Advertisement

Measurement Techniques

, Volume 61, Issue 4, pp 353–359 | Cite as

Methods and Devices for Monitoring the Process of Laser Cleaning of Artworks

  • V. A. Parfenov
OPTOPHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS
  • 2 Downloads

A method of monitoring the process of laser cleaning of monuments and other works of art in the course of conservation is presented. The capabilities of the method of laser-induced breakdown plasma spectroscopy in cleaning of monuments made of metal are considered. A photometric device based on an integrating cavity in the form of a cylinder is developed and investigated. The capabilities gained with the use of the device for proximate analysis of the efficiency of the process of cleaning the surfaces of sculpture made of marble and limestone structures are shown.

Keywords

monitoring methods laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy photodetector integrating sphere laser cleaning artworks conservation 

Notes

The present investigations were performed with the support of the Ministry of Education and Science (State Contract No. 14.740.11.0601 for R&D “Development of Laser Technologies in Conservation of Works of Art”).

References

  1. 1.
    M. Cooper, Laser Cleaning in Conservation: An Introduction, Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford (1998).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Fotakis, D. Anglos, V. Zafiropoulos, et al., Lasers in the Preservation of Cultural Heritage. Principles and Applications, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton (USA) (2007).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. A. Parfenov, Laser Cleaning of Historical and Cultural Monuments, Izd. SPbGETU LETI, St. Petersburg (2015).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. Verges-Belmin and C. Dignard, “Laser yellowing: myth or reality,” J. Cultur. Herit., 4, 238–244 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. A. Parfenov and I. A. Yudin, “Atomic-force microscopy and its use in science, engineering, and conservation,” Izv. SPbGETU LETI, No. 9, 61–70 (2015).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Gora, A. Rycyk, J. Marczak, et al., “From medical to art diagnostics. OCT: a novel tool for varnish ablation control,” SPIE Proc., 6429, 64292V-1 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. A. Grigor’eva, V. A. Parfenov, D. S. Prokuratov, and A. L. Shakhmin, “Laser cleaning of copper in air and nitrogen media,” Opt. Zh., 84, No. 1, 3–8 (2017).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. A. Parfenov, J. Asmus, M. Magde, et al., “Underwater inverse LIBS (iLIBS) for marine archeology,” SPIE Proc., 8790, 8790V-1–8790V-12 (2013).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. M. Gurevich, Photometry. Theory, Methods, and Devices, Energoatomizdat, Leningrad (1983).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Siano, F. Fabiano, R. Pini, et al., “Determination of damage threshold to prevent side effects in laser cleaning of Pliocene sandstone of Siena,” J. Cultur. Herit., 1, No. 1, S47–S53 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Petersburg State Electrical Engineering University (LETI)St. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics, and Optics (ITMO)St. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations