‘Freud Said – or Simon Says? Informed consent and the advancement of psychoanalysis as a science’ Abstract
Is it ever permissible to publish a patient’s confidences without permission? I investigate this question for the field of psychoanalysis. Whereas most medical fields adopted a 1995 recommendation for consent requirements, psychoanalysis continues to defend the traditional practice of nonconsensual publication. Both the hermeneutic and the scientific branches of the field justify the practice, arguing that it provides data needed to help future patients, and both branches advance generalizations and causal claims. However the hermeneutic branch embraces methods tending to undermine the reliability of such claims, while the scientific branch aims to improve the field’s empirical base – in their words, to advance psychoanalysis as a science. The scientific branch therefore has the stronger claim to the traditional practice, and it their claim that I consider. An immediate concern arises. We seem unable to answer the applied ethical question without first determining which ethical theory is correct; for defenders of the practice appeal variously to therapeutic privilege, principlism, and utilitarianism, while opponents wage autonomy-based arguments. The concern turns out to be unfounded, however, because all of these ethical approaches fail to justify the traditional practice. The more promising defenses fail partly because even the scientific branch of the field lacks empirically sound methods for establishing its causal claims and generalizations, often appealing to authority instead. I conclude that it is currently unethical for analysts to continue publishing their patients’ confidences without permission, and I suggest that the field help future patients by attending to its methodological problems.
Keywords autonomy case report confidentiality human subject research informed consent nonconsensual publication psychoanalysis science References Bachrach, H.M., Galatzer-Levy, R., Skolnikoff, A., Waldron, S., Jr. 1991 ‘On the Efficacy of Psychoanalysis’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 39 871 916 PubMed Google Scholar
Barlow, D. and M. Herson: 1984,
Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change
(2nd ed). Pergamon Press
Google Scholar Beahrs, J.O., Gunheil, T.G. 2000 ‘Informed Consent in Psychotherapy’ American Journal of Psychiatry 158 4 10 CrossRef Google Scholar Beauchamp, T., Childress, J. 2001Principles of Biomedical Ethics5 Oxford University Press New York, NY Google Scholar Blatt, S.J., Shahar, G. 2004 ‘Psychoanalysis – With Whom, for What, and How? Comparisons with Psychotherapy’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 52 393 447 PubMed Google Scholar Blomberg, J., Lazar, A., Sandell, R. 2001 ‘Long-Term Outcome of Long-Term Psychoanalytically Oriented Therapies: First Findings of the Stockholm Outcome of Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis Study’ Psychotherapy Research 11 361 382 CrossRef Google Scholar
British Journal of Psychiatry
, Instructions for Authors
Canterbury v. Spence
: 1972. U.S. Court of Appeals.
, 2nd series, Vol. 464
Google Scholar Clever, L.H. 1997 ‘Obtain Informed Consent Before Publishing Information About Patients’ JAMA 278 628 629 PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Coen, S.J. 2000a ‘Why We Need to Write Openly About our Clinical Cases’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48 449 469 Google Scholar Coen, S.J. 2000b ‘Clinical Discussants as Psychoanalytic Readers’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48 471 495 Google Scholar Coulter, A. 1999 ‘Paternalism or Partnership?’ British Medical Journal 319 719 720 PubMed Google Scholar Dahl, H. 1974 ‘The Measurement of Meaning in Psychoanalysis by Computer Analysis of Verbal Contexts’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 22 37 57 PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
Doe v. Roe
: 1977. LEXSEE 400 NY S 2D 668, Jane Doe, Plaintiff, v. Joan Roe et al., Defendants, Supreme Court of New York, New York County; 93 Misc. 2d 201; 400 N.Y.S.2d 668.
Freud S.: 1905, ‘Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria’, in: J. Strachey (ed.),
The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud
,Vol. 7, London: Hogarth Press, 1953, pp. 1–122
Google Scholar Furlong, A. 1998 ‘Should We or Shouldn’t We? Some Aspects of the Confidentiality of Clinical Reporting and Dossier Access’ International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 79 727 739 PubMed Google Scholar Gabbard, G., Gunderson, J., Fonagy, P. 2002 ‘The place of psychoanalytic treatments within psychiatry’ Arch Gen Psychiatry 59 505 510 PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Gabbard, G. 2000 ‘Disguise or Consent: Problems and Recommendations Concerning the Publication and Presentation of Clinical Material’ International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 81 1071 1086 PubMed Google Scholar Galatzer-Levy, R. 2003 ‘Psychoanalytic Research and Confidentiality: Dilemmas’ Levin, C. Furlong, A. eds. Confidentiality: Ethical Perspectives and Clinical Dilemmas Analytic Press, Inc. Hillsdale, NJ, US 86 106 Google Scholar Goldberg, A. 1997a ‘Writing Case Histories’ International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 78 435 438 Google Scholar Goldberg, A. 1997b ‘Response’ International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 78 821 Google Scholar Gross, B.H. 2001 ‘Informed consent’ Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association 4 24 Google Scholar Grünbaum, A. 2001 ‘Critique of Freud’s Notion of Mental Illness’ Tymieniecka, A-T. eds. Life: Interpretation and the Sense of Illness Within the Human Condition: Medicine and Philosophy in a Dialogue. Analecta Husserliana Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands Google Scholar Grünbaum, A. 1993Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis: A Study in the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Psychological Issues, Monograph 61l International Universities Press, Inc Madison, CT Google Scholar Grünbaum, A. 1984The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique University of California Press Berkeley, CA Google Scholar Halpern, J. 2003 ‘Beyond Wishful Thinking: Facing the Harm that Psychotherapists Can Do by Writing About Their Patients’ The Journal of Clinical Ethics 14 118 136 PubMed Google Scholar Hobson, R.P, Patrick, M.P., Valentine, J.D. 1998 ‘Objectivity in Psychoanalytic Judgements’ British Journal of Psychiatry 173 172 177 PubMed Google Scholar Howe, E.G. 2003 ‘Whither Informed Consent? Lessons from Jay Carter’ The Journal of Clinical Ethics 14 109 117 PubMed Google Scholar International Committee of Medical Journal Editors 1995 ‘Protection of Patients’ Rights to Privacy’ British Medical Journal 311 1272 Google Scholar Kantrowitz, J.L. 2004a ‘Writing About Patients: I. Ways of Protecting Confidentiality and Analysts Conflicts over Choice of Method’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 52 69 99 Google Scholar Kantrowitz, J.L. 2004b ‘Writing About Patients: II. Patients’ Reading About Themselves and their Analysts’ Perceptions of its Effect’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 52 101 123 Google Scholar Klumpner, G.H., Frank, Al 1991 ‘On Methods of Reporting Clinical Material’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 39 537 551 PubMed Google Scholar Lear, J. 2003 ‘Confidentiality as a Virtue’ Levin, C. Furlong, A. eds. Confidentiality: Ethical Perspectives and Clinical Dilemmas Analytic Press, Inc Hillsdale, NJ, US 3 17 Google Scholar Levine, S.B., Stagno, S.J. 2001 ‘Informed consent for case reports: The ethical dilemma of right to privacy versus pedagogical freedom’ Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research 10 193 201 PubMed Google Scholar Lipton, E.L. 1991 ‘The Analyst’s Use of Clinical Data and Other Issues of Confidentiality’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 39 967 985 PubMed Google Scholar Luborsky, L., Luborsky, E. 1995 ‘The Era of Measures of Transference: the CCRT and Other Measures’ Shapiro, T. Emde, R.N. eds. Research in Psychoanalysis: Process, Development, Outcome International Universities Press Madison, CT 329 351 Google Scholar Michels, R. 2000a ‘The Case History’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48 355 375 Google Scholar Michels, R. 2000b ‘Response to Commentaries on ‘The Case History’’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48 417 420 Google Scholar
Nuremberg Code: 1949. ‘Reprinted’, in: Robert J. Levine (ed.),
Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research
, Baltimore, MD: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1981, pp. 285–286
Google Scholar Person, E.S. 1983 ‘Women in Therapy’ International Review of Psychoanalysis 10 193 204 Google Scholar Reiser, L.W. 2000 ‘The Write Stuff’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48 351 354 PubMed Google Scholar Renik, O. 1994 ‘Presentation of Clinical Facts’ International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 75 1245 1250 PubMed Google Scholar Rudner, R. 1953 ‘The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments’ Philosophy of Science 20 1 6 CrossRef Google Scholar Scharff, J.S. 2000 ‘On Writing from Clinical Experience’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48 421 447 PubMed Google Scholar Siegel, P., Josephs, L., Weinberger, J. 2002 ‘Where’s the Text? The Problem of Validation in Psychoanalysis’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 50 407 428 PubMed Google Scholar Smith, R. 1995 ‘Publishing Information About Patients: Time to Change from Guarding Anonymity to Getting Consent’ British Medical Journal 311 1240 1241 PubMed Google Scholar Stoller, R.J. 1988 ‘Patients’ Responses to Their Own Case Reports’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 36 371 391 PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Target, M., Fonagy, P. 1994a ‘Efficacy of Psychoanalysis for Children with Emotional Disorders’ Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 33 361 371 Google Scholar Target, M., Fonagy, P. 1994b ‘The Efficacy of Psychoanalysis for Children: Prediction of Outcome in a Developmental Context’ Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 33 1134 1144 Google Scholar Tuckett, D. 1998 ‘Evaluating Psychoanalytic Papers: Towards the Development of Common Standards’ International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 79 431 448 PubMed Google Scholar Tuckett, D. 2000a ‘Commentary on ‘The Case History’ by Robert Michels’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48 403 411 Google Scholar Tuckett, D. 2000b ‘Editorial Reporting Clinical Events in the Journal: Towards the Construction of a Special Case’ International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 81 1065 1069 Google Scholar Tuckett, D. 1994 ‘The Conceptualization and Communication of Clinical Facts in Psychoanalysis’ International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 75 865 870 PubMed Google Scholar Ver Eecke, W. 2003 ‘The Role of Psychoanalytic Theory and Practice in Understanding and Treating Schizophrenia: A Rejoinder to the PORT Report’s Condemnation of Psychoanalysis’ Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry 31 11 29 PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Vollmann, J., Helmchen, H. 1996 ‘Publishing Information about Patients: Obtaining Consent May be Unethical in some Cases’ British Medical Journal 312 578 PubMed Google Scholar Warnock, M. 1998 ‘Informed Consent – A Publisher’s Duty’ British Medical Journal 316 1002 PubMed Google Scholar Widlocher, D. 1994 ‘A Case is Not a Fact’ International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 75 1233 1244 PubMed Google Scholar Wilkinson, G., Fahy, T., Russell, G., Healy, D., Marks, I., Tantam, D., Dimond, B. 1995 ‘Case Reports and Confidentiality’ British Journal of Psychiatry 166 555 558 PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Recommendations Guiding Medical Doctors in Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, revised 1975. Reprinted in Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research, Robert J. Levine. Baltimore, MD: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1981, pp. 287–289