Conscience, tolerance, and pluralism in health care
- 81 Downloads
Increasingly, physicians are being asked to provide technical services that many (in some cases, most) believe are morally wrong or inconsistent with their beliefs about the meaning and purposes of medicine. This controversy has sparked persistent debate over whether practitioners should be permitted to decline participation in a variety of legal practices, most notably physician-assisted suicide and abortion. These debates have become heavily politicized, and some of the key words and phrases are being used without a clear understanding of their meaning. In this essay, I endeavor, firstly, to clarify the meaning of some of these terms: conscience, conscientious action, professional judgment, conscientious objection, conscience clauses, civil disobedience, and tolerance. I argue that use of the term conscientious objection to describe these refusals by health care professionals is mistaken and confusing. Secondly, relying on a proper understanding of the moral and technical character of medical judgment, the optimal deference that the state and markets ought to have toward professions, and general principles of Lockean tolerance for a diversity of practices and persons in a flourishing, pluralistic, democratic society, I offer a defense of tolerance with respect to the deeply held convictions of physicians and other health care professionals who hold minority views on contested but legal medical practices.
KeywordsMedical judgment Conscience Conscientious objection Tolerance Medical practice
- 1.Death Penalty Information Center. 2018. States with and without the death penalty. Death Penalty Information Center, October 11. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/states-and-without-death-penalty. Accessed October 30, 2018.
- 2.American Medical Association. 2016. Code of medical ethics opinion 9.7.3: Capital punishment. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/capital-punishment. Accessed October 30, 2018.
- 4.District of Columbia Death with Dignity Act of 2016, D.C. Law 21–182 (2017).Google Scholar
- 5.Nirappil, Fenit. 2018. A year after D.C. passed its controversial assisted suicide law, not a single patient has used it. Washington Post, April 10. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/a-year-after-dc-passed-its-assisted-suicide-law-only-two-doctors-have-signed-up/2018/04/10/823cf7e2-39ca-11e8-9c0a-85d477d9a226_story.html.
- 10.Johnson, Sara K., Christopher A. Bautista, Seo Yeon Hong, Lisa Weissfeld, and Douglas B. White. 2011. An empirical study of surrogates’ preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 183: 915–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Flexner, Abraham. 1915. Is social work a profession? School and Society 1: 901–911.Google Scholar
- 12.Pellegrino, E.D. 1977. The expansion and contraction of “discretionary space.” In Priorities for the use of resources in medicine, 99–112. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- 13.Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
- 14.Church Amendments, 42 U.S.C. § 300a-7.Google Scholar
- 15.Oregon Death with Dignity Act. ORS 127.800–995.Google Scholar
- 16.Locke, John. 2010. An essay concerning toleration. In A letter concerning toleration and other writings, ed. Mark Goldie, 105–140. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
- 19.Davis, Michael. 2011. Professional codes. In The Sage handbook of healthcare ethics, ed. Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, and Eric M. Meslin, 63–72. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- 20.Sulmasy, Daniel P. 2016. Physician, heal thyself: Doctors in a pluralist democracy. In The professions and civic life, ed. Gary J. Schmitt, 95–111. Lanham: Lexington.Google Scholar
- 21.de Toqueville, Alexis. 2000. Democracy in America. Trans. Harvey C. Mansfield. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- 22.Raven, David. 2016. Man who chopped off own ears to look like his parrot has bizarre new name. Mirror, March 25. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/man-who-chopped-ears-look-7627260.
- 23.Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997).Google Scholar
- 24.Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997).Google Scholar