Survey on the experience in ethical decision-making and attitude of Pleven University Hospital physicians towards ethics consultation
Contemporary medical practice is complicated by many dilemmas requiring ethical sensitivity and moral reasoning.
To investigate physicians’ experience in ethical decision-making and their attitude towards ethics consultation.
In a cross-sectional survey 126 physicians representing the main clinics of Pleven University hospital were investigated by a self-administered questionnaire. The following variables were measured: occurrence, nature and ways of resolving ethical problems; physicians’ attitudes towards ethics consultation; physicians’ opinions on qualities and skills of an ethics consultant, and socio-demographic characteristics. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, χ2 and t-test.
Response rate was 88.9% (n = 112). Men and women were equally represented (48.2%–51.8%). The sample consisted of experienced physicians: 42.9% had 11–20 years experience, and 33% had 21–30 years. According to 84.8% of respondents, ethical problems have been discussed in their specialty. Predominant dilemmas included relationships with patients and relatives (76.8%) and team work (67.6%). Over ¾ of physicians needed an advice in solving ethical problems. Ninety six percent responded positively to ethics consultation. They would mainly request it for resolving conflicts (72.5%), and in case of concern for the rightness of their decisions (52.7%). The image of an ethics consultant was built of clinical competence (70.9%), ability to deal with conflicts (59.1%), communication skills (58.2%), tolerance for different views (55.4%), and a special qualification in ethics (52.7%).
The study underlined that Pleven University hospital physicians face similar ethical dilemmas as their colleagues in other countries do. The expressed positive attitudes to ethics consultation should serve as a basis for further research and development of ethics consultation services.
Keywordscross-sectional survey ethical decision-making ethical problems ethics consultant ethics consultation physicians’ attitudes university hospital
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ausilio M.P., R.M. Arnold, S.J. Youngner (2000) Health Care Ethics Consultation: Nature, Goals, and Competencies. A Position Paper Form The Society for Health and Human Values – Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. Annals of Internal Medicine 133, 59–69Google Scholar
- Beck, S., A. van de Loo and S. Reiter-Theil: 2008, ‹A “Little Bit Illegal”? Withholding and Withdrawing of Mechanical Ventilation in the Eyes of German Intensive Care Physicians’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11Google Scholar
- DuVal G., L. Sartorius, B. Clarridge, G. Gensler, M. Danis: (2001) What Triggers Requests for Ethics Consultations? Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (supplement I), 124–129Google Scholar
- Foerde, R., R. Pedersen and V. Akre: 2008, ‹Clinicians’ Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Consultation in Norway: A␣Qualitative Study’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11Google Scholar
- Hoffman D., A. Tarzian, J.A. O’Neil: (2000) Are Ethics Committee Members Competent to Consult? A Journal of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 28(1), 1073–1105Google Scholar
- Reiter-Theil S. (2001) The Freiburg Approach to Ethics Consultation: Process, Outcome and Competencies. Journal of Medical Ethics 27(supplement I), 121–123Google Scholar
- Slowther A., C. Bunch, B. Woolnough, T. Hope (2001) Clinical Ethics Support Service in the Uk: An Investigation of the Current Provision of Ethics Support to Health Professionals in the UK. Journal of Medical Ethics 27(supplement I), 12–18Google Scholar
- Ten Have H.:2001, Theoretical Models and Approaches to Ethics, in: H. Ten Have, B. Gordijn (eds.), Bioethics in a European Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands pp. 52–54Google Scholar