Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 307–313 | Cite as

Children, Longitudinal Studies, and Informed Consent

  • Gert Helgesson
Scientific Contribution


This paper deals with ethical issues of particular relevance to longitudinal research involving children. First some general problems concerning information and lack of understanding are discussed. Thereafter focus is shifted to issues concerning information and consent procedures in studies that include young children growing up to become autonomous persons while the project still runs. Some of the questions raised are: When is it right to include children in longitudinal studies? Is an approval from the child needed? How should information to children be handled? A general point stressed is that autonomy considerations underline the importance of adjusting the information given to meet demands. A “presumption of competence” may be needed in research involving children, in order to pay their views sufficient attention.


autonomy children informed consent longitudinal studies understanding 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alderson, P. 2000Young Children’s Rights. Exploring Beliefs. Principles and PracticeJessica Kingsley PublishersLondon & PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderson, P., Montgomery, J. 1996Health Care Choices. Making Decisions with ChildrenIPPRLondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauchamp, T., Childress, J. 2001Principles of Biomedical Ethics5Oxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Brock, D. 1993Life and Death: Philosophical Essays in Biomedical EthicsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Brody, B.A. 1998The Ethics of Biomedical Research: An International PerspectiveOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke, S. 2001‘Informed Consent in Medicine in Comparison with Consent in Other Areas of Human Activity’The Southern Journal of Philosophy39169187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke, A., Flinter, F. 1999‘The Genetic Testing of Children: A Clinical Perspective’Marteau, T.Richards, M. eds. The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human GeneticsCambridge University PressCambridge164176Google Scholar
  8. Council of Europe: 1997, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Oviedo.Google Scholar
  9. Council of Europe: 1996, European Convention on the Exercise of Children’s Rights. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, R., Alldred, P. 1999‘Children and Young People’s Views of Social Research. The Case of Research on Home–School Relations’Childhood6261281Google Scholar
  11. Faden, R., Beauchamp, T. 1986A History of Informed ConsentOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman Ross, L. 2003‘The Ethics of Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention Research’Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics24177197Google Scholar
  13. Golding, J., M. Pembrey, R. Jones and the ALSPAC Study Team: 2001, ‘ALSPAC – The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children 1. Study Methodology, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 15, 74–87.Google Scholar
  14. Goodenough, T., Williamson, E., Kent, J., Ashcroft, R. 2003‘ “What Did You Think about That?” Researching Children’s Perceptions of Participation in a Longitudinal Genetic Epidemiological Study’Children & Society17113125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gustafsson-Stolt U.: 2003, Aspects in Bioethics. Theory and Practice in a Preventive Screening for Type 1 Diabetes. Diss. Linköping University.Google Scholar
  16. Harper, P.S., Clarke, A.J. 1987Genetics, Society and Clinical PracticeBIOS Scientific PublishersOxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoeyer, K. 2003‘“Science is Really Needed – That’s All I Know”: Informed Consent and the Non-Verbal Practices of Collecting Blood for Genetic Research in Northern Sweden’New Genetics and Society22229244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lag (2003:460) om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor (Swedish Act on Ethical Review): 2003.Google Scholar
  19. Laurie, G. 2002Genetic Privacy. A Challenge to Medico-Legal NormsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Leikin, S. 1996‘Ethical Issues in Epidemiologic Research with Children’Coughlin, S.Beauchamp, T. eds. Ethics and EpidemiologyOxford University PressOxford199218Google Scholar
  21. Morrow, V., Richards, M. 1996‘The Ethics of Social Research with Children: An Overview’Children & Society1090105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller, R.B. 2003Children, Ethics, and Modern MedicineIndiana University PressBloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Nicholson, R.H. eds. 1986Medical Research with Children: Ethics, Law, and PracticeOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Ondrusek, N., Abramovitch, R., Pencharz, P., Koren, G. 1998‘Empirical Examination of the Ability of Children to Consent to Clinical Research’Journal of Medical Ethics24158165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Neill, O. 2003‘Some Limits of Informed Consent’Journal of Medical Ethics2947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Neill, O. 2002Autonomy and Trust in BioethicsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Rossi, W., Reynolds, W., Nelson, R. 2003‘Child Assent and Parental Permission in Pediatric Research’Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics24131148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Stafford, A., Laybourn, A., Hill, M., Walker, M. 2003‘“Having a Say”: Children and Young People Talk about Consultation’Children & Society17361373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swedish Medical Research Council: 2000, Riktlinjer för etisk värdering av medicinsk humanforskning(Guideline for Ethical Evaluation of Medical Research Involving Human Subjects) (revised ed). Stockholm.Google Scholar
  30. U.N.: 1989, Convention on the Rights of the Child.Google Scholar
  31. Wendler, D., Shah, S. 2003‘Should Children Decide Whether They Are Enrolled in Nonbeneficial Research?’American Journal of Bioethics317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wolpe, P. 1998‘The Triumph of Autonomy in American Bioethics: A Sociological View’DeVries, R.Subedi, J. eds. Bioethics and Society: Constructing the Ethical EnterprisePrentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs, N.J.3859Google Scholar
  33. World Medical Association: 2000, Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Adopted by the 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Health and Caring SciencesCentre for Bioethics at Karolinska Institutet and Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations