Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 7–16 | Cite as

A “little bit illegal”? Withholding and withdrawing of mechanical ventilation in the eyes of German intensive care physicians

  • Sabine Beck
  • Andreas van de Loo
  • Stella Reiter-Theil
Scientific Contribution

Abstract

Research questions and background

This study explores a highly controversial issue of medical care in Germany: the decision to withhold or withdraw mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients. It analyzes difficulties in making these decisions and the physicians’ uncertainty in understanding the German terminology of Sterbehilfe, which is used in the context of treatment limitation. Used in everyday language, the word Sterbehilfe carries connotations such as helping the patient in the dying process or helping the patient to enter the dying process. Yet, in the legal and ethical discourse Sterbehilfe indicates several concepts: (1) treatment limitation, i.e., withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (passive Sterbehilfe), (2) the use of medication for symptom control while taking into account the risk of hastening the patient’s death (indirekte Sterbehilfe), and (3) measures to deliberately terminate the patient’s life (aktive Sterbehilfe). The terminology of Sterbehilfe has been criticized for being too complex and misleading, particularly for practical purposes. Materials and methods An exploratory study based on qualitative interviews was conducted with 28 physicians from nine medical intensive care units in tertiary care hospitals in the German federal state of Baden-Wuerttemberg. The method of data collection was a problem-centered, semi-structured interview using two authentic clinical case examples. In order to shed light on the relation between the physicians’ concepts and the ethical and legal frames of reference, we analyzed their way of using the terms passive and aktive Sterbehilfe. Results Generally, the physicians were more hesitant in making decisions to withdraw rather than withhold mechanical ventilation. Almost half of them assumed a categorical prohibition to withdraw any mechanical ventilation and more than one third felt that treatment ought not to be withdrawn at all. Physicians showed specific uncertainty about classifying the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation as passive Sterbehilfe, and had difficulties understanding that terminating ventilation is not basically illegal, but the permissibility of withdrawal depends on the situation. Conclusions The physicians’ knowledge and skills in interpreting clinical ethical dilemmas require specific improvement on the one hand; on the other hand, the terms passive and aktive Sterbehilfe are less clear than desirable and not as easy to use in clinical practice. Fear of making unjustified or illegal decisions may motivate physicians to continue (even futile) treatment. Physicians strongly opt for more open discussion about end-of-life care to allow for discontinuation of futile treatment and to reduce conflict.

Keywords

end-of-life decision-making mechanical ventilation medical intensive care withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albrecht D.: 2003, Strafrechtliche Aspekte der aerztlich vorgenommenen Therapiebegrenzung. In: K. Amelung et al. (eds.), Strafrecht, Biorecht, Rechtsphilosophie. Festschrift fuer Hans-Ludwig Schreiber. Heidelberg: C.F. Mueller Verlag, pp 551–581Google Scholar
  2. Amelung K. et al. (eds.): 2003, Strafrecht, Biorecht, Rechtsphilosophie. Festschrift fuer Hans-Ludwig Schreiber. Heidelberg: C.F. Mueller VerlagGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartels, S., M. Parker, T. Hope and S. Reiter-Theil: 2005, ‹Geben “Richtlinien” bei kritischen Therapieentscheidungen ethische Orientierung? Eine vergleichende kasuistische Analyse der Deutschen Grundsaetze, Britischen Guidelines und Schweizerischen Richtlinien zur Sterbebegleitung’, Ethik in der Medizin 17 (3), 191–205. Online: http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00481/index. htm
  4. Bundesaerztekammer: 2004, Grundsaetze zur aerztlichen Sterbebegleitung. Deutsches Aerzteblatt 94, A1298–A1299Google Scholar
  5. Caralis P.V., J.S. Hammond: 1992, Attitudes of Medical Students, House Staff and Faculty Physicians Toward Euthanasia and Termination of Life-sustaining Treatment. Critical Care Medicine 20, 683–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandros H.S., Taylor H.A., N. Kass: 2001, Qualitative Methods. In: Sugarman J., D.P. Sulmasy (eds.), Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, p. 146Google Scholar
  7. Csef H., B. Heind: 1998, Einstellungen zur Sterbehilfe bei deutschen Aerzten. Eine repraesentative Umfrage im Aerztlichen Kreisverband Wuerzburg. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift 123, 1501–1506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuttini M., Nadai M., Kaminski, M., et al.: 2000, End-of-life Decisions in Neonatal Intensive Care: Physicians’ Self-reported Practices in Seven European Countries, EURONIC Study Group. Lancet 355, 2112–2118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin: 2000 Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft fuer Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin. Anaesthesist 48, 213–217Google Scholar
  10. Faber-Langendoen K., D.M. Bartels: 1992, Process of Foregoing Life-sustaining Treatment in a University Hospital: An Empirical Study. Critical Care Medicine 20, 570–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrand E., Robert R., Ingrand P., et al.: 2001, Withholding and Withdrawal of Life Support in Intensive Care in France: A Prospective Study. Lancet 357, 9–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gesang B.: 2001, Aktive und passive Sterbehilfe – Zur Rehabilitation einer stark kritisierten deskriptiven Unterscheidung. Ethik in der Medizin 13, 161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hinkka H., Kosunen E., Metsenoja R., Lammi U.K., et al.: 2006, Factors Affecting Physicians’ Decisions to Forgo Life-sustaining Treatment in Terminal Care. Journal of Medical Ethics 28, 109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hurst S., Perrier A., Pegoraro R., Reiter-Theil S., et al.: 2006, European Physicians’ Experience with Ethical Difficulties in Clinical Practice. Journal of Medical Ethics 33, 51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayring P.: 1993, Einfuehrung in die qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken (2. erw. Auflage). Muenchen: Psychologie Verlags UnionGoogle Scholar
  16. Meltzer L.S., L.M. Huckabay: 2004, Critical Care Nurses’ Perceptions of Futile Care and its Effect on Burnout. American Journal of Critical Care 13(3), 202–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Prendergast T.J., M.T. Claessens, J.M. Luce: 1998, National Survey of End-of-life Care for Critically Ill Patients. American Journal of Critical Care Medicine 158, 1163–1167Google Scholar
  18. Quante M.: 1998, Passive, indirekt und direkt aktive Sterbehilfe – deskriptiv und ethisch tragfaehige Unterscheidungen?. Ethik in der Medizin 10, 206–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reiter-Theil S.: 2001, Ethics Consultation in Germany. The Present Situation. Health Ethics Committee Forum 13(3), 265–280Google Scholar
  20. Reiter-Theil S.: 2003a, Ethics of End-of-life Decisions in the Elderly. Deliberations from the ECOPE Study. Ballière’s Best Practice & Research. Clinical Anaesthesiology 17(2), 273–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Reiter-Theil S.: 2003b, Balancing the Perspectives. The Patient’s Role in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, A European Journal 6, 247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reiter-Theil S.: 2004, Does Empirical Research Make Bioethics More Relevant? “The Embedded Researcher” as a Methodological Approach. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, A European Journal 7, 7–29Google Scholar
  23. Reiter-Theil S.: 2005, Klinische Ethikkonsultation – eine methodische Orientierung zur ethischen Beratung am Krankenbett. Schweizerische Aerztezeitung 86(6), 346–351Google Scholar
  24. Reiter-Theil S., S. Traebert, D. Lange, W. Hiddemann: 2003, Sterben und Sterbehilfe: Problemwahrnehmung von Aerzten und Pflegenden in der Onkologie. Ergebnisse einer Interviewstudie. Der Onkologe 9, 153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reiter-Theil S., R. Hentschel, K. Lindner K.: 2005, Lebenserhaltung und Sterbebegleitung in der Neonatologie. Eine empirische Ethik-Studie zu kritischen Therapieentscheidungen. Zeitschrift fuer Palliativmedizin 6, 11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schildmann J., Herrmann E., Burchardi N., Schwantes U., et al.: 2004, Sterbehilfe. Kenntnisse und Einstellungen Berliner Medizinstudierender. Ethik in der Medizin 16, 123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schneiderman L.J., Gilmer T., Teetzel H.D., Dugan D.O., et al.: 2003, Effects of Ethics Consultations on Non beneficial Life-sustaining Treatments in the Intensive Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Jama 290(9), 1166–1172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schroeder C., G. Schmutzer, A. Klaiberg, E. Braehler: 2003, Aerztliche Sterbehilfe im Spannungsfeld zwischen Zustimmung zur Freigabe und persoenlicher Inanspruchnahme - Ergebnisse einer repraesentativen Befragung der deutschen Beoevlkerung. Psychotheraphy & Psychology Medicine 53, 334–343Google Scholar
  29. Sprung C.L., L.A. Eidelmann: 1996, Worldwide similarities and differences in the forgoing of life-sustaining treatments. Intensive Care Medicine 22, 1003–1005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stratenwerth G.: 2003, Zum Behandlungsabbruch bei zerebral schwerst geschaedigten Langzeitpatienten. in: Amelung K. et al. (eds.), Strafrecht, Biorecht, Rechtsphilosophie. Festschrift fuer Hans-Ludwig Schreiber. Heidelberg: C.F. Mueller Verlag, pp. 893–901Google Scholar
  31. Sulmasy D.: 2001, Research in Medical Ethics: Physician Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia. Qualitative Methods. In: Sugarman J., D.P. Sulmasy (eds.), Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, (p. 247)Google Scholar
  32. Troehler, U. and S. Reiter-Theil: 1998 (eds. in collaboration with E. Herych), Ethics Codes in Medicine: Foundations and Achievements 1947 – 1997. Aldershot: AshgateGoogle Scholar
  33. Ulsenheimer K.: 2001, Aktive und passive Sterbehilfe aus der Sicht der Rechtssprechung. Internist 41, 648–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van der Heide, A., L. Dellens, K. Faisst, T. Nilstun, et al.: 2003, ’End-of-life Decision-making in Six European Countries: Descriptive Study’, Lancet 361, 345–350. Online: http://www.thelancet.com
  35. Weber M., Stiehl M., Reiter J., et al.: 1998, Sorgsames Abwaegen der jeweiligen Situation. Ergebnisse einer Aerztebefragung in Rheinland-Pfalz. Deutsches Aerzteblatt 48, B2697–B2701Google Scholar
  36. Wolfslast G.: 2003, Rechtliche Neuordnung der Toetung auf Verlangen? In: Amelung K. et al. (eds.), Strafrecht, Biorecht, Rechtsphilosophie. Festschrift fuer Hans-Ludwig Schreiber. Heidelberg: C.F. Mueller Verlag, pp. 913–927Google Scholar
  37. Wood G.G., E. Martin: 1995, ‹Withholding and Withdrawing Life-sustaining Therapy in a Canadian Intensive Care Unit. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 42(3), 186–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wuensch A., Lange D., Bengel J., Hiddemann W., S. Reiter-Theil: 2001, Aerztliche Sterbebegleitung und passive Sterbehilfe. Eine empirische Studie zu ethischen, medizinischen und psychologischen Problemen. Zeitschrift fuer Palliativmedizin 2, 20–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabine Beck
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andreas van de Loo
    • 3
  • Stella Reiter-Theil
    • 4
  1. 1.Private PracticeBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Applied Ethics and Medical EthicsUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  3. 3.Center for Internal Medicine/CardiologyMarienkrankenhaus, HamburgGermany
  4. 4.Institute for Applied Ethics and Medical Ethics (IAEME), Medical FacultyUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations