One or two types of death? Attitudes of health professionals towards brain death and donation after circulatory death in three countries
- First Online:
- 628 Downloads
This study examined health professionals’ (HPs) experience, beliefs and attitudes towards brain death (BD) and two types of donation after circulatory death (DCD)—controlled and uncontrolled DCD. Five hundred and eighty-seven HPs likely to be involved in the process of organ procurement were interviewed in 14 hospitals with transplant programs in France, Spain and the US. Three potential donation scenarios—BD, uncontrolled DCD and controlled DCD—were presented to study subjects during individual face-to-face interviews. Our study has two main findings: (1) In the context of organ procurement, HPs believe that BD is a more reliable standard for determining death than circulatory death, and (2) While the vast majority of HPs consider it morally acceptable to retrieve organs from brain-dead donors, retrieving organs from DCD patients is much more controversial. We offer the following possible explanations. DCD introduces new conditions that deviate from standard medical practice, allow procurement of organs when donors’ loss of circulatory function could be reversed, and raises questions about “death” as a unified concept. Our results suggest that, for many HPs, these concerns seem related in part to the fact that a rigorous brain examination is neither clinically performed nor legally required in DCD. Their discomfort could also come from a belief that irreversible loss of circulatory function has not been adequately demonstrated. If DCD protocols are to achieve their full potential for increasing organ supply, the sources of HPs’ discomfort must be further identified and addressed.
KeywordsAttitude to death Tissue and organ procurement Ethics Attitude of health personnel Donation after circulatory death Brain death France Spain United States
- Borry, P., W. Van Reusel, L. Roels, and P. Schotsmans. 2008. Donation after uncontrolled cardiac death (uDCD): A review of the debate from a European perspective. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36(4): 752–759, 610.Google Scholar
- Cabrol, C. 2007. Prélèvements d’organes sur donneur à coeur arrêté. Académie Nationale de Médecine.Google Scholar
- Capron, A.M. 1999. The bifurcated legal standard for determining death: Does it work? In The definition of death: Contemporary controversies, ed. S.J. Youngner, R. Arnold, and R. Schapiro, 117–136. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Capron, A.M., and L.R. Kass. 1972. A statutory definition of the standards for determining human death: An appraisal and a proposal. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121(87): 102–104.Google Scholar
- Council of Europe. 2009. International figures on donation and transplantation—2008. Newsletter Transplant 14(1): 26–29.Google Scholar
- Décret no. 2005-949 du 2 août .2005. Relatif aux conditions de prélèvement des organes, des tissus et des cellules et modifiant le livre II de la première partie du code de la santé publique (dispositions réglementaires), art. R1232-1. Journal Officiel de la République Française, 6 août 2005.Google Scholar
- Doig, C.J., and D.A. Zygun. 2008. (Uncontrolled) donation after cardiac determination of death: A note of caution. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36(4): 760–765, 610.Google Scholar
- Institute of Medicine. 1999. Non-heart-beating transplantation II: The scientific and ethical basis for practice and protocols. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Institute of Medicine. 2006. Opportunities for action. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Marquis, D. 2010. Are DCD donors dead? Hastings Center Report 40(3): 24–31.Google Scholar
- Matesanz, R. 1996. Documento de consenso español sobre extracción de órganos de donantes en asistolia. Nefrologia XVI(suppl. 2): 48–53.Google Scholar
- McMahan, J. 2006. An alternative to brain death. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34(1): 44–48, 43.Google Scholar
- President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1981. Defining death: Medical, legal and ethical issues in the determination of death. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Shewmon, A.D., and E.S. Shewmon. 2004. The semiotics of death and its medical implications. In Brain death and disorders of consciousness. Proceedings of the IV international symposium on coma and death, held March 9–12, 2004, in Havana, Cuba, eds. C. Machado, and A.D. Shewmon, 89–114. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
- UNOS. 2007. Annual report, OPTN data. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov. Accessed 28 Nov 2011.
- UNOS. 2008. Annual report, OPTN data. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov. Accessed 28 Nov 2011.
- Veatch, R.M. 1989. Death, dying and the biological revolution. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Wagner, H., C.J. Terkelsen, H. Friberg, J. Harnek, K. Kern, J.F. Lassen, et al. 2010. Cardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory: A 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts. Resuscitation 81(4): 383–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar