Measurement Techniques

, Volume 62, Issue 7, pp 629–635 | Cite as

The Use of Projection Methods of Multivariate Analysis in Eddy Current Thickness Measurement

  • A. V. EgorovEmail author
  • V. V. Polyakov
  • Ya. I. Bortsova

Multifrequency eddy current measurements of the thickness of non-magnetic metallic materials with dielectric coatings have been carried out. Based on the principal component analysis, the influence of competing factors such as electrical conductivity, thickness of the metal substrate and thickness of the dielectric layer is separated. Using the projection method on latent structures, eddy current measurements have determined the numerical values of the thicknesses of aluminum and copper plates and dielectric coatings.


eddy current method thickness gauge multivariate analysis principal component method 


  1. 1.
    V. V. Klyuev, F. R. Sosnin, A. V. Kovalev (eds.), Non-Destructive Testing and Diagnostics: Handbook, Mashinostroenie, Moscow (2003).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. E. Shubochkin, Development and Current State of the Eddy-Current Method of Non-Destructive Testing, Spectr (2014).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. S. Golubev, N. I. Smirnova, and M. I. Skladanovskaya, “Ensuring the integrity of thickness measurements of metal coatings using eddy current phase thickness gauges during their calibration and certification,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 6, 25–28 (2017).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. V. Dyakin and V. A. Sandovsky, Theory and Calculation of Overhead Eddy Current Converters, Nauka, Moscow (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Garcia-Martin, J. Gomez-Gil, and E. Vazquez-Sanchez, “Non-destructive techniques based on eddy current testing,” Sensors (Basel), 11, No. 3, 2525–2565 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lulu Tian, Yuhua Cheng, Chun Yin, et al., “Data-driven method for the measurement of thickness/depth using pulsed eddy current,” Sens. & Mater., 29, No. 9, 1325–1338 (2017).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. A. Kudryavtsev, S. A. Gudkov, and N. V. Selivanov, “Device eddy current control of the purity of a working fl uid,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 2, 51–54 (2018).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. C. Yang and C. C. Tai, “Pulsed eddy-current measurement of a conducting coating on a magnetic metal plate,” Measur. Sci. Technol., 13, 1259–1265 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. V. Egorov, V. V. Polyakov, A. A. Lependin, and Y. I. Gracheva, “The use of signals of a special form in multi-frequency eddy current measurements,” Avtometriya, 53, No. 3, 28–35 (2017).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. H. Esbensen and P. Geladi, “Principal component analysis: concept, geometrical interpretation, mathematical background, algorithms, history, practice,” in: Comprehensive Chemometrics, R. Tauler and B. Walczak (eds.), Elsevier, Oxford (2009), pp. 211–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. V. Egorov, and V. V. Polyakov, “Application of the principal component method for eddy current testing of aluminum alloys,” Defectoscopiya, No. 10, 42–48 (2015).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Shokralla, J. E. Morelli, and T. W. Krause, “Principal components analysis of multifrequency eddy current data used to measure pressure tube to calandria tube gap,” IEEE Sens. J., 16, No. 9, 3147–3154 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. V. Egorov, S. V. Kucheryavskiy, and V. V. Polyakov, “Resolution of effects in multi-frequency eddy current data for reliable diagnostics of conductive materials,” Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., 160, 8–12 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. V. Egorov, and V. V. Polyakov, “Application of the principal component method for eddy current testing of metal materials with a dielectric coating,” Izv. Altai. Gos. Univ., No. 4, 33–38 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. V. Egorov, V. V. Polyakov, D. S. Salita, et al., “Inspection of aluminum alloys by a multi-frequency eddy current method,” Defence Technol., 11, 99–103 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Egorov
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. V. Polyakov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ya. I. Bortsova
    • 1
  1. 1.Altai State UniversityBarnaulRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Strength Physics and Materials ScienceSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ISPMS SB RAS)TomskRussia

Personalised recommendations