Continuous sedation until death: moral justifications of physicians and nurses—a content analysis of opinion pieces
Continuous sedation until death (CSD), the act of reducing or removing the consciousness of an incurably ill patient until death, often provokes medical-ethical discussions in the opinion sections of medical and nursing journals. A content analysis of opinion pieces in medical and nursing literature was conducted to examine how clinicians define and describe CSD, and how they justify this practice morally. Most publications were written by physicians and published in palliative or general medicine journals. Terminal Sedation and Palliative Sedation are the most frequently used terms to describe CSD. Seventeen definitions with varying content were identified. CSD was found to be morally justified in 73 % of the publications using justifications such as Last Resort, Doctrine of Double Effect, Sanctity of Life, Autonomy, and Proportionality. The debate over CSD in the opinion sections of medical and nursing journals lacks uniform terms and definitions, and is profoundly marked by ‘charged language’, aiming at realizing agreement in attitude towards CSD. Not all of the moral justifications found are equally straightforward. To enable a more effective debate, the terms, definitions and justifications for CSD need to be further clarified.
KeywordsTerminal Sedation Palliative Sedation Deep Sedation Content analysis Opinions Palliative care Terminal care
- Billings, J.A., and S.D. Block. 1996. Slow euthanasia. The Journal of Palliative Care 12: 21–30.Google Scholar
- Broeckaert, B., A. Mullie, J. Gielen, M. Desmet, P. Vanden Berghe, and Stuurgroep Ethiek FPZV [Ethics Commission Federation Palliative Care Flanders]. 2010. Richtlijn palliatieve sedatie [Palliative sedation guideline]. http://www.pallialine.be/template.asp?f=rl_sedatie.htm#page=page-1. Accessed 2 Feb 2011.
- Committee on National Guideline for Palliative Sedation, Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG). 2009. Guideline for palliative sedation. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Medical Association. http://knmg.artsennet.nl/web/file?uuid=f3e026ba-23ec-47f1-a698-212153427fd7&owner=a8a9ce0e-f42b-47a5-960e-be08025b7b04&contentid=37350. Accessed 29 Feb 2012.
- Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. 2008. Sedation to unconsciousness in end-of-life care. CEJA Report 5-A-08. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/code-medical-ethics/2201a.pdf Accessed 17 Apr 2012.
- Mount, B. 1996. Morphine drips, terminal sedation, and slow euthanasia: Definitions and facts, not anecdotes. The Journal of Palliative Care 12: 31–37.Google Scholar
- Quill, T.E., B. Lo, and D.W. Brock. 1997. Palliative options of last resort: A comparison of voluntarily stopping eating and drinking, terminal sedation, physician-assisted suicide, and voluntary active euthanasia. The Journal of the American Medical Association 278: 2099–2104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rietjens, J.A., A. van der Heide, A.M. Vrakking, B.D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, P.J. van der Maas, and G. van der Wal. 2004. Physician reports of terminal sedation without hydration or nutrition for patients nearing death in the Netherlands. Annals of Internal Medicine 141: 178–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stevenson, C.L. 1969. Ethics and language. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Van Deijck, R.H., P.J. Krijnsen, J.G. Hasselaar, S.C. Verhagen, K.C. Vissers, and R.T. Koopmans. 2010. The practice of continuous palliative sedation in elderly patients: a nationwide explorative study among Dutch nursing home physicians. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 58: 1671–1678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ventafridda, V., C. Ripamonti, F. De Conno, M. Tamburini, and B.R. Cassileth. 1990. Symptom prevalence and control during cancer patients’ last days of life. The Journal of Palliative Care 6: 7–11.Google Scholar
- Wein, S. 2000. Sedation in the imminently dying patient. Oncology (Williston Park) 14: 585–592.Google Scholar