Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 143–154

On deciding to have a lobotomy: either lobotomies were justified or decisions under risk should not always seek to maximise expected utility

Scientific Contribution

Abstract

In the 1940s and 1950s thousands of lobotomies were performed on people with mental disorders. These operations were known to be dangerous, but thought to offer great hope. Nowadays, the lobotomies of the 1940s and 1950s are widely condemned. The consensus is that the practitioners who employed them were, at best, misguided enthusiasts, or, at worst, evil. In this paper I employ standard decision theory to understand and assess shifts in the evaluation of lobotomy. Textbooks of medical decision making generally recommend that decisions under risk are made so as to maximise expected utility (MEU) I show that using this procedure suggests that the 1940s and 1950s practice of psychosurgery was justifiable. In making sense of this finding we have a choice: Either we can accept that psychosurgery was justified, in which case condemnation of the lobotomists is misplaced. Or, we can conclude that the use of formal decision procedures, such as MEU, is problematic.

Keywords

Decision theory Lobotomy Psychosurgery Risk Uncertainty 

References

  1. Appelbaum, P., T. Grisso, E. Frank, S. O’Donnell, and D. Kupfer. 1999. Competence of depressed patients for consent to research. American Journal of Psychiatry 156: 1380–1384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Angell, M. 2005. The truth about the drug companies. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Barahal, H. 1958. 1,000 prefrontal lobotomies: a five to 10 year follow-up study. Psychiatric Quarterly 32: 652–678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D. 1982. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research 30: 961–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binder, D., and B. Iskandar. 2000. Modern neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders. Neurosurgery 47: 9–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. British Medical Journal Editorial. 1965. Prefrontal leucotomy. British Medical Journal 24: 1083–1084.Google Scholar
  7. Board of Control. 1947. Prefrontal leucotomy in 1000 cases. London: HMSO 1947.Google Scholar
  8. Burckhardt, G. 1891. Ueber Rindenexcisionen, als Beitrag zur operativen therapie der Psychosen. Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie 47: 463–548.Google Scholar
  9. Canadian Medical Association Journal Editorial. 1964. Standard lobotomy: The end of an era. Canadian Medical Association Journal 91: 1228.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, B. 1996. Is expected utility theory normative for medical decision making? Medical Decision Making 16: 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Curran, D., and P. Partridge. 1963. Psychological medicine, 5th ed. Edinburgh: E & S Livingstone Ltd.Google Scholar
  12. Day, E. 2008. He was so bad they put an ice pick in his brain. The observer Sunday 13 Jan available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/jan/13/neuroscience.medicalscience.
  13. Deutsch, A. 1948. The shame of the states. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  14. Dully, H., and C. Fleming. 2008. My lobotomy: A memoir. NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  15. El-Hai, J. 2005. The lobotomist. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Elliott, C. 1999. A philosophical disease: Bioethics, culture and identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Fleming, G. 1944. Prefrontal leucotomy. Journal of Mental Science XC: 486–500.Google Scholar
  18. Ford, H., and G. Jameson. 1955. Chlorpromazine in conjunction with other psychiatric therapies; a clinical appraisal. Diseases of the Nervous System 16: 179–185.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, W. 1949. Transorbital lobotomy. American Journal of Psychiatry 105: 734–740.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman, W. 1953. Level of achievement after lobotomy. American Journal of Psychiatry 110: 269–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman, W., and J. Watts. 1937. Prefrontal lobotomy in the treatment of mental disorders. Southern Medical Journal 30: 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freeman, W., and J. Watts. 1950. Psychosurgery, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Freeman, W., J. Watts, and T. Hunt. 1942. Psychosurgery. Springfield, Baltimore: Thomas.Google Scholar
  24. Friedman, S., B. Moore, C. Ranger, and C. Russman. 1951. A progress study of lobotomised and control patients. American Journal of Psychiatry 108: 10–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldbeck-Wood, S. 1996. Norway compensates lobotomy victims. British Medical Journal 313(708): 2.Google Scholar
  26. Greenblatt, M., and H. Soloman. 1953. Frontal lobes and schizophrenia. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Halter, A., and G. Dean. 1971. Decisions under uncertainty. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  28. Hunink, M., P. Glasziou, and M. Weinstein. 2001. Decision making in health and medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, J. 2009. A dark history: Memories of lobotomy in the new era of psychosurgery. Medicine Studies 1: 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, K. 2000. Insulin coma therapy in schizophrenia. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 93: 147–149.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrics 47: 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kirsch, I., B.J. Deacon, T.B. Huedo-Medina, A. Scoboria, T.J. Moore, et al. 2008. Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: A meta-analysis of data submitted to the food and drug administration. PLoS Med 5(2): e45. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kopeloff, N., and G. Kirby. 1923. Focal infection and mental disease. American Journal of Psychiatry 3: 149–197.Google Scholar
  34. Loomes, G., and R. Sugden. 1982. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal 92: 805–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luce, R., and H. Raiffa. 1967. Games and decisions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  36. Maisel, A. 1946. Bedlam 1946. Life. 6 May 1946, pp. 102–118.Google Scholar
  37. McKenzie, K., and G. Kaczanowski. 1964. Prefrontal leukotomy: A five-year controlled study. The Canadian Medical Association Journal 91: 1193–1196.Google Scholar
  38. Mill, J.S. 1991. On liberty and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Moniz, E. 1936. Essai d’un traitement chirurgical de certaines psychoses. Bulletin de l’Academie de Médicine, 115, 385-392. Translated as “Attempt at surgical treatment of certain psychoses”. Journal of Neurosurgery 1964(21): 1110–1114.Google Scholar
  40. Moniz, E. 1937. Prefrontal leucotomy in the treatment of mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 93: 1379–1385.Google Scholar
  41. O’Callaghan, M., and D. Carroll. 1982. Psychosurgery: A scientific analysis. Lancaster: MTP Press Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oltman, J., B. Brody, S. Friedman, and W. Green. 1949. Frontal lobotomy: Clinical experience with 107 cases in a state hospital. American Journal of Psychiatry 105: 742–751.Google Scholar
  43. Partridge, M. 1950. Pre-frontal leucotomy: A survey of 300 cases personally followed over 1½-3 years. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Penrose, L., and W. Marr. 1943. Results of shock therapy evaluated by estimating chances of patients remaining in hospital without such treatment. British Journal of Psychiatry 89: 374–380.Google Scholar
  45. Polatin, P., and E. Philtine. 1951. How psychiatry helps. Kingswood: The World’s Work.Google Scholar
  46. Pressman, J. 1998. Last resort: Psychosurgery and the limits of medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rao, G. 2007. Rational medical decision making. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Resnik, D. 2004. The precautionary principle and medical decision making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29: 281–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robin, A. 1958. A controlled study of the effects of leucotomy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 21: 262–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robin, A., and D. Macdonald. 1975. Lessons of leucotomy. London: Henry Kimpton Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Rupp, C., and E. Fletcher. 1940. Five to ten year follow-up study of 641 schizophrenic cases. American Journal of Psychiatry 96: 877–888.Google Scholar
  52. Sargant, W. 1967. The unquiet mind. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  53. Sargant, W., and E. Slater. 1964. Physical methods of treatment in psychiatry, 4th ed. Edinburgh: E & S Livingstone.Google Scholar
  54. Savage, L. 1954. The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  55. Schwartz, A., and G. Bergus. 2008. Medical decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Seabrook, W. 1935. Asylum. London: George G. Harrap and Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  57. Semelaigne, R. 1895. Sur la chirurgie cérébrale dans les aliénations mentales. Annales Médico- Psychologiques 1: 394–420.Google Scholar
  58. Silbermann, M., and J. Ransohoff. 1954. Medico-legal problems in psychosurgery. American Journal of Psychiatry 110: 801–808.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, R. 1996. Is regret theory an alternative basis for estimating the value of healthcare interventions? Health Policy 37: 105–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Sox, H., M. Blatt, M. Higgins, and K. Marton. 1988. Medical decision making. Boston: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  61. Sutherland, J. 2004. Should they de-Nobel Moniz? The guardian, Monday 2 August 2004, http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1274065,00.html.
  62. Tymstra, T. 1989. The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of “anticipated decision regret”. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 5: 207–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Valenstein, E. 1976. The practice of psychosurgery: A survey of the literature (1971-1976). Report to the U.S. commission for the protection of human subjects in biomedical and behavioral research, August 1, 1976, pp. 1–183. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. DHEW Pub. No. (OS)77-0002.Google Scholar
  64. Valenstein, E. 1986. Great and desperate cures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  65. White, W. 2003. A history of contempt: Countertransference and the dangers of service integration. Counselor: The Magazine for Addiction Professionals 4:20.Google Scholar
  66. Ziegler, L. 1943. Bilateral prefrontal lobotomy. American Journal of Psychiatry 100: 178–179.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations