Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 443–455 | Cite as

Subject to empowerment: the constitution of power in an educational program for health professionals

  • Truls I. Juritzen
  • Eivind Engebretsen
  • Kristin Heggen
Scientific Contribution


Empowerment and user participation represents an ideal of power with a strong position in the health sector. In this article we use text analysis to investigate notions of power in a program plan for health workers focusing on empowerment. Issues addressed include: How are relationships of power between users and helpers described in the program plan? Which notions of user participation are embedded in the plan? The analysis is based on Foucault’s idea that power which is made subject to attempts of redistribution will re-emerge in other forms. How this happens, and with what consequences, is our analytical concern. The analysis is contrasted with ‘snapshots’ from everyday life in a nursing home. The program plan communicates empowerment as a democracy-building instrument that the users need. It is a tool for providing expert assistance to the user’s self-help. User participation is made into a tool which is external to the user him-/herself. Furthermore, the analysis shows that the plan’s image of empowerment presupposes an ‘élite user’ able to articulate personal needs and desires. This is not very applicable to the most vulnerable user groups, who thereby may end up in an even weaker position. By way of conclusion, we argue that an exchange of undesirable dominating paternalism for a desirable empowerment will not abolish power, but may result in more covert and subtle forms of power that are less open to criticism. The paper offers insights that will facilitate reflections on the premises for practising empowerment-oriented health care.


Deconstruction Elderly Empowerment Foucault Governmentality Linguistic power User participation 



This project has been financially supported by the Norwegian ExtraFoundation for Health and Rehabilitation through EXTRA funds.


  1. Adams, R. 1996. Social work and empowerment, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Asimakopoulou, K.G., P. Newton, and S. Scambler. 2010. “First do no harm”: the potential shortfalls of empowerment in diabetes. European Diabetes Nursing 7(2): 79–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cruikshank, B. 1999. The will to empower. Democratic citizens and other subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society, 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Derrida, J. 1997. Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Donzelot, J. 1979. The poverty of political culture. Ideology and Consciousness. 5: 73–86.Google Scholar
  7. Engebretsen, E. 2006. Barnevernet som tekst. Nærlesning av 15 utvalgte journaler fra 1950- og 1980-tallet. Faculty of Humanities, Univerisity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  8. Etterutdanning i brukermedvirkning (EiB). 2005. N.K.S. Kløverinstitusjoner as, Accessed 5 April 2011.
  9. Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical discourse analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Fleming, J., and D. Ward. 1999. Research as empowerment: the social action approach, empowerment practice: developing richer conceptual foundations. In Empowerment practice in social work: developing richer conceptual foundations, ed. L.M. Wells, and W. Shera. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press. Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge. Selected interviews & other writings 19721977. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M., and L.D. Kritzman (eds.). 1988. Politics, philosophy, culture interviews and other writings, 1977–1984. XXV, 330 s vols. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. 1990. The history of sexuality. An introduction Volume I. New York: Vintage Books, Random House, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. 2002a. Questions of method. In Power. Essential works of foucault 19541984 Vol. 3, ed. J.D. Faubion, 223–238, 3rd ed. London: Penguin books.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. 2002b. Omnes et singulatim. In Power. Essential works of Foucault 19541984 Vol. 3, ed. J.D. Faubion, 298–325, 3rd ed. London: Penguin books.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M., F. Ewald, M. Senellart, and A. Fontana. 2008. The birth of biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Freire, P. 1972. Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Hollnagel, H., and K. Malterud. 2000. From risk factors to health resources in medical practice. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3(3): 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karlsen, M.P., and K. Villadsen. 2008. Who should do the talking? The proliferation of dialogue as governmental technology. Culture and Organization 14(4): 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kristeva, J. 1984. Revolution in poetic language. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso: London and New York.Google Scholar
  22. Lorentzen, P. 2003. Fra tilskuer til deltaker. Samhandling og kommunikasjon med voksne utviklingshemmede. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  23. Mcfadden, D.L., and E.P. Burke. 1991. Developmental-disabilities and the new paradigm—directions for the 1990’s. Mental Retardation 29(1): R3–R6.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, P., and N. Rose. 2008. Governing the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Naue, U. 2008. ‘Self-care without a self’: Alzheimer’s disease and the concept of personal responsibility for health. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11(3): 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. 1999. LOV 1999-07-02 nr 63: Lov om pasientrettigheter (pasientrettighetsloven). Accessed 16 March 2011.
  27. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. 2009. 47. Samhandlingsreformen. Rett behandling—på rett sted—til rett tid. Acessed 16 March 2011.
  28. Paterson, B. 2001. Myth of empowerment in chronic illness. Journal of Advanced Nursing 34(5): 574–581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piper, S. 2010. Patient empowerment: emancipatory or technological practice? Patient Education and Counseling 79(2): 173–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Powers, P. 2003. Empowerment as treatment and the role of health professionals. Advances in Nursing Science 26(3): 227–237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Roberts, K.J. 1999. Patient empowerment in the United States: a critical commentary. Health Expectations 2(2): 82–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rose, N. 1999. Powers of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rose, N., P. O’Malley, and M. Valverde. 2006. Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2(1): 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Salmon, P., and G.M. Hall. 2003. Patient empowerment and control: a psychological discourse in the service of medicine. Social Science and Medicine 57(10): 1969–1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Salmon, P., and G.M. Hall. 2004. Patient empowerment or the emperor’s new clothes. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 97(2): 53–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schaap, A. 2000. Power and responsibility: should we spare the King’s head? Politics 20(3): 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seattle 2000 Decleration. 2000. Seattle 2000 Declaration on Self-Determination and Individualized Founding. Accessed 14 Dec 2010.
  38. Selbaek, G., O. Kirkevold, and K. Engedal. 2008. The course of psychiatric and behavioral symptoms and the use of psychotropic medication in patients with dementia in Norwegian nursing homes—a 12-month follow-up study. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 16(7): 528–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skelton, R. 1994. Nursing and empowerment: concepts and strategies. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19(3): 415–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Solomon, B.B. 1976. Black empowerment social work in oppressed communities. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Starrin, B., C. Heyerdahl, and O.P. Askheim. 2007. Empowerment i teori og praksis. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Truls I. Juritzen
    • 1
  • Eivind Engebretsen
    • 1
  • Kristin Heggen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and SocietyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations