Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 431–452 | Cite as

“Just do your job”: technology, bureaucracy, and the eclipse of conscience in contemporary medicine

  • Jacob A. BlytheEmail author
  • Farr A. Curlin


Market metaphors have come to dominate discourse on medical practice. In this essay, we revisit Peter Berger and colleagues’ analysis of modernization in their book The Homeless Mind and place that analysis in conversation with Max Weber’s 1917 lecture “Science as a Vocation” to argue that the rise of market metaphors betokens the carry-over to medical practice of various features from the institutions of technological production and bureaucratic administration. We refer to this carry-over as the product presumption. The product presumption foregrounds accidental features of medicine while hiding its essential features. It thereby confounds the public understanding of medicine and impedes the professional achievement of the excellences most central to medical practice. In demonstrating this pattern, we focus on a recent article, “Physicians, Not Conscripts—Conscientious Objection in Health Care,” in which Ronit Stahl and Ezekiel Emanuel decry conscientious refusals by medical practitioners. We demonstrate that Stahl and Emanuel’s argument depends on the product presumption, ignoring and undermining central features of good medicine. We conclude by encouraging conscientious resistance to the product presumption and the language it engenders.


Conscience Medical metaphors Philosophy of medicine Modernity Modernization Professionalism 


  1. 1.
    MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After virtue: A study in moral theory. 2nd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fein, Rashi. 1982. What is wrong with the language of medicine? New England Journal of Medicine 306: 863–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malone, Ruth E. 1999. Policy as product: Morality and metaphor in health policy discourse. Hastings Center Report 29: 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weber, Max. 1946. Science as a vocation. In From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, ed. H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 129–156. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Siegler, Mark, and Ann Dudley Goldblatt. 1981. Clinical intuition: A procedure for balancing the rights of patients and the responsibilities of physicians. In The law-medicine relation: A philosophical exploration, ed. Stuart F. Spicker, Joseph M. Healey Jr., and H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr., 5–31. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Annas, George J. 1995. Reframing the debate on health care reform by replacing our metaphors. New England Journal of Medicine 332: 744–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murdoch, Iris. 1970. The sovereignty of good. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hauerwas, Stanley. 1972. The significance of vision: Toward an aesthetic ethic. Studies in Religion 2: 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hauerwas, Stanley. 2015. How to write a theological sentence. In The work of theology, 122–145. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berger, Peter L., Brigitte Berger, and Hansfried Kellner. 1973. The homeless mind: Modernization and consciousness. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stahl, Ronit Y., and Ezekiel J. Emanuel. 2017. Physicians, not conscripts—conscientious objection in health care. New England Journal of Medicine 376: 1380–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hunter, Kathryn Montgomery. 1991. Doctors’ stories: The narrative structure of medical knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Curlin, Farr A., Lydia S. Dugdale, John D. Lantos, and Marshall H. Chin. 2007. Do religious physicians disproportionately care for the underserved? Annals of Family Medicine 5: 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yoon, John D., Jiwon H. Shin, Andy L. Nian, and Farr A. Curlin. 2015. Religion, sense of calling, and the practice of medicine: Findings from a national survey of primary care physicians and psychiatrists. Southern Medical Journal 108: 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton. 2007. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Booth, Wayne C. 1988. The company we keep: An ethics of fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Osiel, Mark J. 1998. Obeying orders: Atrocity, military discipline and the law of war. California Law Review 86: 939–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nussbaum, Martha C. 1992. Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rawls, John. 1999. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Reason and feeling in thinking about justice. Ethics 99: 229–249.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brock, Dan W. 2008. Conscientious refusal by physicians and pharmacists: Who is obligated to do what, and why? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29: 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. 2015. Policy statement #2–15: Professional obligations and human rights.
  24. 24.
    Savulescu, Julian. 2006. Conscientious objection in medicine. British Medical Journal 332: 294–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nair-Collins, Michael. 2015. Laying futility to rest. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40: 554–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Swartz, Martha S. 2006. Conscience clauses or unconscionable clauses: Personal beliefs versus professional responsibilities. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 6: 269–350.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Veatch, Robert M., and Carol Mason Spicer. 1992. Medically futile care: The role of the physician in setting limits. American Journal of Law and Medicine 18: 15–36.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sulmasy, Daniel P. 2008. What is conscience and why is respect for it so important? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29: 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MedicineStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations