environments
- 489 Downloads
According to the paradigm of adaptive rationality, successful inference and prediction methods tend to be local and frugal. As a complement to work within this paradigm, we investigate the problem of selecting an optimal combination of prediction methods from a given toolbox of such local methods, in the context of changing environments. These selection methods are called meta-inductive (MI) strategies, if they are based on the success-records of the toolbox-methods. No absolutely optimal MI strategy exists—a fact that we call the “revenge of ecological rationality”. Nevertheless one can show that a certain MI strategy exists, called “AW”, which is universally long-run optimal, with provably small short-run losses, in comparison to any set of prediction methods that it can use as input. We call this property universal access-optimality. Local and short-run improvements over AW are possible, but only at the cost of forfeiting universal access-optimality. The last part of the paper includes an empirical study of MI strategies in application to an 8-year-long data set from the Monash University Footy Tipping Competition.
KeywordsPrediction task Adaptive rationality Strategy selection Meta-induction Online learning
Work on this paper was supported by the DFG Grant SCHU1566/9-1 as part of the priority program “New Frameworks of Rationality” (SPP 1516). For valuable help we are indebted to K.V. Katsikopolous, Ö. Simsek, A.P. Pedersen, R. Hertwig, M. Jekel, P. Grunwald, J.-W. Romeijn, and L. Martignon.
- Brighton, H. & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). How heuristics handle uncertainty. In Todd & Gigerenzer (eds.), (pp. 33–60). (Note: This article is an abbreviated version of Gigerenzer and Brighton 2009.)Google Scholar
- Czerlinski, J., Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). How good are simple heuristics? In: Gigerenzer et al. (Eds.), (pp. 97–118). Google Scholar
- Dieckmann, A., & Todd, P. M. (2012). Simple rules for ordering cues in one-reason decision making. In: Todd & Gigerenzer (Eds.), (pp. 274–306).Google Scholar
- Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & The ABC Research Group (Eds.). (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
- Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., & The ABC Research Group. (2013). Simple heuristics in a social world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (1996). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (2nd ed.). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
- Martignon, L., & Hoffrage, U. (1999). Why does one-reason decision making work? In: Gigerenzer et al. (Eds.), (pp. 119–140).Google Scholar
- Popper, K. (1935/2002). Logic of discovery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rieskamp, J., & Dieckmann, A. (2012). Redundancy: Environment structure that simple heuristics can exploit. In Todd & Gigerenzer (eds.), (pp. 187–215).Google Scholar
- Schurz, G. (2013). Philosophy of science: A unified approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schurz, G., & Thorn, P. (2014). TTB vs. Franklin’s rule in environments of different redundancy. Appendix to G. Schurz, Instrumental justifications of normative systems of reasoning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, article 625, July 2014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00625.
- Shanks, D. R., Douglas, L. M., & Holyoak, K. J. (Eds.). (1996). The psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Solomonoff, R.J. (1964). A formal theory of inductive inference. Information and Control, 7, 1–22 (part I), 224–254 (part II).Google Scholar
- Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (Eds.). (2012). Ecological rationality: intelligence in the world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Vickers, J. (2010). The problem of induction. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/induction-problem.
- Wells, A. J. (2005). Rethinking cognitive computation: Turing and the science of the mind. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar