Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 3–11 | Cite as

Ethical issues in nanomedicine: Tempest in a teapot?

  • Irit Allon
  • Ahmi Ben-Yehudah
  • Raz Dekel
  • Jan-Helge Solbakk
  • Klaus-Michael Weltring
  • Gil Siegal
Scientific Contribution

Abstract

Nanomedicine offers remarkable options for new therapeutic avenues. As methods in nanomedicine advance, ethical questions conjunctly arise. Nanomedicine is an exceptional niche in several aspects as it reflects risks and uncertainties not encountered in other areas of medical research or practice. Nanomedicine partially overlaps, partially interlocks and partially exceeds other medical disciplines. Some interpreters agree that advances in nanotechnology may pose varied ethical challenges, whilst others argue that these challenges are not new and that nanotechnology basically echoes recurrent bioethical dilemmas. The purpose of this article is to discuss some of the ethical issues related to nanomedicine and to reflect on the question whether nanomedicine generates ethical challenges of new and unique nature. Such a determination should have implications on regulatory processes and professional conducts and protocols in the future.

Keywords

Enhancement Ethics Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Risk Safety Social justice Uncertainty 

References

  1. Anderson, J.A., and J. Kimmelman. 2010. Extending clinical equipoise to phase 1 trials involving patients: unresolved problems. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20(1): 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics, 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, M.G., and R.J. Naranja Jr. 2013. Getting nano tattoos right—a checklist of legal and ethical hurdles for an emerging nanomedical technology. Nanomedicine 9(6): 729–731.Google Scholar
  4. Borak, J., and G. Sirianni. 2005. Hormesis: implications for cancer risk assessment. Dose Response 3(3): 443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braakhuis, H.M., A.G. Oomen, and F.R. Cassee. 2016. Grouping nanomaterials to predict their potential to induce pulmonary inflammation. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 15(299): 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. British Medical Association. 2001. Research and experimentation on humans. In The medical profession & human rights. Handbook for a changing agenda, 205–240. London: Zed Books, Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Buzea, C., I.I. Pacheco Blandino, and K. Robbie. 2007. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2(4): MR17–MR172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Childress, J.F., R.R. Faden, R.D. Gaare, L.O. Goslin, J. Kahn, R.J. Bonnie, N.E. Kass, A.C. Mastroianni, J.D. Moreno, and P. Nieburg. 2002. Public health ethics: mapping the terrain. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30(2): 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, J.C. 2006. Managing the effects of nanotechnology. Woodrow Wilson Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. Washington, D.C. http://www.nanotechproject.org/publications/archive/managing_effects_nanotechnology/. Accessed 4 Aug 2015.
  10. Desai, N. 2012. Challenges in development of nanoparticle-based therapeutics. AAPS Journal 14(2): 282–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ding, H., and F. Wu. 2012. Image guided biodistribution and pharmacokinetic studies of theranostics. Theranostics 2(11): 1040–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donaldson, K. 2006. Resolving the nanoparticles paradox. Nanomedicine 1(2): 229–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drexler, K. Eric. 1986. Engines of creation: the coming era of nanotechnology. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  14. El Andaloussi, S., S. Lakhal, I. Mäger, and M.J. Wood. 2013. Exosomes for targeted siRNA delivery across biological barriers. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 65(3): 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geiser, M., B. Rothen-Rutishauser, N. Kapp, S. Schürch, W. Kreyling, H. Schulz, M. Semmler, V. Im Hof, J. Heyder, and P. Gehr. 2005. Ultrafine particles cross cellular membranes by nonphagocytic mechanisms in lungs and in cultured cells. Environmental Health Perspectives 113(11): 1555–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grunwald, A. 2005. Nanotechnology—a new field of ethical inquiry? Science and Engineering Ethics 11(2): 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Habets, M.G., J.J. van Delden, and A.L. Bredenoord. 2016. Studying the lay of the land: views and experiences of professionals in the translational pluripotent stem cell field. Regenerative Medicine 11(1): 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartzema, A.G., C.G. Reich, P.B. Ryan, P.E. Stang, D. Madigan, E. Welebob, and J.M. Overhage. 2013. Managing data quality for a drug safety surveillance system. Drug Safety 36(Suppl 1): S49–S58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoet, P., I. Brüske-Hohlfield, and O. Salata. 2004. Nanoparticles—known and unknown health risks. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2(1): 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnston, H., G. Pojana, S. Zuin, N.Raun Jacobsen, P. Moller, S. Loft, M. Semmler-Behnke, C. McGuiness, D. Balharry, A. Marcomini, H. Wallin, W. Krevling, K. Donaldson, L. Tran, and V. Stone. 2013. Engineered nanomaterial risk, lessons learnt from completed nanotoxicology studies: potential solutions to current and future challenges. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 43(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kubik, T., K. Bogunia-Kubik, and M. Sugisaka. 2005. Nanotechnology on duty in medical applications. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology 6(1): 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Landsiedel, R., L. Ma-Hock, A. Kroll, D. Hahn, J. Schnekenburger, K. Wiench, and W. Wohlleben. 2010. Testing metal-oxide nanomaterials for human safety. Advanced Materials 22: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lenk, C., and N. Biller-Andorno. 2007. Nanomedicine—emerging or re-emerging ethical issues? a discussion of four ethical themes. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10(2): 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mills, K., and C. Fledermann. 2005. Getting the best from nanotechnology: approaching social and ethical issues openly and proactively. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 24(4): 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nanomedicine market—global industry analysis, size, share, growth, trends and forecast. 2013–2019. Transparency market research. http://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/pressrelease/nanomedicine-market.htm.
  26. Nasterlack, M., A. Zober, and C. Oberlinner. 2008. Considerations on occupational medical surveillance in employees handling nanoparticles. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 81(6): 721–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nordmann, A., and A. Rip. 2009. Mind the gap revisited. Nature Nanotechnology 4: 273–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oberdörster, G., E. Oberdörster, and J. Oberdörster. 2005. Nanotoxicity: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environmental Health Perspectives 113(8): 23–39.Google Scholar
  29. Obermeier, B., Daneman R. Richard, and R.M. Ransohoff. 2013. Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood–brain barrier. Nature Medicine 19(12): 1584–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oftedal, G. 2014. The role of philosophy of science in Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): the case of nanomedicine. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 410: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Portnoy, E., B. Polyak, D. Inbar, G. Kenan, A. Rai, S.L. Wehrli, T.P. Roberts, A. Bishara, A. Mann, M. Shmuel, K. Rozovsky, G. Itzhak, T.B. Hur, S. Magdassi, D. Ekstein, and S. Eyal. 2016. Tracking inflammation in the epileptic rat brain by bi-functional fluorescent and magnetic nanoparticles. Nanomedicine (Ahead of print).Google Scholar
  32. Resnik, D. 2004. Fair drug prices and the patent system. Health Care Analysis 12(2): 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Resnik, D.B. 2012. Responsible conduct in nanomedicine research: environmental concerns beyond the common rule. Law, Medicine and Ethics 40(4): 848–855. (Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Resnik, D., and S. Tinkle. 2007a. Ethical issues in clinical trials involving nanomedicine. Contemporary Clinical Trials 28(4): 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Resnik, D.B., and S.S. Tinkle. 2007b. Ethics in nanomedicine. Nanomedicine (London) 2(3): 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rothman, S., and D. Rothman. 2003. The pursuit of perfection: the promise and perils of medical enhancement, 2003. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  37. Sadrieh, N. 2007. FDA considerations for regulation of nanomaterial containing products. Presentation slides. www.fda.gov/…/2006-4241B1-02-31-FDA-Nano%20Sadrieh%20nanot. Accessed 4 Mar 2015.
  38. Salbu, B. 2016. Environmental impact and risk assessments and key factors contributing to the overall uncertainties. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity (Ahead of print).Google Scholar
  39. Satalkar, P., B.S. Elger, and D.M. Shaw. 2015. Defining nano, nanotechnology and nanomedicine: why should it matter? Science and Engineering Ethics (Ahead of print).Google Scholar
  40. Schug, T.T., A.F. Johnson, D.M. Balshaw, S. Garantziotis, N.J. Walker, C. Weis, S.S. Nadadur, and L.S. Birnbaum. 2013. ONE nano: NIEHS’s strategic initiative on the health and safety effects of engineered nanomaterials. Environmental Health Perspectives 121(4): 410–414.Google Scholar
  41. Seipenbusch, M., A. Binder, and G. Kasper. 2008. Temporal evolution of nanoparticle aerosols in workplace exposure. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 52(8): 70–71.Google Scholar
  42. Sharma, R., N. Mody, U. Agrawal, and S.P. Vyas. 2016. Theranostic nanomedicine: a next generation platform for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry (Ahead of print).Google Scholar
  43. Siegal, G. 2015. NanoEthics and regulation. EuroNanomed II, Minutes of Consensus Meeting. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBJVu-g6ASo. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
  44. Solbakk, J.H. 2004. Uses and abuses of biomedical research. In: Ethical eye: biomedical research. 35–50. Strasbourg Cedex: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Solbakk, J.H., and S.M. Vidal. 2014. Clinical research in resource-poor settings. In Compendium and atlas of global bioethics, ed. H. ten Have, and B. Gordijn, 527–550. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Solbakk, J.H., and L. Zoloth. 2011. The tragedy of translation: the case of ‘‘first use’’ in human embryonic stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell 8: 479–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sweeney, A.E. 2015. Nanomedicine concepts in the general medical curriculum: initiating a discussion. International Journal of Nanomedicine 10: 7319–7331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taylor, R., S. Coulombe, T. Otanicar, P. Phelan, A. Gunawan, W. Lv, G. Rosengarten, R. Prasher, and H. Tyagi. 2013. Small particles, big impacts: a review of the diverse applications of nanofluids. Journal of Applied Physics 113: 011301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. The council of Canadian academies: small is different: a science perspective on the regulatory challenges of the nanoscale. http://www.scienceadvice.ca/uploads/eng/assessments%20and%20publications%20and%20news%20releases/nano/(2008_07_10)_report_on_nanotechnology.pdf.
  50. Tinkle, S., J. Antonini, B. Rich, J. Roberts, R. Salmen, K. DePree, and E. Adkins. 2003. Skin as a route of exposure in chronic beryllium disease. Environmental Health Perspectives 111(9): 1202–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. UNESCO. 2005. Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. In Adopted by UNESCO General Conference. 19 Oct.Google Scholar
  52. Uskoković, V. 2013. Entering the era of nanoscience: time to be so small. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology 9: 1441–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wynne, B. 1992. Uncertainty and environmental learning—reconceiving science in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change 2: 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yeagle, J. 2007. Nanotechnology and the FDA. Virginia Journal of Law and Technology 12(6): 2–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irit Allon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ahmi Ben-Yehudah
    • 1
  • Raz Dekel
    • 3
  • Jan-Helge Solbakk
    • 4
  • Klaus-Michael Weltring
    • 5
  • Gil Siegal
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
  1. 1.Chief Scientists OfficeMinistry of HealthJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Oral Pathology and Oral MedicineTel-Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Head of Occupational Medicine ServicesMinistry of HealthTel AvivIsrael
  4. 4.Centre for Medical Ethics FacultyMedicine University of OsloOsloNorway
  5. 5.WG Ethics at the European Technology Platform for NanomedicineMünsterGermany
  6. 6.University of Virginia School of LawCharlottesvilleUSA
  7. 7.Gertner Institute of Public Policy, Ministry of HealthOno Academic CollegeKiryat OnoIsrael
  8. 8.Center for Health Law, Bioethics and Health PolicyOno Academic CollegeKiryat OnoIsrael

Personalised recommendations