Mental Health Services Research

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 5–20 | Cite as

Identifying and Selecting the Common Elements of Evidence Based Interventions: A Distillation and Matching Model

  • Bruce F. Chorpita
  • Eric L. Daleiden
  • John R. Weisz


A model is proposed whereby the intervention literature can be empirically factored or distilled to derive profiles from evidence-based approaches. The profiles can then be matched to individual clients based on consideration of their target problems, as well as demographic and contextual factors. Application of the model is illustrated by an analysis of the youth treatment literature. Benefits of the model include its potential to facilitate improved understanding of similarities and differences among treatments, to guide treatment selection and matching to clients, to address gaps in the literature, and to point to possibilities for new interventions based on the current research base.

Key words

evidence-based practice common elements distillation matching 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Addis, M. E., Wade, W. A., & Hatgis, C. (1999). Barriers to dissemination of evidence-based practices: Addressing practitioners’ concerns about manual-based psychotherapies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 430–441.Google Scholar
  2. Barkley, R. A. (1997). Defiant children: A clinician’s manual for assessment and parent training (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  3. Beutler, L. E. (1991). Have all won and must all have prizes? Revisiting Luborsky et al.’s verdict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 226–232.Google Scholar
  4. Beutler, L. E. (2002). The dodo bird is extinct. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 30–34.Google Scholar
  5. Brodley, C. E., Lane, T., & Stough, T. M. (1999). Knowledge discovery and data mining. American Scientist, 87, 54–61.Google Scholar
  6. Chambless, D. L. (2002). Beware the dodo bird: The dangers of overgeneralization. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 13–16.Google Scholar
  7. Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7–18.Google Scholar
  8. Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685–716.Google Scholar
  9. Chambless, D. L., Sanderson, W. C., Shoham, V., Johnson, S. B., Pope, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. The Clinical Psychologist, 49, 5–18.Google Scholar
  10. Chorpita, B. F., Daleiden, E. L., & Weisz, J. R. (2003). Modularity in the design and application of therapeutic interventions. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  11. Chorpita, B. F., Taylor, A. A., Francis, S. E., Moffitt, C. E., & Austin, A. A. (2004). Efficacy of modular cognitive behavior therapy for childhood anxiety disorders. Behavior Therapy, 35, 263–287.Google Scholar
  12. Chorpita, B. F., Yim, L. M., Donkervoet, J. C., Arensdorf, A., Amundsen, M. J., McGee, C., et al. (2002). Toward large-scale implementation of empirically supported treatments for children: A review and observations by the Hawaii Empirical Basis to Services Task Force. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawes, R. M. (1992). Quandary: Correlation coefficients and contexts. In L. Montada, S. Filipp, et al. (Eds.), Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood (pp. 521–528). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy. Quarterly Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 3, 41.Google Scholar
  15. Fayyad, U. M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996). Data mining and knowledge discovery in databases: An overview. Communications of the ACM, 39, 27–34.Google Scholar
  16. Greenwald, P., & Cullen, J. W. (1984). The scientific approach to cancer control. CA – A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 34, 328–332.Google Scholar
  17. Kass, G. V. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Applied Statistics, 29, 119–127.Google Scholar
  18. Kazdin, A. E., Bass, D., Ayers, W. A., & Rodgers, A. (1990). Empirical and clinical focus of child and adolescent psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 729–740.Google Scholar
  19. Kendall, P. C. (1990). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxious children: Therapist manual. Ardmore, PA: Workbook.Google Scholar
  20. Kiesler, D. J. (1966). Some myths of psychotherapy research and the search for a paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 110–136.Google Scholar
  21. King, N. J., & Ollendick, T. H. (1998). Empirically validated treatments in clinical psychology. Australian Psychologist, 33, 89–95.Google Scholar
  22. Lonigan, C. J., Elbert, J. C., & Bennett Johnson, S. (1998). Empirically supported psychosocial interventions for children: An overview. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 138–145.Google Scholar
  23. Luborsky, L., Rosenthal, R., Diguer, L., Andrusyna, T. P., Berman, J. S., Levitt, J. T., et al. (2002). The dodo bird verdict is alive and well—mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 2–12.Google Scholar
  24. Luborsky, L., Singer, B., & Luborsky, L. (1975). Comparative studies of psychotherapies: Is it true that “everyone has won and all must have prizes”? Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 995–1008.Google Scholar
  25. National Institutes of Health. (1994). Behavioral therapies development program. NIH Guide, 22(26). The URL is
  26. Paul, G. L. (1967). Outcome research in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 31, 109–118.Google Scholar
  27. Rounsaville, B. J., & Carroll, K. M. (2002). Commentary on dodo bird revisited: Why aren’t we dodos yet? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 17–20.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures, Division of Clinical Psychology, American Psychological Association. (1995). Training in and dissemination of empirically-validated psychological treatments: Report and recommendations. The Clinical Psychologist, 48, 3–23.Google Scholar
  30. Task Force on Psychological Intervention Guidelines, American Psychological Association. (1995). Template for developing guidelines: Interventions for mental disorders and psychosocial aspects of physical disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  31. Weersing, V. R., Weisz, J. R., & Donenberg, G. R. (2002). Development of the Therapy Procedures Checklist: A therapist-report measure of technique use in child and adolescent treatment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 168–180.Google Scholar
  32. Weiss, B., & Weisz, J. R. (1995). Relative effectiveness of behavioral and nonbehavioral child psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 317–320.Google Scholar
  33. Weisz, J. R. (2004). Psychotherapy for children and adolescents: Evidence-based treatments and case examples. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Weisz, J. R., Chorpita, B. F., Duan, N., Glisson, C., Green, E. P., Hoagwood, K. H., et al. (2003). Research network on youth mental health: Evidence-based practice for children and adolescents. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
  35. Weisz, J. R., Donenberg, G. R., Han, S. S., & Weiss, B. (1995). Bridging the gap between laboratory and clinic in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 688–701.Google Scholar
  36. Weisz, J. R., & Hawley, K. M. (1998). Finding, evaluating, refining, and applying empirically supported treatments for children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 206–216.Google Scholar
  37. Weisz, J. R., Weersing, V. R., Valeri, S. M., & McCarty, C. A. (1999). Therapist’s Manual PASCET: Primary and secondary control enhancement training program. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
  38. Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., Alicke, M. D., & Klotz, M. L. (1987). Effectiveness of psychotherapy with children and adolescents: A meta-analysis for clinicians. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 542–549.Google Scholar
  39. Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., Han, S., Granger, D. A., & Morton, T. (1995). Effects of psychotherapy with children and adolescents revisited: A meta-analysis of treatment outcome studies. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 450–468.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce F. Chorpita
    • 1
    • 4
  • Eric L. Daleiden
    • 2
  • John R. Weisz
    • 3
  1. 1.University of HawaiiHonolulu
  2. 2.Child and Adolescent Mental Health DivisionHawaii Department of HealthHonolulu
  3. 3.University of CaliforniaLos Angeles
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Hawai’i at Mānoa, 2430 Campus RoadHonolulu

Personalised recommendations