Minds and Machines

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 243–257 | Cite as

Modelling Trust in Artificial Agents, A First Step Toward the Analysis of e-Trust

Article

Abstract

This paper provides a new analysis of e-trust, trust occurring in digital contexts, among the artificial agents of a distributed artificial system. The analysis endorses a non-psychological approach and rests on a Kantian regulative ideal of a rational agent, able to choose the best option for itself, given a specific scenario and a goal to achieve. The paper first introduces e-trust describing its relevance for the contemporary society and then presents a new theoretical analysis of this phenomenon. The analysis first focuses on an agent’s trustworthiness, this one is presented as the necessary requirement for e-trust to occur. Then, a new definition of e-trust as a second-order-property of first-order relations is presented. It is shown that the second-order-property of e-trust has the effect of minimising an agent’s effort and commitment in the achievement of a given goal. On this basis, a method is provided for the objective assessment of the levels of e-trust occurring among the artificial agents of a distributed artificial system.

Keywords

Artificial agent Artificial distributed system e-Trust Trust Trustworthiness 

References

  1. Castelfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (1998). Principles of trust for MAS: Cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification. In Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS’98). Paris: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  2. Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). On-line trust: Concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 737–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Vries, P. (2006). Social presence as a conduit to the social dimensions of online trust. In W. IJsselsteijn, Y. de Kort, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & E. van den Hoven (Eds.), Persuasive technology (pp. 55–59). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Floridi, L. (2008). The method of levels of abstraction. Minds and Machines, 18(3), 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3), 349–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gambetta, D. (1998). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213–238). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Guttman, R., Moukas, A., Maes, P. (1998). Agent-mediated electronic commerce: A survey. Knowledge Engineering Review, 13(2), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lagenspetz, O. (1992). Legitimacy and trust. Philosophical Investigations, 15(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Nissenbaum, H. (2001). Securing trust online: Wisdom or oxymoron. Boston University Law Review, 81(3), 635–664.Google Scholar
  11. Nwana, H., Rosenschein, J., et al. (1998). Agent-mediated electronic commerce: Issues, challenges and some viewpoints. Autonomous Agents 98, ACM Press.Google Scholar
  12. Papadopoulou, P. (2007). Applying virtual reality for trust-building e-commerce environments. Virtual Reality, 11(2–3), 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Seamons, K. E., Winslett, M., Yu, T., Lu, L., Jarvis, R. (2003). Protecting privacy during on-line trust negotiation. In R. Dingledine, P. Syverson, et al. (Eds.), Privacy enhancing technologies (pp. 249–253). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Taddeo, M. (2009). Defining trust and e-trust: Old theories and new problems. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 5(2), 23–35.Google Scholar
  15. Tuomela, M., & Hofmann, S. (2003). Simulating rational social normative trust, predictive trust, and predictive reliance between agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 5(3), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weckert, J. (2005). Trust in cyberspace. In R. J. Cavalier (Ed.), The impact of the internet on our moral lives (pp. 95–120). Albany: University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Wooldridge, M. (2002). An introduction to multiagent systems. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information Ethics GroupUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of HertfordshireHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations