Advertisement

Medical humanities: stranger at the gate, or long-lost friend?

  • H. M. EvansEmail author
Scientific Contribution

Abstract

“Medical humanities” is a phrase whose currency is wider than its agreed meaning or denotation. What sort of study is it, and what is its relation to the study of philosophy of medicine? This paper briefly reviews the origins of the current flowering of interest and activity in studies that are collectively called “medical humanities” and presents an account of its nature and central enquiries in which philosophical questions are unashamedly central. In the process this paper argues that the field of enquiry is well-conceived as being philosophical in character, and as having philosophy — albeit pursued over a larger canvas — at the core of its contributing humanities disciplines. The paper characterises humanities disciplines as having an important focus on human experience and subjectivity, of which the experiences and subjectivities at stake in health, medicine and illness form an important sub-set, the preoccupation of the medical humanities as a whole. Claims of interdisciplinarity (as distinct from multidisciplinarity) are noted, but such claims need to be recognised for the high and stern ambition that they embody, and should not be made lightly.

Keywords

humanities interdisciplinarity medical humanities philosophy of medicine subjectivity 

References

  1. Bolton G.: 2001, Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development, London: Paul ChapmanGoogle Scholar
  2. Cassell E.: 1991, The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Evans M.: 2002a, Medicine, Philosophy and the Medical Humanities, British Journal of General Practice 52(479), 447–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Evans M.: 2002b, Reflections on the Humanities in Medical Education, Medical Education 36(6), 508–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans M.: 2003, Roles for Literature in Medical Education, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 9, 380–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans H.M.: 2007, Medical Humanities: An Overview, in: R. Ashcroft, H. Draper, A. Dawson, J. MacMillan (eds.), Principles of Health Care Ethics (2nd edition), Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 199–206Google Scholar
  7. Evans H.M., R.J. Macnaughton: 2004, Should Medical Humanities be a Multidisciplinary or an Interdisciplinary Study? Journal of Medical Ethics: Medical Humanities 30(1), 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greaves D.: 2001, The Nature and Role of the Medical Humanities, in: M. Evans, I. Finlay (eds.), Medical Humanities, London: BMJ Books, pp. 1–22Google Scholar
  9. Haddon M.: 2002, The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time. London: Jonathan CapeGoogle Scholar
  10. Hampshire S.: 1989, Innocence and Experience, Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Hampshire A.J., A.J. Avery: 2001, What can Students Learn from Studying Medicine in Literature? Medical Education 35, 687–690CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hofmann B.: 2001, The Technological Invention of Disease, Journal of Medical Ethics: Medical Humanities 27(1), 10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holm S.: 2000, Changes to Bodily Appearance: The Aesthetics of Deliberate Intervention, Journal of Medical Ethics: Medical Humanities 26(1), 43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunter K.M., R. Charon, J.L. Coulehan 1995, Study of Literature in Medical Education, Academic Medicine 70(9), 787–794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirklin, D. and R. Richardson (eds.): 2001, Medical Humanities: A Practical Introduction. London: Royal College of PhysiciansGoogle Scholar
  16. Macnaughton J.: 2001, Why Medical Humanities Now?, in: M. Evans, I. Finlay (eds.), Medical Humanities, London: BMJ Books, pp. 187–203Google Scholar
  17. Robson, M. and M. White: 2003, ‘Ice to Fire’ Mailout, June 2003Google Scholar
  18. Sacks O.: 1986, A Leg to Stand on. London: Pan BooksGoogle Scholar
  19. Sweeney K.: 1996, How can Evidence-Based Medicine Help Patients in General Practice? Family Practice 13, 489–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Toulmin S.: 1993, Knowledge and Art in the Practice of Medicine: Clinical Judgement and Historical Reconstruction. in: C. Delkeskamp-Hayes, M.A. Gardell Cutter (eds.), Science, Technology and the Art of Medicine, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers pp. 231–249Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Arts and Humanities in Health and MedicineDurham UniversityDurhamUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations