Advertisement

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 291–297 | Cite as

Compulsory administration of oxytocin does not result in genuine moral enhancement

  • Vojin Rakić
Scientific Contribution

Abstract

The question will be raised whether oxytocin can serve as an effective moral enhancer. Different types of moral enhancement will be addressed, one of them being compulsory moral enhancement. It will be argued that oxytocin cannot serve as an effective moral enhancer if its use is being made compulsory. Hence, compulsory administration of oxytocin does not result in genuine moral enhancement. In order to demonstrate this, a stipulation of the main potentially beneficial outcomes of using oxytocin as a moral enhancer will be offered, as well as a discussion of objections to the notion that oxytocin can be an effective moral enhancer. It will be concluded that mandatory administration of oxytocin is ineffective because of a combination of two reasons: (1) mandatory administration of oxytocin renders moral reflection practically superfluous; (2) without moral reflection the beneficial outcomes of the use of oxytocin do not outweigh its drawbacks to the degree that we could speak of effective moral enhancement.

Keywords

Moral enhancement Oxytocin Benefits Objections Moral reflection Moral behavior Outcomes Compulsion Effectiveness 

References

  1. Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vonlanthen, A., Fischbacher, U., and Fehr, E. 2008. Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron 58: 639–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Dreu, C. K., Greer, L. L., Van Kleef, G. A., Shalvi, S., and Handgraaf, M. J. 2011. Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. Proceedings of the National Academy Science USA 108 (4): 1262–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gimpl, G., and Fahrenholz, F. 2001. The oxytocin receptor system: structure, function, and regulation. Physiological Reviews 81 (2): 629–683.Google Scholar
  4. Harris, J. 2010. Moral enhancement and freedom. Bioethics 25 (2): 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hurlemann R, Patin A, Onur OA, Cohen MX, Baumgartner T, Metzler S et al. 2010. Oxytocin enhances amygdala-dependent, socially reinforced learning and emotional empathy in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience 30 (14): 4999–5007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., and Fehr, E. 2005. Oxytocinincreases trust in humans. Nature 435: 673–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lane, A., Luminet, O., Rimé, B., Gross, J. J., de Timary, P., and Mikolajczak, M. 2013. Oxytocin increases willingness to socially share one’s emotions. International Journal of Psychology 48 (4): 676–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lane, A., Mikolajczak, M., Treinen, E., Samson, D., Corneille, O., de Timary, P., and Luminet, O. 2015. Failed replication of oxytocin effects on trust: The envelope task case. PloS ONE 10 (9): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marazziti, D., Dell’Osso, B., Baroni, S., Mungai, F., Catena, M., Rucci, P., Albanese, F., Giannaccini, G., Betti, L., Fabbrini, L., Italiani, P., Del Debbio, A., Lucacchini, A., and Dell’Osso, L. 2006. A relationship between oxytocin and anxiety of romantic attachment. Clinical Practice Epidemiology Mental Health 2 (1): 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McGregor, I. S., and Bowen, M. T. 2012. Breaking the loop: Oxytocin as a potential treatment for drug addiction. Hormones and Behavior 61: 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mikolajczak, M., Gross, J. J., Lane, A., Corneille, O., de Timary, P., and Luminet, O. 2010. Oxytocin makes people trusting, not gullible. Psychological science 21 (8): 1072–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Persson, I, Savulescu, J. 2008. The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 2008; 25: 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Persson, I., and Savulescu. 2012. Unfit for the future: The need for moral enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Persson, I., and Savulescu, J. 2014. Should moral bioenhancement be compulsory? reply to Vojin Rakic. Journal of Medical Ethics 40: 251–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rakić, V. 2014. Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias. Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (4): 246–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raus K, Focquaert F, Schermer M, Specker J, and Sterckx S. 2014. On defining moral enhancement, a clarificatory taxonomy. Neuroethics 7 (3): 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scheele, D., Striepens, N., Güntürkün, O., Deutschländer, S., Maier, W., Kendrick, K. M., and Hurlemann, R. 2012. Oxytocin modulates social distance between males and females. The Journal of Neuroscience 32 (46): 16074–16079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Fischer, M., Dvash, J., Harari, H., Perach-Bloom, N., and Levkovitz, Y. 2009. Intranasal administration of oxytocin increases envy and schadenfreude (delight in the misfortunes of others). Biological Psychiatry 66 (9): 864–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simkulet, William. 2012. On moral enhancement. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4): 17–18.Google Scholar
  20. Singer, T., Snozzi, R., Bird, G., Petrovic, P., Silani, G., Heinrichs, M., and Dolan, R. J. 2008. Effects of oxytocin and prosocial behavior on brain responses to direct and vicariously experienced pain. Emotion 8 (6): 781–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Theodoridou, A., Rowe, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., and Rogers, P. J. 2009. Oxytocin and social perception: Oxytocin increases perceived facial trustworthiness and attractiveness. Hormones and Behavior 56 (1): 128–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wathes, D. C., Swann, R. W., Pickering, B. T., Porter, D. G., Hull, M. G., and Drife, J. O. 1982. Neurohypophysial hormones in the human ovary. Lancet 2 (8295): 410–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wiseman, H. 2014. SSRIs as moral enhancement interventions: A practical dead end. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3): 1–10.Google Scholar
  24. Zak, P. J., Stanton, A. A., and Ahmadi, S. 2007. Oxytocin increases generosity in humans. PLoS ONE 2 (11): e1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Study of Bioethics, Institute for Social Sciences, European Division of the UNESCO Chair in BioethicsUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations