Are Turing Machines Platonists? Inferentialism and the Computational Theory of Mind
- 304 Downloads
We first discuss Michael Dummett’s philosophy of mathematics and Robert Brandom’s philosophy of language to demonstrate that inferentialism entails the falsity of Church’s Thesis and, as a consequence, the Computational Theory of Mind. This amounts to an entirely novel critique of mechanism in the philosophy of mind, one we show to have tremendous advantages over the traditional Lucas-Penrose argument.
KeywordsMechanism Church’s thesis Computational theory of mind Dualism Inferentialism Platonism Lucas-Penrose argument Brandom Dummett Detlefsen Wright
- Benacerraf, P. (1967). God, the devil and Gödel. The Monist, 51, 9–32.Google Scholar
- Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons (an introduction to inferentialism). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cogburn, J. (2004). The philosophical basis of what? The anti-realist case for dialethism. In G. Priest, J. C. Beall, & B. Armour Garb (Eds.), The law of non-contradiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cogburn, J. (2005c). Inferentialism and tacit knowledge. Behavior and Philosophy, 32, 503–524.Google Scholar
- Dummett, M. (1991). The logical basis of metaphysics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Epstein, R. L., & Carnielli, A. (1999). Computability: Computable functions, logic, and the foundations of mathematics. Wadsworth: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
- Gödel, K. (1951). Josiah Willard Gibbs lecture. In S. Feferman (Ed.), K. Gödel collected works (Vol. III). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lucas, J. R. (2002). The Gödelian argument: Turn over the page. http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jrlucas/turn.html. Cited October 4, 2002.
- Penrose, R. (1989). The emperor’s new mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Putnam, H. (1960). Minds and machines. In S. Hook (Ed.), Dimensions of mind (pp. 138–164). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Sellars, W. (1980). Inference and meaning. In J. Sicha (Ed.), Pure pragmatics and possible worlds. Reseda: Ridgeview Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Tenant, N. (1997). The taming of the true. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar