Minds and Machines

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 179–202 | Cite as

Descartes Among the Robots

Computer Science and the Inner/Outer Distinction


We consider the symbol grounding problem, and apply to it philosophical arguments against Cartesianism developed by Sellars and McDowell: the problematic issue is the dichotomy between inside and outside which the definition of a physical symbol system presupposes. Surprisingly, one can question this dichotomy and still do symbolic computation: a detailed examination of the hardware and software of serial ports shows this.


Physical symbol system Grounding problem Inner/outer Cartesianism 


  1. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2009). Why the mind is still in the head. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, Chap 5 (pp. 78–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2010). Causal theories of mental content. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2010 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/content-causal/.
  3. Boden, M. A. (1988). Computer models of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, R. (1990). Elephants don’t play chess. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6, 3–15.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 47, 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll, L. (1895). What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind 4, 278–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, A. (2001). Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Comer, D. E. (2005). Essentials of computer architecture. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Floridi, L., & Taddeo, M. (2005). Solving the symbol grounding problem: A critical review of fifteen years of research. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 17(4), 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glanzberg, M. (2009). Truth. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2009 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/truth/.
  12. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica, D42, 335–346. http://cogprints.org/3106/.
  13. Harnad, S. (2003). Symbol-grounding problem. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, LXVII(4), http://cogprints.org/3018/.
  14. Heidegger, M. (1979). Sein und Zeit (15th ed.). Tuebingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  15. Lawyer, D. S. (2008). The serial howto. http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Serial-HOWTO.html, available online at The Linux Documentation Project.
  16. McCulloch, G. (2002). Phenomenological externalism. In Smith (pp. 123–139).Google Scholar
  17. McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. McDowell, J. (1998). Singular thought and the extent of inner space. In Meaning, knowledge and reality (pp. 228–259). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Originally published in (1986) P. Pettit & J. McDowell (Eds.), Subject, thought and context. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  19. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  20. Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1976). Computer science as empirical enquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19(3), 1975 ACM Turing Award Lecture.Google Scholar
  22. Putnam, H. (1978). Meaning and the moral sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Sellars W. (1956) Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl & M. Scriven (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 1, pp. 253–329). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reprint of Sellars (1956).Google Scholar
  25. Smith, N. H. (Ed.). (2002). Reading McDowell: On mind and world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Stroud, B. (2002). Sense-experience and the grounding of thought. In Smith (pp. 79–91).Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, C. (2002). Foundationalism and the inner-outer distinction. In Smith (pp. 106–119).Google Scholar
  28. van Gelder, T. (1995). What might computation be, if not cognition? Journal of Philosophy, XCII(7), 343–381.Google Scholar
  29. Various Authors. (2009). Serial programming. Wikibooks, http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:Serial_Data_Communications
  30. White, G. G. (2004). The philosophy of programming languages. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information (pp. 237–247). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Wikipedia. (2009a). Processor register—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Processor_register&oldid=329987020, [Online; accessed 28-December-2009].
  32. Wikipedia. (2009b). Relocation (computer science)—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Relocation_(computer_science&oldid=328774935), [Online; accessed 28-December-2009].
  33. Ziemke, T. (1997). Rethinking grounding. In A. Riegler & M. Peschl (Eds.), Does representation need reality? (pp. 87–94). Vienna: Austrian Society for Cognitive Science. Proceedings of New Trends in Cognitive Science (NTCS 97): ASoCs Technical Report 91–01.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electronic Engineering and Computer ScienceQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations