Measurement Techniques

, Volume 61, Issue 12, pp 1141–1147 | Cite as

A Complex Approach to Assuring the Robustness of Measurement Methods

  • P. S. SerenkovEmail author
  • V. L. Hurevich
  • E. E. Feldshtein

The need for a systems approach to the study of the robustness of techniques of performing measurements is evaluated. A model of losses of robustness of a measurement method by means of which the complete set of external and internal influencing factors may be identified is proposed based on a process model. Factors responsible for losses of robustness of the first and second kind are identified. Algorithms for identification and analysis of loss factors as well as control of these factors, including the application of Taguchi methods, are evaluated A conception of a complex technique of studying a measurement method on the stage of validation is proposed.


robustness measurement methods model of losses of robustness robustness factors of the first and second kind Taguchi methods 


  1. 1.
    WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations, “Validation of Analytic Procedures Used in the Examination of Pharmaceutical Materials: 32nd Report,” WHO Techn. Rep. Ser., No. 823, 117–121 (1992).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eurochem/SITAK Guide, Quantitative Description of Uncertainty in Analytic Measurements [Russian translation], Mendeleev VNIIM, St. Petersburg (2002).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Hampel (ed.), Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1989).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Taguchi, S. Chowdhury, and Sh. Taguchi, Robust Engineering: Learn How to Boost Quality While Reducing Costs & Time to Market, Mcgraw-Hill, London (1999).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISO 5725-5:1998, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of Measurement Methods and Results. Pt. 5: Alternative Methods for the Determination of the Precision of a Standard Measurement Method. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Taguchi, S. Chowdhury, and Y. Wu, Taguchi’s Quality Engineering Handbook (2004),, acc. 10.01.2018.
  7. 7.
    P. S. Serenkov, N. A. Zhagora, V. I. Naydenova, et al., “Compound approach to estimation of uncertainty of a measurement result within the framework of an internal laboratory study of MVI,” Metrol. Priborostr., No. 3, 15–23 (2013).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISO/TS 21748:2010, Guidance for the Use of Repeatability, Reproducibility and Trueness Estimates in Measurement Uncertainty Estimation.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Measurement System Analysis. Reference Manual, Daimler Crysler Corp., Ford Motor Co., General Motors Corp. (2002),, acc. 10.01.2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. S. Serenkov
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. L. Hurevich
    • 2
  • E. E. Feldshtein
    • 3
  1. 1.Belarus National Technical UniversityMinskBelarus
  2. 2.Belarus State Institute of MetrologyMinskBelarus
  3. 3.University of Zielona GóraZielona GóraPoland

Personalised recommendations