Minds and Machines

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 533–564 | Cite as

The ERI-Designer: A Computer Model for the Arrangement of Furniture

  • Rafael Pérez y Pérez
  • Alfredo Aguilar
  • Santiago Negrete
Article

Abstract

This paper reports a computer program to generate novel designs for the arrangement of furniture within a simulated room. It is based on the engagement-reflection computer model of the creative processes. During engagement the system generates material in the form of sequences of actions (e.g. change the colours of the walls, include some furniture in the room, modify their colour, and so on) guided by content and knowledge constraints. During reflection, the system evaluates the composition produced so far and, if it is necessary, modifies it. We discuss the implementation of the system and some of its most salient features, especially the use of a computational model for creativity in the terrain of design. We argue that this kind of model opens new possibilities for the simulation of the design processes as well as the development of tools.

Keywords

Computational creativity Engagement-reflection Design Furniture arrangement 

References

  1. Balling, J. D., & Falkin, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 1, 5–28.Google Scholar
  2. Coyne, R. D., Newton, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1993). A connectionist view of creative design reasoning. In J. S. Gero & M. L. Maher (Eds.), Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design (pp. 177–209). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hilsdale.Google Scholar
  3. Fehrman, K. R., & Fehrman C. (2004). Color. The secret influence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  4. Gelernter, D. (1994). The muse in the machine. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  5. Gero, J. (1985). Expert systems in CAD, Computer-Aided Design (Vol. 17, Issue 9). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Gómez de Silva, A., & Zamora, A. (2004). A cognitive evaluation of a computer system for a generative mondrian-like artwork. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Design computing and cognition 04 (pp. 79–96). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Greene, J., & d’Oliveira, M. (1981). Methodology handbook. UK: The Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Janssen, P., Frazer, J., & Tang, M. (2002). Evolutionary systems and generative processes, Applied Intelligence (Vol. 16, pp. 119–128). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kellert, S. R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  10. Laurier, E. (2008a). Drinking up endings: Conversational resources of the cafe. Language and Communication, 28(2), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Laurier, E. (2008b). How breakfast happens in the cafe. Time and Society, 17(1), 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis, M., & Haviland-Jones, J. M. (2004). Handbook of emotions, (2nd ed). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lidwel, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2005). Principios Univerales del Diseño (original title: Universal Principles of Design), BLUME, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  14. Maher, M. L. (1985). HI-RISE and beyond: Directions for expert systems in design, Computer-Aided Design (Vol. 17, Issue 9). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. Maher, M. L., Fenves, S. J., & Garrett, J. H. (1988). Expert systems for structural design. In H. Adeli (Ed.), Expert systems in construction and structural engineering. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Mahnke, F. H. (1996). Color, environment, and human response. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  17. Michalewicz, Z. (1999). Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolutionary programs. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Pérez y Pérez, R. (2007). Employing emotions to drive plot generation in a computer-based storyteller. Cognitive Systems Research, 8(2), 89–109. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2006.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pérez y Pérez, R., & Sharples, M. (2001). MEXICA: A computer model of a cognitive account of creative writing. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 13(2), 119–139.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pullman, M. E., & Gross, M. A. (2004). Ability of experience design elements to elicit emotions and loyalty behaviors. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 551–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Puybaret, E. (2009). Sweet home 3d. http://www.sweethome3d.eu.
  22. Ritterfeld, U. (2002). Social heuristics in interior design preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Whitemyer D. (2009). Anthropology in design. http://www.iida.org/content.cfm/anthropology-in-design.
  24. Woodbury, R. F. (1993). A genetic approach to creative design. In J. S. Gero & M. L. Maher (Eds.), Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design (pp. 211–233). New Jersey: Hilsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Pérez y Pérez
    • 1
  • Alfredo Aguilar
    • 2
  • Santiago Negrete
    • 1
  1. 1.División de Ciencias de la Comunicación y DiseñoUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad CuajimalpaMexico D. F.Mexico
  2. 2.Posgrado en Ciencias de la ComputaciónUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico D. F.Mexico

Personalised recommendations