Minds and Machines

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 361–387

Computing as a Science: A Survey of Competing Viewpoints


DOI: 10.1007/s11023-011-9240-4

Cite this article as:
Tedre, M. Minds & Machines (2011) 21: 361. doi:10.1007/s11023-011-9240-4


Since the birth of computing as an academic discipline, the disciplinary identity of computing has been debated fiercely. The most heated question has concerned the scientific status of computing. Some consider computing to be a natural science and some consider it to be an experimental science. Others argue that computing is bad science, whereas some say that computing is not a science at all. This survey article presents viewpoints for and against computing as a science. Those viewpoints are analyzed against basic positions in the philosophy of science. The article aims at giving the reader an overview, background, and a historical and theoretical frame of reference for understanding and interpreting some central questions in the debates about the disciplinary identity of computer science. The article argues that much of the discussion about the scientific nature of computing is misguided due to a deep conceptual uncertainty about science in general as well as computing in particular.


History of computer science Philosophy of computer science Computing as a discipline Computer science 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing, University of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland
  2. 2.Tumaini University, Iringa University CollegeIringaTanzania

Personalised recommendations